by Janet Lessinupdated on August 10, 2026August 10, 2026

THE OFFICE OF THE UNIFIER: Merlin, Enki, and the Man Who Said Secrecy Was Over

Manuel Lamiroy spent most of his summary of galactic history mapping migrations, empires, and hostilities that ran for millions of years. Then he set one name into the middle of his conflict-resolution section, and that name reframes everything around it.

He called the figure who ended the Orion wars Merlin.

The fighting had long passed the point where either alliance could win. Lamiroy traces how the trouble began over territory and hardened into something worse, a contest of mindsets, with one side committed to service toward others and the other committed to service toward self. Each faction saw the opposing camp as the source of all harm. Each saw itself as the injured party. A third group of rebels then broke from the Federation out of exhaustion with the whole arrangement, and the deadlock gained a third corner while moving an inch closer to resolution.

Then a boy grew up among those rebels. Lamiroy describes remarkable talents in him from childhood, and on reaching manhood he began to teach. His subject ran to universal spiritual law, unconditional love, and forgiveness. His argument cut at the foundation rather than the surface. Every party to the conflict, the rebels included, still perceived reality through duality, and that perception formed the illusion holding the whole structure in place. He changed the minds of the rebels first. The Federation and the Empires followed. Peace agreements arrived after the change of mind rather than before it, and awareness rose across entire populations, with masses of people ascending into a higher-dimensional reality. A priesthood carrying his teaching survives to this day.

They called him the Unifier.

WHAT THE OFFICE REQUIRES

Read the account as a job description rather than a biography and four requirements stand out.

The Unifier rises from inside one of the factions. He speaks as kin, and the people he addresses hear a brother rather than a stranger. An outsider delivering the same words would have moved nobody.

He refuses his own side’s version of righteousness. The rebels held the most sympathetic position available, and he told them their perception failed along with everyone else’s. That refusal costs him the one audience most inclined to protect him.

He names duality itself as the adversary. Both camps had spent millions of years identifying an enemy across the field. He turns the whole apparatus around and locates the enemy in the way each side sees.

He teaches rather than commands. The peace holds because minds changed first, and treaties then followed the change. Force applied in the reverse order had failed for millions of years.

Meet those four conditions and you occupy the office. The name attached to the person matters far less than the shape of what the person does.

ENKI PERFORMS THE SAME FUNCTION

Enki’s entire record on Earth follows this shape.

Authority ordered silence and he spoke. Enlil moved to keep the Earthlings ignorant and short-lived, and Enki handed over knowledge. The Deluge came with an order to warn nobody, and Enki spoke through a reed wall so the letter of his oath held while the man behind it survived. Each act carries one signature: disclosure against a standing order, delivered from within the family that issued the order.

Enki qualified for the office because he belonged to the faction he broke with. His brother ruled. His father presided. He spent his life inside the machinery he exposed, which is the whole reason his exposure landed.

That method answers a question worth stating plainly. Extinction arrives through silence more often than through weapons. A population that knows what approaches can choose. A population kept ignorant has choice removed before the crisis reaches it. Enki’s response to the threat of extinction consisted of telling, and he told at moments when telling carried the highest possible cost.

THE JESUS STRAND

Glenn Bogue built the case that Jesus continues Enki and that Yahweh continues Enlil. His thesis carries weight across the theology dossier, and the office frame strengthens it rather than replacing it.

Consider the requirements again. A teacher rises from inside the tradition he corrects. He tells his own people that their righteousness has failed, which costs him their protection. His subject runs to forgiveness, to love extended toward the enemy, to a kingdom found within rather than won across a battlefield. He attacks the dividing line itself. A priesthood carrying his teaching survives to this day, in the same phrase Lamiroy applied to Merlin two thousand years and several star systems away.

The office fits whether or not one being wore both names. That freedom matters, and the next section explains why.

THE MAN WHO SAID SECRECY WAS OVER

A.R. Bordon served as Managing Scientist of the Life Physics Group California through nineteen years of Link conferences with representatives of other worlds. In January 2011 he stood before the Link Plenum with a petition for observer membership on behalf of the Linkage Institute International, describing his initiative as one grain of sand among six billion human lives and predicting that the membership would grow as word spread that an ordinary person’s voice could count in the conversation.

The name A.R. Bordon belonged to several writers rather than one man. The Link says so on its acknowledgments page. Members published under pen names authorized by the membership itself, a policy adopted so that writers bound by nondisclosure agreements and various oaths could put research into the world at all.

The group disbanded in October 2012. Wes Penre, who belonged to the Linkage Institute and argued with Bordon over the question of DNA strands, reports that Bordon died some months afterward, and that shortly before the end he stated the time of secrecy had finished and that the work should proceed in the open.

Read that final act against the four requirements. A man positioned inside a body of people bound by oaths of silence, holding the authority that silence conferred, released the material and told his people to work in daylight. Whatever else the record shows about him, that closing move belongs to the office.

OFFICE RATHER THAN IDENTITY

Two readings of this pattern exist, and the difference between them decides how far the argument travels.

The first says one continuous being wore these names across millions of years, appearing as Merlin among the Orion rebels, as Enki on Earth, as Jesus in Judea, and as an itinerant scientist in the American century. The framework we have built already holds beings of that kind, and Thoth’s non-local nature makes room for the possibility.

The second says the office recurs and gets filled by whoever meets its conditions. Polarization reaches a state where force has exhausted itself, and someone inside one of the camps refuses his own side’s righteousness and names the division as the illusion.

The second reading carries further, for a reason worth stating in the open. A chain of identity that absorbs every wise and long-lived figure explains every piece of evidence with equal ease, which leaves nothing capable of testing it. Critics reach for that objection first because it works. A recurring office makes a claim that could fail. Show a polarized conflict resolved by force alone, with mindsets unchanged, and the pattern breaks. That vulnerability gives the argument its strength.

Lamiroy left this door open himself. He wrote of Merlin, or of the Merlin archetype, and he closed with the priesthood rather than with the man. Both phrases describe a function that returns rather than a person who persists.

THE OTHER HALF OF THE WORK

The Orion account preserves one half of the office and loses the other.

Disclosure alone leaves people shattered by what they learn. A population told the truth about its origins, its makers, and the machinery that has run it for six thousand years needs more than information. It needs healing, and it needs someone standing between it and the consequences of what it now knows.

Ninmah carries that half. She shaped the bodies and she tended what she shaped. Mary carries it forward in the same posture, receiving petitions and standing between the supplicant and the judgment. The Unifier who teaches and the mother who heals form one office worked by two hands, and any account that keeps the teaching while dropping the intercession describes half a rescue.

Choosing completes the pattern. Enki tells. Ninmah heals. The people then decide, and the decision belongs to them, which was always the point of telling them in the first place.

THE OFFICE STANDS OPEN

Lamiroy reports peace across the galactic neighborhood, with a truce holding wherever peace fails. He names Earth among the places where the majority still live inside the veil of duality, still sorting the world into the righteous camp and the other one.

Which means the office remains open here.

History says how it fills. Someone rises from inside one of the factions, refuses that faction’s certainty, names the division itself as the thing to dissolve, and pays the price that refusal always carries. The office has filled that way in Orion, in Sumer, in Judea, and in a small scientific cooperative that dissolved itself and told its members to work in the light.

It will fill that way again.

THE VOICES

Every account in this article reaches you through a person. Each of them deserves a name, a history, and an honest description of how they came by what they claim.

Manuel Lamiroy, Lic. Juris. Born in Belgium, resident in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal. He trained in law and worked as an academic researcher with a teaching assignment until 1994, when he left that career and started a consulting company that freed his time for extraterrestrial research. A course in regression therapy opened the door to his investigative work, and he began taking abduction and contact cases while sharing findings with other researchers and regression therapists. He centralized that material in a database called the Hyperbase, halted work on it in 2008, and built the Exopaedia as its successor. He founded Exopolitics South Africa in 2006 and still runs it. He has served as Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Abduction-Encounter Research since its relaunch in October 2015, and he counts among the founding members of GLEXO, the Global Exopolitics Organization. He teaches an online course on research methodology for this field. He remains active as of December 2025.

A.R. Bordon. A pen name covering several writers. The Link states the arrangement in its own acknowledgments: members of the Life Physics Group California published under names authorized by the membership, a policy adopted so that writers bound by nondisclosure agreements and various oaths could put their research into the world. Bordon served as Managing Scientist of the cooperative alongside Robert B. Solingen as Director of Research and James T. Traveler on exopolitical constituencies. The group dissolved in October 2012. Bordon died some months afterward, and shortly before the end he declared the era of secrecy finished.

Wes Penre. A member of the Linkage Institute who published Bordon’s Link Plenum protocol after Bordon’s death, with Bordon’s stated permission. He describes himself as a metaphysician and a layman rather than a scientist, and he records his disagreements with Bordon in the open, including a dispute over DNA strands. His Nibiru material carries the Sirius origin account this series draws on.

Glenn Bogue. Attorney and researcher, recurring guest on Aquarian Media. His work identifying Jesus with Enki and Yahweh with Enlil comes out of textual and legal analysis rather than contact experience, and it anchors the theology strand across our Nibiru material.

Zecharia Sitchin. Translator of the Sumerian and Akkadian record, whose reading of the tablets supplies the chronology and the personnel this entire field works from. Janet Kira Lessin studied under him from 1998 through 2010.

HOW THEY KNOW

The methods behind these accounts differ from one another, and the differences matter more than any single claim.

Lamiroy works by synthesis. His information comes from channeled material, from contactee reports, from regression sessions in which people returned to lives on other worlds, and from what he calls active recall, meaning people who began remembering such lives without prompting. He compares these testimonies, notes where they contradict one another, and builds the most consistent narrative he can from the overlap. Where his sources disagree on dates he says so and explains which one he follows and why.

He also states his own limits at the front of his work. Channels interpret what reaches them, and interpretation introduces distortion. The extraterrestrial sources themselves may carry bias. The researcher assembling the material may lean toward preferred conclusions, and he observes that people who have suffered victimization tend to read conflicts through victims and victimizers. A lawyer built those cautions into his own foundation. We hold his account to the standard he set for it.

Bordon claimed direct and ongoing contact. His group reported nineteen years of annual conferences with representatives of other worlds and petitioned for observer membership at that table in January 2011. Their method for travel and observation carried the name Extension Neurosensing, in which the traveler lies down and sends an avatar out to move through space and time with full perception. That description matches the technique Janet Kira Lessin has practiced across four decades, arrived at with no knowledge of his work.

Penre works as a systematizer rather than a source, gathering and organizing the accounts of others within a metaphysical frame he states openly.

Bogue works from documents. Scripture, law, and the comparison of texts.

Sitchin worked from clay. Tablets, seals, and the languages that carry them.

Janet Kira Lessin brings firsthand testimony. Six decades of contact experience, astral travel including visits to the Nibiru ruins, and a daily practice of receiving material in the hypnagogic state that has run for forty years.

Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D., brings the discipline. Anthropology from UCLA, comparative method, and half a century of holding these accounts against the archaeological and textual record.

HOW WE CORRELATE

We hold every claim in this series against evidence from outside the field that produced it.

Anthropology and archaeology supply the physical record: the sites, the strata, the tools, the bones, and the sudden appearances that conventional accounts leave unexplained. Astronomy supplies numbers that settle arguments, and where a claim fails against them we say so in print rather than waiting for a critic to say it for us. The orbital arithmetic surrounding Nibiru and Nemesis presents a problem of exactly this kind, and a companion article in this series works through it. History supplies pattern, and the dynastic material running from the Sirian Unity Kingdom through the Tudor settlement to the present concentration of wealth follows one shape across three scales. Comparative mythology supplies corroboration wherever cultures with no contact between them describe the same event.

Correlation of this kind rules claims out as often as it supports them. That result serves the reader, and we publish both outcomes.

DOES THIS RESONATE?

Now the part that matters most, and the reason we assemble the apparatus above rather than asking you to take our word.

Read what we have laid out and check it against yourself. Which portions land as true in your own experience? Which portions fail to? What have you seen, dreamed, remembered, or known that these accounts illuminate, and what have you seen that contradicts them outright? Where a passage serves you, tell us how. Where it falls short, tell us that as well, because the corrections readers send us have changed this material before and will change it again.

We ask you to test rather than to believe, and the distinction carries the whole weight of this work.

Belief hands your power to whoever holds the paradigm. Every major religion, every political creed, and every economic orthodoxy runs on the same engine: convince enough people to accept a frame without examining it, and the frame begins generating wealth and obedience for whoever administers it. The Anunnaki taught our ancestors that engine, the priesthoods refined it, and the men who own the world today run the identical play with newer machinery. Same Play, New Actors traces that lineage in detail.

So we present rather than preach. Each of these accounts sparks a small universe in the mind that receives it, and that universe belongs to you. Build with what serves. Discard what fails. Bring us what you find.

REFERENCES

Bogue, G. Talks and interviews on the Enki and Enlil identifications, Aquarian Media archive.

Bordon, A.R. The Link: Extraterrestrials in Near Earth Space and Contact on the Ground. Life Physics Group California, 2007.

Bordon, A.R. Statement before the Link Plenum, 10 January 2011. Published for Linkage Institute members, January 2011.

Lamiroy, M. “A Summary of Galactic History,” Parts 1 and 2. Exopolitics South Africa, first published 16 November 2009, republished 11 June 2013, image links restored January 2015. exopoliticssouthafrica.org/news/in-depth/5-a-summary-of-galactic-history

Lamiroy, M. Exopaedia. exopaedia.org

Lessin, S.A., and Lessin, J.K. Anunnaki, Evolution of the Gods. Aquarian Media.

Penre, W. “Nephilim, The Fallen Angels.” The Wes Penre Papers, 4-7, 2011.

Penre, W. “Fourth Level of Learning,” Appendix Paper A: Protocol of a Meeting Between Human and Extraterrestrial Galactic Representatives on Planet Earth in 2011. wespenre.com

Sitchin, Z. The Earth Chronicles, complete series. Bear and Company.

Sitchin, Z. The Lost Book of Enki. Bear and Company, 2002.