WHO REALLY RULES THE WORLD? PART 1 — DOMINATION, RECIPROCITY, AND PARTNERSHIP
The Ancient System of Control We Still Live Under
By Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA)
From ANUNNAKI, EVOLUTION OF THE GODS, by Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) and Janet Kira Lessin (CEO, World Peace Association)
Balance GIVING & GETTING—the poles of RECIPROCITIES, Part 4 of Amend the Malevolent Matrix Our Anunnaki Makers Mentored.
The Anunnaki bosses inculcated domination, caste, class, and authoritarian ideology in us Earthlings, but Anunnaki Princess Ninmah, the Great Goddess of ordinary people, offers a cooperative, synergistic partnership consciousness to replace it.
Every human relationship involves an exchange of something—energy, labor, affection, information, resources, protection, influence, or ideas. Those exchanges all fall somewhere along a single relationship dimension.
COMPETITION-COOPERATION POLES COMPRISE RECIPROCITY
Giving and taking form the two poles of one social dimension. Every relationship occupies some position along that continuum. Competition and cooperation are not the poles themselves. They are social strategies that people employ while interacting along this giving–taking continuum.
COMPETITION
Competition can encourage excellence, creativity, innovation, and achievement without exploiting anyone. Athletes compete while respecting agreed-upon rules. Scientists compete to solve problems while building upon one another’s discoveries. Businesses compete for customers while honoring contracts and voluntary exchange.
Domination begins when competition abandons reciprocity and becomes coercive—when stronger individuals or institutions take more than they give and deny others equal standing.
COOPERATION
Cooperation does not require eliminating all competition. Families, neighborhoods, research teams, and democratic societies cooperate toward common goals while still encouraging individuals to develop their unique abilities.
Partnership develops when giving and receiving remain balanced through voluntary, fair, and mutually beneficial exchange.
Human societies do not choose between two unrelated systems called competition and cooperation. Rather, every society continually moves along a single continuum stretching from domination through reciprocity toward partnership. Every family, school, religion, business, government, and civilization tells its members where to stand on that continuum. That position becomes the society’s operating system. Humanity continually asks not whether competition should exist, but whether it remains embedded in reciprocity, fairness, and mutual respect—or degenerates into domination, exploitation, and coercion.
The Anunnaki Archetype of Dominance, Dementia, and Partnership Power runs through our entire planetary history.
Who Really Rules the World, Sasha Alex Lessin PhD, Janet Kira Lessin, Anunnaki, Ninmah, Enki, Enlil, Nibiru, Malevolent Matrix, Domination Consciousness, Partnership Consciousness, Reciprocity, Giving and Getting, Competition, Cooperation, Human Relationships, Human Freedom, Ancient Systems of Control, Social Hierarchy, Fair Exchange, Mutual Aid, Anthropology, Alternative History, Enki Speaks, Dragon at the End of Time
Related reading: https://wp.me/p1TVCy-9jB
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNbUjFi65K8&t=1s
NEXT: PART 2 — RULERS WHO KILL TO RULE: ALEXANDER, MARDUK, AND IMPERIAL POWER
WHO REALLY RULES THE WORLD? PART II — RULERS WHO KILL TO RULE: ALEXANDER, MARDUK, AND IMPERIAL POWER
The Ancient System of Control We Still Live Under
By Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA)
From ANUNNAKI, EVOLUTION OF THE GODS, by Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) and Janet Kira Lessin (CEO, World Peace Association)
RULERS WHO KILL TO RULE
Historical example
ALEXANDER (affirmed as son of Anunnaki Prince Marduk/Zeus in Babylon & Egypt) & HIS GREEK ARMY TOOK THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN, EGYPT & SCYTHIA
Click https://wp.me/p1TVCy-2MP for more on Alexander.
When Tyre fell to the Greeks in 331 BCE, Alexander massacred 8,000 Tyrians, sold 30,000 of them into slavery & controlled the entire eastern Mediterranean. Alexander quickly reached Babylon and rushed to its ziggurat temple. At the temple, he grasped the hands of Marduk/Zeus/Ra [same Anunnaki Dude, as he was called in Sumer, Greece & Egypt, respectively] as conquerors before he had.
But ALEXANDER SAW MARDUK’S CORPSE preserved in oils in his Babylon ziggurat.
EGYPT welcomed the Greeks without a fight. Alexander founded the Egyptian city of Alexandria, then left his troops & rode a week across the desert to the Siwa Oasis.
There, he communed in what he thought was a private audience with the gold statue of Marduk. Alexander asked Marduk’s statue, “Am I Zeus’ son?”
THE TEMPLE’S PRIEST, FROM A HIDDEN CHAMBER BEHIND THE STATUE, CONFIRMED ALEXANDER AS THE SON OF RA-AMEN, AKA MARDUK.
ALEXANDER’S ARMY CONQUERED THE PERSIAN ARMY AT GAUGAMELA (Iraq), TOOK SUSA (Persia’s Capital) & KILLED PERSIAN KING DARIUS
In 331 BCE, Alexander tricked the Persian Army into a trap at Gaugamela (Iraq). He left a gap in his infantry. Persian Chariots rushed the gap & charged the Greek infantry, exposing the Persian center to Alexander’s cavalry. Greek cavalry & infantry killed 300,000 Persians. The Greeks lost only 100 men. Anunnaki Prince Marduk controlled both Greeks & Persians, pitting them against each other without them realizing he was obscuring his own power behind the conflicts he instigated.
Both the Greeks, who followed Marduk as Zeus, and the Persians, who followed Marduk as Ahura Mazda, worshipped Marduk. Alexander proclaimed himself the King of Asia & marched to the Persian capital, Susa, which surrendered without a fight. Alexander took Persepolis, Bactria, Sogdiana, and Cyropolis.
From Persepolis, Alexander sent the gold home to Macedonia. He let his troops rob, murder the men & rape the women.
Alexander and his drunk generals led the Greeks as they burned Darius’s palace.
Alexander chased Darius to make him abdicate as Persia’s God and King.
Though Darius’ generals speared Darius and left him for dead, Alexander found him dying. Alexander said he’d honor and exalt Darius’ kin. In return, Darius abdicated as god and king, gave Alexander the jobs, and then died.
WHO REALLY RULES THE WORLD? PART III — AMERICA’S POWER STRUGGLE: JOHN ADAMS, JEFFERSON, AND FREE SPEECH
The Ancient System of Control We Still Live Under
By Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA)
From ANUNNAKI, EVOLUTION OF THE GODS, by Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) and Janet Kira Lessin (CEO, World Peace Association)
Early American example
U.S. PRES. JOHN ADAMS, the Proto-Trump in thrall to Anunnaki Domination Consciousness, SUPPRESSED FREE SPEECH, JAILED CRITICS. Adams’ rivals, Jefferson and Madison, believed liberty depended upon citizens retaining the right to criticize those in power. The battle between free speech and censorship still shapes American history today.
THE REVOLUTION ENDED, THE U.S.’S POWER STRUGGLE BEGAN
The American Revolution expelled British rule, but it did not eliminate domination-consciousness. Many of George Washington’s officers, along with wealthy merchants, bankers, and lawyers who rose to power after independence, remained comfortable with hierarchical institutions. They admired British stability and believed educated elites should guide society. Jefferson, Madison, farmers, artisans, frontier settlers, immigrants, and many Revolutionary War veterans feared that America’s new rulers might recreate the same concentrations of power they had supposedly fought to escape. The conflict reflected two visions of society. Adams trusted authority; Jefferson, like AOC and Sanders, trusted citizens.
THE REVOLUTION ENDED ENGLISH DOMINATION, BUT FEDERALISTS SOUGHT CONTROL OF AMERICA
The American Revolution expelled British rule, but it did not eliminate a sense of domination. Many of George Washington’s military officers, along with wealthy merchants, bankers, and lawyers who rose to power after independence, remained comfortable with hierarchical institutions. They admired British stability and believed educated elites should guide society. Federalists favored a strong national government, centralized authority, and policies that benefited commercial interests.
Opposing the Federalists, Jefferson, Madison, farmers, artisans, frontier settlers, immigrants, and many Revolutionary War veterans feared that America’s new rulers might recreate the same concentrations of power they had supposedly fought to escape.
FEAR OF FRANCE, FEAR OF THE PEOPLE ABETTED ADAMS’ AUTHORITARIANISM
During the 1790s, France and Britain fought across Europe and the seas. American leaders tried to remain neutral, but tensions mounted, and French privateers seized American ships. Federalists warned that French revolutionary ideas might spread inside the United States.
Federalists viewed French and Irish immigrants with suspicion because these groups often supported Jefferson’s Democratic Republicans. Elite Federalist leaders demanded greater authority to quell the French and scapegoated immigrants to add urgency to their demand for legal control of America. Domination advocates like the Federalists (and nowadays like Trump’s MAGAs) justify expanded authority by outsiders as subversives to scapegoat.
The dominators exaggerated wealthy Americans’ fears of both the external French threat and the internal, imagined threat from immigrants and poor people. Federalists equated criticism with disloyalty to America’s stand against the French.
Jefferson and his followers, who embraced partnership consciousness, argued that criticism was needed to prevent the government from becoming tyrannical.
ADAMS JAILED HIS CRITICS
The Federalists passed the Sedition Act, which moved America toward monarchical presidential control. Adams quickly prosecuted 25 citizens; most were newspaper editors. Benjamin Franklin BACHE, grandson of Benjamin Franklin and editor of the Aurora Newspaper, faced charges for criticizing Adams. Congressman Matthew LYON of Vermont criticized the President; Adams had him convicted, fined $1,000, and imprisoned. But Vermonters reelected Lyon while he remained behind bars.
Citizens increasingly saw the Adams administration, rather than immigrants and the American poor, as evidence that the U.S. government itself had become the problem. Under the Sedition Act, the government prosecuted 25 editors, journalists, and political opponents, but its attempts to silence dissent only generated more dissent.
JEFFERSON AND MADISON FOUGHT BACK
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison secretly organized resistance. They wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, challenging the constitutionality of the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Resolutions argued that the federal government possessed only limited powers. Jefferson argued that states could resist unconstitutional federal actions. Jefferson and Madison framed the issue as a defense of constitutional liberty. Their resistance reflected a partnership model of governance in which authority should serve rather than harass citizens. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions helped unify opposition forces nationwide.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REJECTED FEDERALIST RULE
The 1800 election became a referendum on the Alien and Sedition Acts. Federalists warned that Jeffersonian victory would produce chaos. Jeffersonians warned that a Federalist victory would destroy liberty. Voters sided with Jefferson. His election as Adams’ successor marked the first peaceful transfer of power between rival political parties in American history.
Jefferson immediately pardoned those convicted under the Sedition Act. The Federalist Party never fully recovered. Citizens had delivered a powerful verdict: Government exists to protect liberty, not suppress it.
The peaceful transition demonstrated that political disagreement need not lead to violence. Jefferson’s election victory became one of the most important victories for democratic self-government in American history; it would be like Sanders and AOC beating Trump and Vance in 2028.
The Alien and Sedition Acts eventually expired or were repealed. Yet the underlying conflict remains. Again and again, successive American governments have invoked spurious national security concerns like the Patriot Act to justify restrictions upon liberty. World War I produced new Sedition Acts. The Red Scare generated loyalty investigations and political blacklists, and modern administrations of both parties have expanded surveillance and executive authority during crises. Each generation confronts the same question. How much freedom should citizens surrender when leaders promise greater security?
Viewed through the framework of Dominator Consciousness, the answer favors centralized authority, secrecy, hierarchy, and control. But viewed through the framework of Partnership Consciousness, the answer emphasizes transparency, participation, accountability, and liberty. John Adams was not Donald Trump. The historical circumstances differ greatly. Yet both administrations reveal a recurring temptation within political systems: leaders facing criticism seek mechanisms to suppress critics. The lesson of 1798 remains clear: FREE SPEECH MATTERS MOST WHEN IT PROTECTS UNPOPULAR OPINIONS. Liberty matters most when those in power dislike what citizens are saying. The Alien and Sedition Acts stand as a cautionary tale. The founders themselves discovered that the greatest threat to freedom often comes not from foreign enemies, but from the fear that causes leaders to abandon the principles they claim to defend.
