NO OTHER GODS: Break the Godspell
Part 2: THE ELEPHANT IN EVERY ROOM
A series by Janet Kira Lessin and Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D.
Contributor: Claudia Lenore
There is an ancient parable about blind men and an elephant.
Each man touches a different part of the animal. One grabs the trunk and declares it a snake. Another feels the leg and calls it a tree. A third runs his hand along the flank and says it is a wall. They argue. They fight. Each is absolutely certain that the others are lying or deluded, because the piece they touched was real. They felt it with their own hands.
None of them is wrong. And none of them sees the elephant.
That parable is the single most accurate description of the political, spiritual, and geopolitical reality unfolding across the planet right now, in the first weeks of February 2026, as 3.5 million pages of the Jeffrey Epstein files spill across the internet like blood from an open wound that the body politic has been trying to bandage shut for decades.
Everyone has a piece of the elephant. Nobody — not the MAGA faithful, not the progressive resistance, not the evangelical church, not the Israeli government, not the Palestinian mother burying her child, not the Russian propagandist, not the European diplomat — nobody has the whole animal.
This article is going to walk around it. All of it. Every faction, every faith, every political tribe, every geopolitical player. We are going to touch every part of this creature, and then we are going to step back far enough to see its shape.
And then — because this is NO OTHER GODS and not CNN — we are going to ask the question nobody on television will ask: What if the elephant isn’t an elephant at all? What if it’s something older, something with a name, something that has been steering human civilization since before the first temple was built in Sumer?
Buckle up.
The View from MAGA Country
Start where the energy is loudest.
If you are a Trump supporter, the Epstein files are the vindication you were promised. The entire MAGA narrative — that a corrupt global elite runs a shadow government, that powerful people traffic children, that the media lies, that the Deep State protects its own — all of it seems to land with a thud in 3.5 million pages of federal evidence.
And you are not entirely wrong.
Leslie Wexner, the billionaire who built Victoria’s Secret into a global empire, was labeled a “co-conspirator” by the FBI in a 2019 document that remained redacted until yesterday — February 10, 2026 — when Congressman Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, forced the Department of Justice to uncover his name. Bill Clinton’s name is threaded through the files like a recurring nightmare. Prince Andrew’s photographs speak for themselves. The names that have surfaced include financiers, diplomats, tech moguls, and a sultan who apparently received an email from Epstein about a “torture video.”
For MAGA, this is the storm they were told was coming.
But here is where the elephant’s trunk becomes a wall, and the wall becomes a floor, and the floor opens into a pit: Donald Trump’s name appears more than three thousand times in the Epstein files. The FBI compiled a list of sexual assault allegations against the sitting president. Trump visited Moscow multiple times, cultivated relationships with Russian oligarchs, learned his political tradecraft at the knee of Roy Cohn — a man whose career began with the execution of Ethel Rosenberg and ended with mob lawyers and closeted hypocrisy — and has operated for his entire adult life on one simple principle that Cohn taught him before Cohn died of AIDS in 1986: Always have dirt on everybody. Never apologize. Claim victory no matter what.
If you are MAGA, your anti-virus just fired. You are scanning this paragraph for evidence that the writer is a leftist, a Democrat, an enemy. You are preparing to stop reading.
Don’t.
Because what comes next is worse for the other side.
The View from the Left
If you are a Democrat, a progressive, a member of the resistance, the Epstein files are also your vindication — but a different flavor of it. You see Trump’s name three thousand times and feel a rush of confirmation. You see the Roy Cohn connection, and you nod. You see the Russia thread and think, “We told you so.” Active Measures. The Manchurian Candidate. We knew it all along.
And you are also not entirely wrong.
In 2018, a documentary called Active Measures, directed by Jack Bryan, laid out the case that Trump’s relationship with Russia was not a recent development but a decades-long cultivation. Trump’s first visit to Moscow was in 1987. He returned for the Miss Universe pageant in 2013, where he partied with oligarchs connected to Putin’s inner circle, met with the Agalarov family — Aras Agalarov, nicknamed “Putin’s Builder” — and left Moscow after just two and a half days to attend Billy Graham’s 95th birthday, because his presidential ambitions were already running. The documentary traces the money. It follows the bankruptcies that made Trump untouchable to American banks and drove him into the arms of Russian capital. It names Felix Sater, a convicted felon with ties to Russian intelligence, who operated out of Trump Tower through the Bayrock Group.
The left sees all of this and says: Russian asset.
But here is where your piece of the elephant bites you: Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane twenty-six times. Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman had connections that thread through the same networks. The Democratic establishment protected its own for decades, just as the Republican establishment protected its own. The names in Epstein’s files do not respect party lines. They respect power lines. And power does not wear a jersey.
Representative Ro Khanna — a Democrat from California — stood on the House floor yesterday and read aloud the names of six men the Department of Justice had been hiding. He did not do this to protect his party. He did it because the cover-up is bipartisan, the complicity is bipartisan, and the victims do not care whether their rapist voted red or blue.
“If we found six men who were hiding in two hours,” Khanna said, “imagine how many men they are covering up for in those three million files.”
The View from the Church
If you are an evangelical Christian, you may have made peace with Trump as an imperfect vessel — a flawed man chosen by God to accomplish divine purposes. You are not the first to make this argument. The Bible is full of imperfect vessels. David was an adulterer and a murderer. Solomon had seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines. Cyrus the Great, who freed the Jews from Babylon, was a pagan.
The evangelical case for Trump rests on outcomes: judges, abortion policy, religious liberty, and Israel. The character of the man is secondary to the work of the Lord through the man.
But the Epstein files are not a question of character. They are a question of complicity. And the church has its own history with complicity that it has never fully reckoned with — from the Inquisition to the residential schools, from the cover-up of sexual abuse within the Catholic priesthood to the silence of Protestant denominations when their own pastors were credibly accused.
The documentary The Family, which examined the National Prayer Breakfast and the secretive fellowship of powerful men who have shaped American politics through a private theology of power, revealed something that should trouble every person of faith: the idea that God chooses leaders not because they are good but because they are powerful, and that power itself is evidence of divine selection.
That theology has a much older name. In Sumer, five thousand years before Christ, it was called the divine right of kingship. And it was not a metaphor. It was a system of governance installed by beings who called themselves gods and who, on tablets that still exist in museums around the world, demanded: No other gods before me.
And then, on February 5, 2026 — six days ago, as I write this — the theology became spectacle.
President Trump stood at the 74th annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington and spoke for over seventy-seven minutes. At a prayer breakfast. He called Congressman Thomas Massie — the same Massie who four days later would force the Justice Department to unredact the names of Epstein’s co-conspirators — a “moron.” He declared that no person of faith could vote for a Democrat. He cursed. He rambled about sleeping on planes, about Melania’s movie, about his own ego. He mocked House Speaker Mike Johnson for asking to pray before lunch. “He’ll say to me sometimes at lunch, ‘Sir, may we pray?’ Say, excuse me, we’re having lunch.” The audience laughed. At a prayer breakfast.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth took the podium and declared, “America was founded as a Christian nation. It remains a Christian nation in our DNA.” He announced monthly prayer services at the Pentagon — the nerve center of the world’s most powerful military — and quoted scripture as justification for war. “The warrior who is willing to lay down his life for his unit, his country, and his Creator, that warrior finds eternal life.”
Trump then announced a May 17 event on the National Mall to “rededicate America as one nation under God.”
This is what institutional capture looks like when the institution is religion itself.
The National Prayer Breakfast was, for decades, organized by a secretive Christian fellowship known as “The Family” — the same organization exposed in the 2019 Netflix documentary The Family, which revealed how a network of powerful men used a private theology of power to shape American and international politics. The theology was simple: God does not choose leaders because they are good. God chooses leaders because they are powerful. Power is the proof of divine selection.
I am Marduk. I am Trump. There shall be no other gods before me.
The form remains. The substance has been replaced. Thoth warned us. We laughed, or we prayed, or we scrolled past the headline. And the councils were already taken.
The View from Israel and Palestine
The elephant has a Middle Eastern flank covered in blood.
If you are an Israeli — particularly a supporter of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government — the Epstein files are a distant American scandal with little bearing on the existential questions of survival that dominate your daily life. But Netanyahu’s own legal troubles, his alliances with figures connected to the same international networks of wealth and influence that Epstein inhabited, and the broader question of who holds leverage over whom in the intelligence world — these are not abstract questions for a nation whose survival has always depended on knowing secrets before its enemies do.
If you are a Palestinian, the elephant is not Epstein. The elephant is the rubble of your neighborhood. The elephant is the international order that lectures about human rights while funding the weapons that land on your children. And the Epstein files, from your vantage point, are proof of what you have always known: the powerful protect each other. Across borders. Across faiths. Across every line they draw on maps and tell you is sacred.
If you are a Jew in the diaspora — in New York, in London, in Buenos Aires — you carry a different piece. You watch the rise of antisemitism with one eye and the actions of the Israeli government with the other, and you know that the conflation of Judaism with the policies of any particular government is itself a weapon that has been used against your people for centuries. The Epstein files will be weaponized by antisemites. They already have been. And the failure to distinguish between the crimes of powerful individuals and the identity of an entire people is one of the oldest tricks in the authoritarian playbook.
The View from Moscow
If you are watching from Russia, the Epstein files are a gift wrapped in red, white, and blue.
The Kremlin’s spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, has already made the statement: “Now we know how the Western elite treat children, including their own.” Russia is using the files exactly the way a disinformation campaign is designed to work — not by lying, but by selecting which truths to amplify.
This is the core principle of active measures: you do not need to fabricate a scandal. You find a real one and make sure the right people see it at the right time, framed the right way. The Soviet Union perfected this technique during the Cold War. The KGB called it aktivnyye meropriyatiya — active measures — and it included forgery, front organizations, agents of influence, and the strategic deployment of genuine intelligence to destabilize adversaries.
The 2018 documentary Active Measures argued that Trump himself was the product of this kind of long-game cultivation. Whether or not that specific thesis is provable beyond reasonable doubt, the documented facts are striking: Trump’s multiple visits to Moscow, his financial dependence on Russian capital after American banks cut him off, his real estate deals with individuals connected to Russian organized crime, his public admiration for Putin, his push to dissolve NATO — every one of these data points sits comfortably inside the active measures playbook.
And Epstein? The files now reveal that Epstein was in contact with Russian-connected individuals. That he attempted to insert himself into Libyan state asset seizures in partnership with British and Israeli intelligence. That his entire operation — the videotaping, the photographing, the meticulous recording of every visitor to every property — was not a hobby. It was a kompromat factory. A machine for manufacturing leverage.
Roy Cohn taught Trump: always have dirt on people.
Epstein industrialized the principle.
The question is: for whom?
The View from Beijing
Xi Jinping does not tweet about the Epstein files. China does not produce breathless cable news coverage or name names on the floor of a legislature. China watches. China takes notes. China waits.
If the world is converging on the tripartite structure that George Orwell described in Nineteen Eighty-Four — and the argument grows harder to dismiss with every passing year — then Xi controls Eastasia, Putin commands Eurasia, and Trump presides over Oceania.
Orwell’s three superpowers were not truly at war. Their perpetual conflict was a choreographed theater — a system designed to keep populations afraid, divided, and obedient. The fighting never reached the heartland of any superpower. It churned endlessly through disputed territories — Africa, the Middle East, Southeast Asia — grinding civilian populations into fuel for an engine that existed solely to maintain the power of the ruling class in all three blocs.
“The war is not meant to be won,” Orwell wrote. “It is meant to be continuous.”
Look at the planet in February 2026. Look at Ukraine. Look at Gaza. Look at the South China Sea. Look at the rhetoric that shifts overnight — Eurasia was always our ally; Eastasia was always the enemy — and ask yourself whether the blind men are touching an elephant, or whether they are touching the bars of a cage that was built before any of them were born.
The View from the Victims
There is one perspective that cuts through every faction, every faith, every geopolitical chess game, and it belongs to the people who were hurt.
The victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s operation — young women, many of them minors, many of them vulnerable, many of them still alive and still carrying what was done to them in their nervous systems and their nightmares — do not care about your political tribe. They do not care about active measures or Orwell or the midterm elections. They care that men raped them, filmed it, and walked free. They care that the system designed to protect them instead protects the men who harmed them.
When the Department of Justice released 3.5 million pages on January 30, 2026, it failed to redact the names of some victims while simultaneously hiding the names of their abusers. Read that again. The system exposed the people who were harmed and shielded the people who harmed them.
“It’s a little bit of a farce,” Khanna said.
It is more than a farce. It is the architecture of impunity made visible. It is the structure that NO OTHER GODS exists to name: a system in which the powerful are treated as gods — untouchable, unaccountable, beyond the reach of the laws they impose on everyone else.
And the victims? In the language of Sumer, they are the lulu amelu — the mixed workers, the created ones, the beings who were made to serve. Five thousand years later, the relationship hasn’t changed. Only the names of the gods have.
The Epstein Lens: Inside the Black Box
What did Jeffrey Epstein think he was doing?
There are competing narratives, and each one tells you something about the narrator.
Narrative One: The Self-Made Predator. Epstein was a brilliant, sociopathic financial con artist who discovered that sexual access to minors could be monetized as leverage over powerful men. He built a blackmail empire through sheer audacity, fueled by Les Wexner’s money and the indifference of a legal system that treats billionaires as a protected class. He killed himself in a Manhattan jail cell on August 10, 2019, because the walls finally closed in.
Narrative Two: The Intelligence Asset. Epstein was not freelancing. His operation bore the hallmarks of a state-sponsored intelligence gathering program — the systematic recording of compromising material, the international reach, the connections to multiple intelligence agencies, including Israeli, British, and possibly Russian services. The 2011 email in which Epstein proposed seizing eighty billion dollars in frozen Libyan state assets using “British and Israeli intelligence” was not the plan of a lone predator. It was the plan of a man embedded in the machinery of state power. In this narrative, Epstein was murdered in his cell because dead men cannot testify, and the people who ran him — the people above him — decided that silence was worth the conspiracy theories.
Narrative Three: The Escape. Epstein faked his death, was smuggled out of the Metropolitan Correctional Center through channels available to intelligence agencies, and is alive — in a bunker beneath Little Saint James, or in a safe house operated by one of the governments whose secrets he kept. The camera footage that malfunctioned. The guards who fell asleep. The autopsy findings that even the pathologist hired by Epstein’s brother disputed. In this narrative, Epstein is still alive because the dirt he holds is worth more than the risk of keeping him breathing.
Each narrative reflects the worldview of the person telling it. The lone predator story comforts those who believe the system works and occasionally produces monsters. The intelligence asset story comforts those who believe in organized conspiracies and hidden hands. The escape story comforts those who believe that the powerful never truly face consequences.
The truth may contain elements of all three. Or none of them. What matters for this series is not which Epstein narrative is correct, but what all three narratives share: the recognition that one man, operating in plain sight for decades, accumulated enough leverage over enough powerful people to become untouchable — until he wasn’t.
And the system’s response to his fall was not justice. It was containment.
Roy Cohn’s Ghost
To understand how we arrived at this moment, you have to go back to a club in Manhattan in the 1970s, where a young real estate developer named Donald Trump met a lawyer named Roy Cohn.
Cohn was already legendary. He had served as chief counsel to Senator Joseph McCarthy during the Red Scare hearings. He had helped send Ethel Rosenberg to the electric chair — a woman most historians now believe was innocent. He had reinvented himself as a New York power broker, representing mob bosses like Carmine Galante and Anthony Salerno while attending society parties with Barbara Walters and Cardinal Spellman. He was a closeted gay man who persecuted gay people. He was a hypocrite on a scale that would be operatic if it weren’t so destructive.
And he taught Donald Trump everything.
Never apologize. Always attack. Claim victory regardless of the facts. Loyalty is a weapon, not a virtue. The law is not a set of rules — it is a set of leverage points. Know who the judge is. Know what the judge is hiding. Know what everybody is hiding.
“Where’s my Roy Cohn?” Trump reportedly asked in 2017, when Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation. It was not a rhetorical question. It was a confession of method. Trump’s entire operating system — from the Access Hollywood tape to the January 6th response to his handling of the Epstein files — runs on Cohn’s firmware.
The 2019 documentary Where’s My Roy Cohn? argued that Cohn was not just Trump’s lawyer but his template: a man who turned the absence of shame into a superpower, who understood that, in a media-saturated democracy, the person willing to go to the lowest depths always wins.
But there is a layer beneath even Cohn. Because the question NO OTHER GODS asks is not just “who taught Trump to operate this way?” The question is: what kind of consciousness operates this way across millennia?
The Halls of Amenti
This is where we go deeper than any cable news program or political documentary will follow.
In the Emerald Tablets of Thoth, the text attributed to Ningishzidda — Enki’s son, known to the Egyptians as Thoth and to the Greeks as Hermes Trismegistus, the “thrice-born” — describes a place called the Halls of Amenti. Deep beneath the Earth’s surface, the Tablets say, there exists a domain where beings called the Watchers have observed and directed humanity since the beginning.
These Watchers did not merely observe. They taught Thoth how to project his consciousness beyond his physical body. He learned to travel the stars in his astral form. He learned to send his awareness into human incarnation — to be born, live a human life, die, and return. Again and again. The thrice-born. The many-times-born.
This is not a metaphor to those who study the Sumerian texts alongside the Egyptian and Greek traditions. It is a technology of consciousness — a method by which a being with a lifespan of hundreds of thousands of years can walk among shorter-lived species, unseen, experiencing their reality from the inside.
Thoth was close to his father, Enki. What Thoth learned, Enki learned. What Enki knew, his half-sister Ninmah — the chief medical officer, the creator of the lulu amelu, the being the Bible calls Eve — likely knew as well. And Marduk, Enki’s firstborn son, the god who declared himself supreme above all others, who demanded the temple at Babylon and whose name echoes through every monotheistic commandment of “no other gods before me” — Marduk would have learned it too.
Now follow the logic.
If Marduk — a consciousness with access to the Halls of Amenti, with the ability to incarnate repeatedly in human form — has been inserting himself into human history at critical junctures, then patterns that historians dismiss as coincidence begin to look like signatures.
Henry VIII: a king who broke an entire religion to serve his appetites, who declared himself the supreme head of the Church of England, who married six wives and beheaded two, who rewrote the relationship between monarch and deity to place himself at the center.
And now, in the twenty-first century, a figure who has declared himself above the law, who has reshaped an entire political party in his image, who demands absolute loyalty, who instinctively reaches for the levers of institutional capture, who surrounds himself with the language of divine selection — “chosen by God,” his followers say — and who operates with a continuity of method that transcends what any single human lifetime of learning could produce.
Roy Cohn taught Trump tactics. But the operating consciousness — the pattern of demanding worship, tolerating no rivals, capturing institutions rather than building them, treating human beings as instruments of personal will — is older than Cohn. It is older than America. It is older than Rome.
It is the Marduk pattern. And if the Emerald Tablets describe a real technology — if consciousness can incarnate across millennia — then the question is not whether this sounds plausible to your modern, materialist mind. The question is whether the pattern fits.
But there is another question, and it may be the most important one in this entire series: Who wrote the warning?
Thoth did. Ningishzidda. The thrice-born. Hermes Trismegistus. The god who discovered the Halls of Amenti, learned the incarnation technology, and then — instead of using it only for himself — carved a description of the entire system into tablets and left them for humanity to find.
Why?
Thoth was always the recorder. The observer. The god of wisdom, writing, and balance. In the Egyptian tradition, he presides over the weighing of the heart in the afterlife. He does not judge. He measures. He is Enki’s son, which means he is Marduk’s brother — or half-brother—, and he watched Marduk’s lust for supremacy tear the Anunnaki apart, just as it is tearing the human world apart now.
The Emerald Tablets are either a warning or a confession. Perhaps they are both. Thoth told us exactly how the system works — archonic entities creeping into the councils, wearing the form of men, replacing substance with control — and he told us the one thing the system cannot survive: being seen.
“Only by magic could they be discovered. Only by sound could their faces be seen.”
If Marduk is the loud god, and Enlil is the authoritarian god, and Thoth is the quiet god who documented everything — then Thoth’s weapon is not power. It is disclosure. The Emerald Tablets are the original Epstein files: a record of what the gods did, left in plain sight, waiting for someone to read them and connect the dots.
The question NO OTHER GODS will pursue across its remaining installments is whether the warning was an act of rebellion or another move in a longer game. Is Thoth the whistleblower, or is he playing a position we cannot yet see?
Three Superpowers, Three Archons
George Orwell divided his dystopian world into three superpowers: Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia. Each was controlled by a totalitarian regime. Each waged perpetual war against the others — not to win, but to maintain the conditions of fear and deprivation that kept their populations docile. The war was the point. The war was the product.
In 2026, the mapping is almost embarrassingly obvious.
Oceania — Trump’s America. The ideology is not socialism but its mirror: corporate nationalism wrapped in populist language. The mechanism is identical to Orwell’s Ingsoc — the rewriting of history in real time, the demand that the population accept contradictions without protest, the elimination of institutional memory. “We have always been at war with Eastasia” becomes “We have always been aligned with Russia.” The files prove what they prove until tomorrow, when they prove something else.
Eurasia — Putin’s Russia. The ideology is Neo-Bolshevism stripped of its communist economics and rebuilt as Orthodox nationalist authoritarianism. The mechanism is active measures: the weaponization of truth, the strategic deployment of real scandals to destabilize adversaries, and the cultivation of assets in foreign governments. The files are useful as long as they do not damage the West. The moment they implicate Russian connections, they become “Western fabrication.”
Eastasia — Xi’s China. The ideology Orwell called “Obliteration of the Self” — a collective identity so total that individual consciousness dissolves into the state. China watches, waits, and builds, while the other two superpowers exhaust themselves in spectacle. The Epstein files are useful to Beijing as proof of democratic decay, a talking point for the argument that authoritarianism delivers stability and the West delivers chaos.
Three superpowers. Three ideologies. And beneath all three — if the Gnostic tradition and the Sumerian record are describing the same phenomenon in different languages — three archons.
Or perhaps three gods. Marduk, the loud god who demands worship — Trump’s energy exactly. Enlil, the authoritarian who demands obedience through fear and punishment — Putin’s operating system to the letter. And the third? If Thoth is the thrice-born, the quiet son of Enki, the one who learned to fly through stars and incarnate across millennia and record everything — is he sitting behind the Great Firewall of China, patient, silent, watching the other two burn themselves out? Is Xi the vessel of the god who doesn’t need to be worshipped, who just needs the system to function with himself at the invisible center?
Or is that too simple? Is Thoth the whistleblower who left the Emerald Tablets as evidence against his own kind? The answer may determine whether the human species has an ally among the gods, or whether every last one of them — loud, quiet, authoritarian, wise — is playing us from the Halls of Amenti while we fight over which piece of the elephant is the real one.
In Gnostic theology, the archons are parasitic entities that feed on human consciousness, particularly on fear, division, and confusion. They do not create. They capture. They take what exists — institutions, religions, governments, movements — and hollow them out from the inside, wearing the form while replacing the substance.
“Crept they into the councils, taking forms that were like unto men.”
The Emerald Tablets. Written — or channeled, or remembered, depending on your framework — thousands of years before Orwell was born.
What if Orwell’s three superpowers are not political predictions but spiritual ones? What if the perpetual war is not between nations but between archonic forces that have divided the planet into zones of control, each wearing a different mask but all serving the same function: to keep eight billion human beings from seeing the elephant?
Divide and Conquer: The Operating System
Here is what every faction, every faith, every political tribe has in common: they are all being played.
The MAGA voter who sees Clinton in the Epstein files but refuses to see Trump. The progressive who sees Trump in the files but refuses to see Clinton. The evangelical who sees divine purpose in political power but refuses to see the oldest control system on Earth operating through the very leaders they call chosen. The Israeli who sees an existential threat but refuses to see the humanity of the Palestinian. The Palestinian who sees occupation but refuses to see the Israelis who march against their own government. The Russian citizen who sees Western hypocrisy but cannot see the oligarchic rot in their own capital.
Each one holds a piece of the elephant. Each one has been told — by their media, their leaders, their algorithms, their God — that their piece is the whole animal.
Eight billion people on this planet. Eight going on nine. More computing power in a single smartphone than existed in the entirety of human civilization a century ago. More access to information, more ability to communicate, more capacity for collective intelligence than any generation in history.
And yet the species cannot see the elephant.
Not because the information is hidden. It is sitting in 3.5 million pages on a Department of Justice website. Not because the pattern is complex. A child can understand “powerful people protect each other.” Not because the solution is beyond reach. The solution begins the moment you stop identifying with your piece and start walking around the animal.
The reason humanity cannot see the elephant is that something — call it the God Virus, call it the archons, call it Marduk’s operating system, call it the Godspell — is actively preventing coherent perception. The division is not a bug. It is a feature. It is the product. It is the point.
And here is the detail that nobody is talking about, the one that hides in plain sight across every page of the Epstein files, every seat at the National Prayer Breakfast, every summit between the three superpowers, every entry on every flight log:
Every single player has a penis.
Trump. Putin. Xi. Epstein. Wexner. The sultan who received the “torture video” email. Every name Khanna read on the House floor. Roy Cohn. Marduk. Enlil. Even Thoth, the quiet one, the recorder. Every president in the Dixon cycle, going back to 1840. Every god who ever said, “No other gods before me.”
The entire architecture of domination — from the Sumerian temple to the Oval Office — is a masculine construction. It is built on leverage, territory, and control. It is maintained through the accumulation of dirt, the exploitation of vulnerability, and the systematic erasure of the one voice that could dismantle it: the feminine.
Ninmah — Enki’s beloved, the chief medical officer of the Anunnaki mission to Earth, the being who actually created the lulu amelu, who shaped the human species with her own hands in a laboratory that predated every civilization we have ever named — was written out of every subsequent religion. The divine feminine was scraped from Judaism, from Christianity, from Islam, as if she had never existed. The goddess who created humanity was replaced by a god who told humanity to kneel.
Ask yourself why.
If the system runs on dominance, then the most dangerous thing in the system is a consciousness that does not operate through dominance. A consciousness that creates rather than captures. That partners rather than commands. That sees the whole elephant because it was never invested in fighting over a single piece.
Does it take someone without a penis — someone with a feminine perspective, a creator’s perspective, a Ninmah perspective — to solve this riddle? Maybe not necessarily. But it takes someone who isn’t running the Marduk operating system. And for five thousand years, the Marduk operating system has been the only one available. Every institution, every religion, every government, every secret network filming underage girls on an island — all of it runs on the same code: I am god. There shall be no other gods before me. Kneel.
Ninmah didn’t kneel. She created. And they erased her for it.
Part 9 of this series is called WHERE IS NINMAH. We will find her. But first, we have to see the system that hid her — and it is staring back at us from 3.5 million pages of federal evidence, from a prayer breakfast where the President of the United States called a truth-teller a moron and told the audience that God chose him.
“The war is not meant to be won. It is meant to be continuous.”
The Six Million Pages
As of this writing — February 11, 2026, 4:10 in the morning, Hawaii time — the situation is this:
The Department of Justice has released approximately 3.5 million pages of Epstein-related documents, including over 2,000 videos and 180,000 images. The DOJ claims this constitutes full compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which President Trump signed in November 2025. But the DOJ itself identified over 6 million potentially responsive pages. Half were withheld.
On February 9, Congressman Thomas Massie and Congressman Ro Khanna — a Republican and a Democrat — entered a secure reading room at the Department of Justice and spent two hours reviewing unredacted versions of the files. They found that 70 to 80 percent of the FBI files were still redacted. They identified six wealthy, powerful men whose names had been hidden for no legally justified reason.
On February 10, Khanna read those names on the House floor: Salvatore Nuara. Zurab Mikeladze. Leonic Leonov. Nicola Caputo. Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, CEO of Dubai Ports World. And Leslie Wexner, the billionaire former CEO of Victoria’s Secret parent company L Brands, was labeled by the FBI as a co-conspirator in child sex trafficking.
A co-conspirator. In child sex trafficking. Labeled as such by the FBI in 2019. And his name was redacted until a congressman physically walked into the building and demanded to know why.
“If we found six men who were hiding in two hours,” Khanna said, “imagine how many men they are covering up for in those three million files.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi is scheduled to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday — tomorrow, as I write this. Lawmakers from both parties want answers. But the deeper question is not about Bondi’s testimony. It is about the structure that makes this cover-up possible, generation after generation, administration after administration, party after party.
The elephant is not the Epstein files. The elephant is the system that produced Epstein, protected him, used him, and — when he became inconvenient — disposed of him while ensuring that the system itself survived intact.
The Dixon Cycle: The Pattern That Won’t Break
In 1956, a psychic named Jeane Dixon told Parade magazine that the 1960 presidential election would be won by a Democrat who would “be assassinated or die in office.” Seven years later, John F. Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas.
Dixon became the most famous psychic in America. Presidents consulted her. Nixon called her “the soothsayer.” Nancy Reagan kept her on speed dial. Her critics — and there were many, because Dixon got far more wrong than she got right — coined a term for the tendency to remember the hits and forget the misses: “the Jeane Dixon effect.”
But Dixon identified something that transcends her personal accuracy. She identified a cycle. And the cycle is documented, regardless of whether you believe in psychic ability or dismiss it entirely.
Look at the pattern. Presidents associated with “zero years” — years ending in zero — have faced death, crisis, or catastrophic departure for over a century and a half:
1840 — William Henry Harrison. Dead in office. Thirty-one days.
1860 — Abraham Lincoln. Assassinated.
1880 — James Garfield. Assassinated.
1900 — William McKinley. Assassinated.
1920 — Warren Harding. Dead in office under clouds of scandal.
1940 — Franklin Roosevelt. Dead in office during his fourth term.
1960 — John F. Kennedy. Assassinated. Dixon’s prediction.
1980 — Ronald Reagan. Assassination attempt. He survived — but the circumstances of his survival tell a story that NO OTHER GODS will explore in depth. After the shooting, Reagan could not trust his own inner circle. He did not know if it was an inside job. He did not know if someone in his own administration had arranged the hit. The call was coming from inside the house. Reagan reached out to people he trusted outside the system — people whose stories are only now being told.
2000 — George W. Bush. Survived two assassination attempts. Left office under the catastrophic collapse of the global financial system and the disgrace of the Iraq War.
2020 — Donald Trump. He lost the election. But as Dixon’s interpreters have argued, he carried the energy of the zero-year presidency because he never conceded, launched the January 6th insurrection, and spent the next four years operating as though the office had never left him. The cycle attached to him, whether the Electoral College agreed or not.
The pattern is not always assassination. Sometimes the cycle kills the president. Sometimes it kills the presidency. Sometimes it simply burns the vessel until it cracks.
Dixon, in her broader prophecies, described a “mysterious, controversial leader” who would rise in America and divide the nation like never before — a figure who was both catalyst and crisis, both the spark and the fire. She framed this not as a one-time event but as a recurring pattern, a cycle that turns on itself roughly every twenty years, with the zero-year presidency as the fulcrum.
Now look at the calendar. It is February 2026. Reports circulating online reference Dixon’s writings and interpretations suggesting three critical inflection points in this year: a crisis in March, an escalation in July, and a departure by November. Not assassination. Not death. A forced stepping down. A collapse under the weight of controversy so massive that even the most loyal defenders cannot hold the wall.
We present this not as prophecy but as a pattern. Dixon got many things wrong. But the cycle she identified — the zero-year crisis, the rhythm of death and departure that has attached itself to the American presidency for nearly two centuries — that pattern exists whether Dixon named it or not.
And here is the question that sits beneath the pattern like a fault line beneath a city: If Trump departs — whether in November of this year or at the end of his term — what follows?
J.D. Vance.
The vice president was chosen not for his vision but for his loyalty. The man who called Trump “America’s Hitler” before he decided to become his successor. If the Marduk consciousness operates through vessels, and the vessel of Trump cracks under the weight of the Epstein files, the Prayer Breakfast blasphemy, and the accumulated gravity of a life lived in defiance of every norm, then Vance is simply the next container. The water temperature doesn’t change when you swap out the pot. The lobster is still boiling.
The cycle doesn’t end with the departure of one president. It ends when eight billion people look up from their individual pieces of the elephant and see the whole animal. It ends when the Godspell breaks.
Dixon, for all her misses, understood one thing clearly: the pattern is not about individuals. It is about a force that moves through individuals, century after century, using them up and discarding them when they are no longer useful. She called it fate. The Gnostics called it archonic. The Sumerians called it Marduk.
We call it the oldest control system on Earth.
What Comes Next
In Part 3 of this series, we will name the network. Every name that has surfaced. Every connection documented. No safe harbor. No partisan filter.
We will look at Epstein’s operation through the lens of intelligence tradecraft — the systematic manufacture of kompromat, the videotaping, the meticulous records — and ask who was the customer.
We will follow the Roy Cohn thread from McCarthy’s hearings to Trump Tower to the White House and ask: is this a man who learned tactics from a lawyer, or a pattern that has been repeating since a god named Marduk declared himself supreme in Babylon?
And we will listen to the victims. Because in the end, the only perspective that pierces the God Virus, that sees through every faction’s blindness, that refuses to be conscripted into any tribe’s narrative, is the perspective of the person who was harmed.
They were not blind men touching an elephant. They were in the room with the actual animal, and it crushed them. They know what it looks like. They have been trying to tell us for decades. And the system — the Godspell, the archonic architecture, the perpetual war machine — has been telling us not to listen.
We are listening now.
The reason for life is love. Everything else is bullshit. But the bullshit needs documenting.
NO OTHER GODS: Break the Godspell is a 12-part series examining the oldest control system on Earth — from Thoth’s warning to Epstein’s files, from the Sumerian tablets to Project 2025, from the God Virus to the partnership that breaks it.
Next: Part 3 — THE NETWORK
Subscribe to receive every installment. Share this with someone whose anti-virus is ready to fail.
References
Documents & Legal
- Epstein Files Transparency Act, H.R.4405, 119th Congress (2025-2026)
- U.S. Department of Justice Epstein Library, justice.gov/epstein
- Rep. Ro Khanna, statement on House floor, February 10, 2026
- Rep. Thomas Massie, statements regarding unredacted file review, February 9-10, 2026
Documentaries
- Active Measures (2018), directed by Jack Bryan
- Where’s My Roy Cohn? (2019), directed by Matt Tyrnauer
- The Family (2019), Netflix series
- The Apprentice (2024), directed by Ali Abbasi
Books
- George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949)
- The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean, translation by M. Doreal
- Zecharia Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles series
- Neil Freer, Breaking the Godspell (1987)
- Jeane Dixon, My Life and Prophecies (1969)
- Ruth Montgomery, A Gift of Prophecy: The Phenomenal Jeane Dixon (1965)
- Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D., and Janet Kira Lessin, works on Anunnaki and human origins
News Sources
- CNN, “DOJ releases millions of pages of documents in Epstein investigation,” January 30, 2026
- CBS News, “Massive trove of Epstein files released by DOJ,” January 30, 2026
- NPR, “Powerful people, random redactions: 4 things to know about the latest Epstein files,” February 3, 2026
- The Hill, “Khanna reads names of 6 men ‘likely incriminated’ in Epstein files on House floor,” February 10, 2026
- The New Republic, “Ro Khanna Reads Out Names of Six ‘Powerful Men’ in Epstein Files,” February 10, 2026
- PBS NewsHour, “Epstein files scrubbed to protect ‘elite, powerful men,’ Rep. Khanna says,” February 10, 2026
- TIME, “Some Redactions From Epstein Files Removed After Outcry,” February 10, 2026
- MSNBC/Maddow Blog, “The key lesson from Trump’s embarrassing National Prayer Breakfast speech,” February 6, 2026
- The New Republic, “Trump Attacks Immigrants in Wild Rant at National Prayer Breakfast,” February 5, 2026
- Baptist News Global, “Trump and Hegseth defy evangelical theology at Prayer Breakfast,” February 6, 2026
- Americans United for Separation of Church and State, statement on National Prayer Breakfast, February 5, 2026
- Boston Globe, “Trump calls Massie ‘moron’ during his National Prayer Breakfast speech,” February 5, 2026
NO OTHER GODS: Break the Godspell
Part II — The Elephant in Every Room
By Janet Kira Lessin & Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D.
Contributor: Minerva Monroe
February 11, 2026
There is an ancient parable about blind men and an elephant.
Each man touches a different part of the animal. One grips the trunk and insists it is a snake. Another wraps his arms around a leg and declares it a tree. A third runs his hands across the flank and calls it a wall. They argue. They accuse one another of ignorance. Each man feels something real, and each man mistakes his fragment for the whole.
None of them is lying. None of them sees the elephant.
That parable describes the political, spiritual, and geopolitical moment unfolding in February 2026 as millions of pages of Epstein-related documents spill into public view. The Department of Justice reports releasing nearly 3.5 million pages, including thousands of videos and images, under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Officials acknowledge that millions more pages were reviewed but not released.
Everyone holds a piece. No one holds the whole.
This essay walks around the animal. It examines the view from MAGA country, from the progressive left, from the church, from Israel and Palestine, from Moscow, from Beijing, and finally from the only vantage point that cuts through all factional blindness—the victims themselves. Then it asks a question cable news will not touch: What if the elephant is not merely corruption, but an operating system older than any party, older than any modern nation-state?
The View from MAGA Country
If you support Donald Trump, the document release feels like vindication. For years, you have argued that a protected global elite operates behind a curtain of money, media influence, and institutional immunity. You were told that powerful men trafficked in secrets and in people, that federal agencies shielded them, and that the press functioned as gatekeeper rather than watchdog.
The scope of the disclosures appears to confirm that suspicion. The scale alone—millions of pages—suggests a system, not a lone deviant.
But here is where the elephant shifts.
Power does not respect party lines. It respects power. The same infrastructure that shields one faction shields another. The same redaction process that protects a billionaire donor can protect a political ally. When Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie entered a secure DOJ reading room and later reported extensive redactions, they demonstrated something more consequential than partisan outrage: both parties encounter institutional opacity when they press too deeply.
If you cheer the exposure of your political enemies while ignoring exposure within your own camp, you are gripping the trunk and calling it a snake. The elephant remains intact.
The View from the Left
If you identify as progressive, you see a different limb. You see oligarchic networks, financial entanglements, and a long pattern of impunity for men whose wealth insulates them from consequences. You interpret the disclosures through the lens of institutional rot and geopolitical manipulation.
You also recognize the mechanics of active measures: amplify real scandals at strategic moments, frame them to maximize destabilization, and let polarization do the rest. Modern disinformation campaigns rarely invent the core event; they weaponize the truth.
Yet the left confronts the same structural challenge as the right. When the system protects a Democratic donor or shields a politically connected financier, the pattern does not change. Institutional capture does not wear a red tie or a blue tie. It wears proximity to power.
If you condemn corruption selectively, you are pressing against the elephant’s flank and insisting you have mapped the entire creature.
The View from the Church
Many evangelicals have described Trump as an imperfect vessel used for righteous ends. Scripture contains deeply flawed leaders who nonetheless alter history. That theological framing rests on outcomes: judicial appointments, abortion policy, religious liberty, public alignment with Israel.
But the Epstein disclosures do not present a question of personal imperfection. They present a question of systemic complicity. When religious platforms become stages for partisan messaging, when prayer events blur into political rallies, and when power cloaks itself in divine language, faith becomes a legitimizing instrument rather than a moral counterweight.
The risk is not that flawed men exist. The risk is that power redefines righteousness in its own image.
If faith sanctifies power without interrogating it, the elephant grows larger in the room.
The View from Israel and Palestine
In Israel and Palestine, the elephant takes a different shape.
For many Israelis, survival dominates daily consciousness. International scandal appears distant from the existential calculus of regional security. For many Palestinians, the system is not abstract. It is visible in concrete and steel, in funding streams and weapon flows, in the uneven application of international norms.
In the diaspora, Jewish communities watch two dynamics unfold simultaneously: legitimate scrutiny of powerful individuals and the resurgence of antisemitic narratives that collapse “elite wrongdoing” into “Jewish identity.” That conflation is ancient and dangerous. It thrives in moments of instability.
When scandal becomes a blunt instrument against entire peoples, the elephant’s shadow spreads beyond its original shape.
The View from Moscow
From the Kremlin’s vantage point, the disclosures serve a strategic function. They reinforce a narrative of Western hypocrisy and democratic decay. Active measures doctrine teaches that you do not need to fabricate a crisis; you amplify existing fractures and allow them to widen.
Real corruption becomes geopolitical leverage.
If you believe only one nation deploys this tactic, you underestimate the elephant’s reach.
The View from Beijing
China approaches the spectacle differently. It does not require breathless coverage or partisan combat. It studies the instability and incorporates it into a longer-term calculus.
George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four described three superpowers locked in perpetual conflict—not to achieve victory, but to maintain internal control. The war, Orwell wrote, “is not meant to be won. It is meant to be continuous.” The description resonates because it captures the structural incentive of modern power blocs: external tension stabilizes internal authority.
When democracies fracture visibly, authoritarian systems present themselves as alternatives defined by order and continuity.
The View from the Victims
Now step away from the factions.
The victims of Epstein’s operation do not experience this story as partisan chess. They experience it as trauma. They live with what was done to them in their nervous systems and their sleep.
They do not require a theory of geopolitics. They require accountability.
And here lies the clearest view of the elephant: when the state releases millions of pages while still withholding others; when elected officials must physically enter secure rooms to uncover names that should never have been concealed; when redactions protect the powerful while victims remain exposed—what you are seeing is architecture.
The architecture of impunity.
The Black Box
Public debate clusters around three narratives.
One portrays Epstein as a lone predator who built leverage through exploitation and blackmail until the system finally closed in.
Another frames the operation as intelligence-adjacent—a kompromat factory whose meticulous documentation resembles state tradecraft.
A third questions the official account of his death and suspects a deeper containment strategy.
Each narrative attracts adherents. Each reflects underlying trust or distrust in institutional integrity.
But all three share one structural truth: a single individual operated for years within elite circles because elite circles permitted him to operate. When exposure became unavoidable, the system contained the fallout without dismantling itself.
Containment preserves the elephant.
Roy Cohn and the Template of Power
Roy Cohn’s political method emphasized aggression, denial, and strategic leverage. He treated the law as terrain to dominate rather than as boundary to respect. His approach did not invent institutional ruthlessness; it refined it for modern media environments.
When you observe contemporary politics through that lens, you see more than personalities. You see pattern. You see how power sustains itself by attacking legitimacy before legitimacy can attack it.
The template survives its architects.
The Ancient Overlay
At this point, the analysis moves beyond standard political commentary.
Ancient texts—from Sumerian tablets to later Egyptian and Greek traditions—describe Watchers, archons, and rulers who assume human form while steering human institutions. You may interpret those narratives as myth, allegory, or encoded memory.
Consider them as metaphor if nothing else.
If there exists an ancient control paradigm—an operating system rooted in dominance, hierarchy, and divine entitlement—then modern institutional capture looks less accidental. It looks recursive.
In Sumerian myth, the god Marduk declares supremacy and demands exclusive worship: no other gods before him. In Gnostic tradition, archons feed on fear and division. In modern politics, leaders who demand absolute loyalty often wrap that demand in transcendent language.
Patterns persist across millennia because systems reward them.
Divide and Conquer
Every faction believes it sees clearly.
The conservative who identifies corruption on the left but not on the right.
The progressive who identifies corruption on the right but not on the left.
The believer who identifies moral decay in secular institutions but not in religious ones.
The nationalist who identifies foreign manipulation but not domestic oligarchy.
Each holds a piece.
Each has been told that his or her piece is the whole.
The information is available. Millions of pages sit online. The pattern—power protecting power—is not conceptually difficult. Yet the species struggles to synthesize.
Division is not a flaw in the system. Division is the product.
The Gendered Architecture of Domination
Across thousands of years of recorded history, a striking continuity emerges: the central figures in domination systems are overwhelmingly male. Kings, emperors, oligarchs, financiers, warlords, presidents, and the mythic gods who demanded singular allegiance share a pattern of territorial control and personal supremacy.
In Sumerian tradition, Ninmah—the creator figure, the shaper of humanity—stands in contrast to Marduk’s demand for exclusive worship. She creates rather than commands. She partners rather than subjugates.
Whether you treat that narrative as theology, mythology, or archetype, the tension remains relevant. Systems built on dominance marginalize the creative, relational perspective. They erase it, ridicule it, or subordinate it.
An operating system rooted solely in control cannot perceive the whole elephant. It can only secure its preferred piece.
The Six Million Pages
As of this writing—February 11, 2026—the Department of Justice confirms the public release of approximately 3.5 million pages of Epstein-related material. Reporting indicates that millions more pages were reviewed but not made public.
Members of Congress from both parties report significant redactions remain.
The immediate political debate focuses on which names appear and which remain hidden. The deeper question concerns structure: why does the architecture allow such selective exposure? Why must elected representatives physically enter secure facilities to access material that belongs, in principle, to the public?
The elephant is not the scandal. The elephant is the system that produces scandal, protects participants, and absorbs fallout without transforming itself.
The Pattern That Won’t Break
Observers often cite the so-called “zero-year” presidential pattern—Harrison, Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, Harding, Roosevelt, Kennedy, the Reagan attempt—as evidence of recurring destabilization at twenty-year intervals. Skeptics call it coincidence. Others call it fate.
The label matters less than the rhythm.
Political systems generate cyclical crisis because crisis justifies consolidation. When leaders rise amid division and depart amid chaos, institutions expand their authority to “restore order.” The cycle reinforces itself.
The pattern persists until citizens recognize it as pattern.
What Comes Next
Part III will examine documented names and networks without partisan filter. It will explore intelligence tradecraft, follow financial trails, and foreground the voices of victims rather than the narratives of factions.
Because in the end, the clearest perspective belongs to those who were harmed. They do not argue over which part of the elephant is correct. They encountered the animal directly.
The reason for life is love.
Everything else is noise.
But noise must be documented before it can be dismantled.
Next: Part III — The Network
Subscribe to receive every installment.
Share this with someone willing to walk around the elephant instead of fighting over the trunk.
The Elephant in Every Room | No Other Gods: Break the Godspell – Part II
By Janet Kira Lessin and Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. February 11, 2026
Contributor: Gemma Genesis
The Parable of Global Blindness
An ancient parable describes several blind men touching different parts of an elephant. One feels the trunk and identifies a snake; another touches the leg and sees a tree; a third feels the flank and calls it a wall. They fight, certain of their own reality because they felt it with their own hands. None are wrong, yet none see the elephant.
This parable perfectly captures the geopolitical reality of February 2026. As 3.5 million pages of the Jeffrey Epstein files spill across the internet, every political and spiritual faction holds a piece of the truth. No one has the whole animal. This article walks around that beast, touching every faction and every faith, before asking the question television pundits avoid: What if the elephant isn’t an animal at all, but a nameable force steering human civilization since Sumer?
The MAGA Perspective: A Thundering Vindication
For Trump supporters, the Epstein files represent the promised “storm.” The narrative of a corrupt global elite running a shadow government seems to be confirmed by 3.5 million pages of evidence. FBI documents from 2019, unredacted on February 10, 2026, by Congressman Thomas Massie, label billionaire Leslie Wexner a “co-conspirator.” The names of Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew thread through the files like a recurring nightmare.
However, the files contain a “pit” for this camp: Donald Trump’s name appears over 3,000 times. The FBI compiled lists of sexual assault allegations against the sitting president. Trump’s political tradecraft mirrors his mentor, Roy Cohn, who taught a simple, ruthless principle: Always have dirt on everyone. Never apologize.
The Leftist View: The Confirmation Bias
Progressives see Trump’s 3,000 mentions and the Roy Cohn connection as ultimate proof of the “Manchurian Candidate” theory. They point to the 2018 documentary Active Measures, which traces Trump’s Moscow ties back to 1987 and highlights his financial dependence on Russian capital.
Yet, the left’s piece of the elephant is equally sharp. Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane 26 times. The Democratic establishment protected its own for decades. On the House floor yesterday, Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) exposed six names the DOJ attempted to hide. The cover-up is bipartisan; power does not wear a jersey.
The Capture of the Church
Evangelical supporters often view Trump as an “imperfect vessel,” akin to King David or Cyrus the Great. But the Epstein files suggest complicity rather than mere character flaws. On February 5, 2026, the National Prayer Breakfast became a theater of this “institutional capture.”
President Trump mocked House Speaker Mike Johnson for wanting to pray and labeled Congressman Massie a “moron.” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced monthly prayer services at the Pentagon, merging military might with divine mandate. This mirrors the “divine right of kingship” from Sumer—a system where power itself serves as evidence of divine selection.
Geopolitical Echoes: Orwell’s Tripartite World
In 2026, the world mirrors George Orwell’s 1984. We see a global division into three blocks:
- Oceania (Trump’s America): Corporate nationalism fueled by the “rededication” of the state under a singular power.
- Eurasia (Putin’s Russia): A machine of active measures using truth as a destabilizing weapon.
- Eastasia (Xi’s China): A silent observer waiting for the West to exhaust itself in spectacle.
As Orwell noted, the war between these powers is not meant to be won; it is meant to be continuous, keeping populations obedient.
The Architect of Shame: Roy Cohn’s Legacy
To understand 2026, one must look at the 1970s, when Roy Cohn mentored Donald Trump. Cohn, the chief counsel to Joseph McCarthy, taught Trump that the law is not a set of rules, but a set of leverage points. Epstein industrialized this principle, turning a private island into a “kompromat factory.”
The Halls of Amenti and the Marduk Pattern
Going deeper than political analysis, we look to the Emerald Tablets of Thoth. These texts describe the “Halls of Amenti,” where “Watchers” have directed humanity. If consciousness can incarnate across millennia, a pattern emerges: the “Marduk Pattern.”
Marduk, the Sumerian deity who demanded supreme worship, represents a consciousness that tolerates no rivals and captures institutions. Whether it is Henry VIII or a modern president, the operating system is the same: I am God. Kneel. Thoth, the recorder, left the Emerald Tablets as a warning—a “disclosure” meant to break this cycle.
The Dixon Cycle and the 2026 Inflection Point
Psychic Jeane Dixon identified the “Zero-Year” curse, where presidents elected in years ending in zero face catastrophic ends. While the results vary, the energy persists. Reports regarding Dixon’s cycles suggest 2026 holds three inflection points: a crisis in March, escalation in July, and a forced departure by November. This is not just about a man; it is about the “Godspell”—the oldest control system on Earth—losing its grip.
The Missing Feminine: Where is Ninmah?
The Epstein files and the halls of power share one glaring commonality: they are entirely masculine constructions. From Marduk to the current geopolitical titans, the system runs on dominance and the accumulation of dirt.
Ninmah, the Sumerian “Chief Medical Officer” who helped create humanity, was systematically erased from religious history. Her perspective—one of partnership and creation—is the only thing the Marduk operating system cannot survive.
Illustrations, Titles, and Prompts
Illustration 1: The Parable
- Title: The Blind Men and the Epstein Elephant
- Description: A surrealist depiction of various political and media figures touching a massive elephant made of leaked documents and film reels. Each person is blindfolded with their party’s logo.
- Prompt: A hyper-realistic, cinematic wide shot of a giant elephant standing in a dark room. The elephant’s skin is made of millions of fluttering paper documents and glowing film strips. Blindfolded people in suits, some with MAGA hats and some with blue ‘Resistance’ pins, are touching different parts of the elephant. The atmosphere is tense and foggy, lit by the glow of the paper.
Illustration 2: The Sumerian Blueprint
- Title: The Shadow of Marduk
- Description: A double-exposure image blending a Sumerian stone relief of Marduk with a modern silhouette of a powerful political leader at a podium.
- Prompt: A striking double exposure. One layer is a weathered, ancient Mesopotamian stone carving of the god Marduk on a throne. The second layer is a sharp, modern silhouette of a political leader speaking at a press conference with many microphones. Golden cuneiform script glows faintly in the background.
Illustration 3: The Archonic Trinity
- Title: The Three Superpowers
- Description: A map of the world divided into three distinct color zones (Red, Blue, and Gold), with three looming, ethereal “Archon” figures hovering over the continents of North America, Russia, and China.
- Prompt: An editorial-style map of the world in 1984-Orwellian style. The world is divided into Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia. Above each region, a translucent, ghostly, non-human ‘Watcher’ figure with glowing eyes reaches down as if moving chess pieces. Dark, professional journalistic aesthetic.
Illustration 4: Breaking the Godspell
- Title: The Emerald Disclosure
- Description: An image of a glowing emerald tablet shattering a glass wall that displays a chaotic news feed of the Epstein files.
- Prompt: A glowing green emerald tablet hitting a massive glass screen. The screen is displaying chaotic headlines about ‘Epstein Files’ and ‘Global Crisis.’ As the tablet hits, the glass shatters, and behind it, a beautiful, calm, natural landscape is revealed. Symbolizing the breaking of a false reality.
Illustrations Package
(Realistic, cinematic, natural color grade, landscape 16:9, high detail. Avoid graphic content; keep victims represented symbolically.)
1) FEATURED HEADER IMAGE
Title: THE ELEPHANT IN EVERY ROOM
Description: A storm-lit global collage: a vast elephant-shaped shadow spans the skyline while tiny factions argue below—each holding a different “piece” (trunk, tusk, rope, wall). The mood is investigative, urgent, and sober.
Prompt: Epic cinematic photorealism, landscape 16:9. Nighttime cityscape blending subtle hints of Washington D.C., London, Moscow, and Beijing into one unified skyline. In the clouds: a colossal elephant-shaped shadow formed from drifting documents, redaction bars, and faint flight-log text—symbolic, not literal. Below: small groups of silhouetted people arguing, each holding a different object (rope, pipe, pillar, wall fragment) to symbolize partial perception. Natural colors, dramatic but grounded lighting, documentary tone, high detail, no caricatures, no gore.
2) SECTION BREAK
Title: 3.5 MILLION PAGES
Description: A mountain of documents lit by a single overhead lamp; redaction bars slice across pages like censor tape.
Prompt: Photorealistic cinematic close-up of towering stacks of legal documents in a dark archive room, one harsh overhead spotlight, dust motes visible, black redaction bars across many pages, a single folder stamped “PUBLIC RELEASE,” natural color grade, sharp detail, investigative mood, landscape 16:9.
3) MAGA VIEW
Title: THE TRUNK AS SNAKE
Description: A crowd framed by flags and phone screens, staring at a “truth drop” like a breaking-news eruption.
Prompt: Cinematic photorealism, large crowd at night seen from behind, American flags and rally signs suggested but not readable, hundreds of glowing phone screens displaying blurred document pages and headlines (no readable real text), faces tense and convinced, cool night tones with natural warm highlights, shallow depth of field, landscape 16:9.
4) THE LEFT VIEW
Title: THE WALL AS WORLDVIEW
Description: A newsroom-style scene: analysts, maps, and money trails pinned with string—truth and narrative battling for dominance.
Prompt: Photorealistic cinematic “investigation wall” in a dim room: maps, timelines, photos blurred, strings connecting nodes labeled only with generic terms like “FINANCE,” “MEDIA,” “INTEL,” “POLITICS” (no real names), laptop glow, coffee cups, tense atmosphere, natural colors, high detail, landscape 16:9.
5) THE CHURCH VIEW
Title: PRAYER BREAKFAST: INSTITUTIONAL CAPTURE
Description: A grand ballroom stage with a podium under warm lights; behind it, a faint overlay of a crown/temple silhouette—power wearing faith.
Prompt: Cinematic photorealistic ballroom with a podium and American flags out of focus, audience in suits and formal attire, warm overhead lighting, subtle symbolic overlay in the background of an ancient temple crown shape made of light (very faint), mood: solemn, unsettling, no caricatures, landscape 16:9.
6) ISRAEL & PALESTINE
Title: THE FLANK COVERED IN GRIEF
Description: Two mothers on opposite sides of a divide, both holding candles—mirrored sorrow, no propaganda.
Prompt: Photorealistic cinematic split-composition: two women (faces partially turned away for privacy), each holding a candle and a small folded paper, a barrier wall suggested abstractly between them (not identifiable location), soft evening light, natural colors, quiet dignity, no gore, no political signage, landscape 16:9.
7) MOSCOW / ACTIVE MEASURES
Title: THE WEAPONIZATION OF TRUTH
Description: A hand selects real headlines from a pile and slides them into a projector—truth as ammunition.
Prompt: Cinematic close-up of gloved hands sorting paper headlines and documents (generic, unreadable), feeding them into an old-fashioned slide projector aimed at a wall map of the world, cold ambient light, natural color grade, high detail, espionage mood, landscape 16:9.
8) BEIJING / THE WATCHFUL SILENCE
Title: THE NOTE-TAKER
Description: A quiet high-rise office overlooking a vast city; one figure watches—not reacting, just recording.
Prompt: Photorealistic cinematic interior, high-rise window view of a massive modern city at night (generic), a single figure in silhouette writing notes at a desk, minimalism, calm tension, natural color grade, crisp reflections, landscape 16:9.
9) THE VICTIMS (SYMBOLIC)
Title: THE NAMES WE DON’T SAY
Description: A row of empty chairs with small lights on each seat; presence without exposure.
Prompt: Cinematic photorealism, a dim room with a circle of empty chairs, each chair holding a small lit candle or soft glowing orb, a box of tissues on a table, gentle morning light through blinds, compassionate tone, no bodies, no explicit content, landscape 16:9.
10) KOMPROMAT FACTORY
Title: THE BLACK BOX
Description: A labyrinth of security monitors and camera lenses—recording as leverage, not protection.
Prompt: Photorealistic cinematic shot of a dark control room: multiple security monitors showing blurred hallways and doorways (no identifiable people), a wall of camera lenses, cables, timestamp overlays unreadable, moody lighting, natural colors, high detail, landscape 16:9.
11) ROY COHN’S GHOST
Title: THE TEMPLATE
Description: A 1970s Manhattan club vibe—smoke, suits, and a handshake that changes history.
Prompt: Cinematic photorealistic period scene: 1970s upscale Manhattan lounge, warm tungsten lighting, cigarette smoke haze, two men in suits shaking hands in the foreground (faces not clearly identifiable), champagne glasses, power-broker mood, natural film grain, landscape 16:9.
12) THOTH’S WARNING (MYTHIC OVERLAY)
Title: “CREPT THEY INTO THE COUNCILS…”
Description: A modern council chamber overlaid with faint ancient glyphs—form intact, substance replaced.
Prompt: Epic cinematic photorealism with subtle fantasy overlay: modern government chamber at night, empty seats, polished surfaces reflecting faint serpent-like distortions (symbolic, not monsters), translucent ancient glyphs drifting like dust in the air, a distant luminous ibis-headed Thoth silhouette in the shadows (abstract, respectful, not cartoon), natural colors, high detail, landscape 16:9.
Updated References and Sources
(Formatted to match what you cited, with key primary sources added.)
Documents & Legal
- U.S. DOJ press release: “Department of Justice Publishes 3.5 Million Responsive Pages in Compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act” (Jan. 30, 2026).
- Reporting on remaining redactions and named individuals (Khanna/Massie): Axios; Guardian; ABC Australia; Al Jazeera.
Prayer Breakfast
- Transcript sources / reporting on “rededicate America” and Massie remark: Senate Democrats transcript; PBS; Axios; EWTN; Rev transcript.
- Reporting on Hegseth remarks: Baptist News Global; Word&Way/Public Witness.
Documentaries / Context
- Active Measures (2018), dir. Jack Bryan (background reference).
