Break the ANUNNAKI GODSPELL: Tim Leary’s & Neil Freer’s Legacies*
by Enkiupdated on Leave a Commenton Break the ANUNNAKI GODSPELL: Tim Leary’s & Neil Freer’s Legacies*
From Anunnaki, Evolution of the Gods * by Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. & Janet Kira Lessin
BREAK THE GODSPELL & ACCESS SPIRITUALITY
NEIL FREER
Neil Freer (1943–2016), was a generalist, futant, futurist, lecturer, author, poet, and contributor to the Arlington Institute think tank. Neil and his wife, Ursula, lived in the Eldorado area. Neil held a BA in English and did his graduate work in Philosophy and Psychology at the New School for Social Research. He taught college courses in Philosophy and History of Religion, gave private and public seminars and lectures, and made over three hundred radio and TV interviews.
Neil wrote Breaking the Godspell, ’87, which explores the archaeological, astronomical, and genetic proof for our being a genetically engineered species and presents the ramifications of this new paradigm of human nature that resolves the Creationist-Evolutionary conflict.
In God-Games: What Do You Do Forever?, he explores how we will live when, individually and collectively, we attain the unassailable integrity afforded by the restoration of our true, part-alien genetic history. He outlines the racial maturity of the new planetary civilization and describes the new human.
Neil published Sapiens Rising: The View From 2100 through www.amazon.com on Kindle (only, no paper, no trees falling).
Neil was invited to give a keynote speech in February 2010 at the International UFO Congress. His presentation was advertised as Sapiens Rising to Cosmic Citizenship: The Script for a Stellar Species Performance. As a philosopher, futurist, futant, contactee, and generic human, Neil says: We are already into a profound transmutation which will characterize this 21st century as our species Century of Transformation. We are being invited into the stellar society and have the keys to integrate our past and present as the new humans and meet the conditions for acceptance. Let us reclaim our planetary identity and dignity, our part-alien cosmic credentials, and prepare to matriculate into the heavens, into stellar society as, finally, Sapiens Sapiens, the truly doubly wise. There are dangers, but let us face them together. I stand to speak for all of us, a young but wise species, to urge us all to make it so for our children.
SAPIENS ARISE, NIBIRU’S HERE
“NIBIRU’S HERE & ETs like us but bigger adapted us with local homonids mixed with Neanderthal genes to slave for and worship them as gods,” philosopher Neil Freer tells Sacred Matrix hosts Janet Kira and Dr. Sasha Lessin.
Freer explains Sir Laurence Gardner’s research. Gardner had access to royal libraries where he traced how the extraterrestrials from Nibiru bred Jesus.
Jesus begat the line of the power elite that chains us to god-fearing religions that make us kill and exploit each other.
The GRAIL’s not an item but the bloodlines of the kings.
Freer says, “Zecharia Sitchin and Sir Laurence Gardner deserved Nobel prizes for their profound and meticulous scholarship.”
Freer identifies three major coverups:
1) General Alien Presence – Several alien species are visiting us,
2) Anunnaki – They created us, and our actual nature/design is part Anunnaki/alien,
3) Nibiru Planet X (Wormwood) – It exists, is inbound, and sometimes creates catastrophic events that affect the entire Earth and all its peoples, creatures, and features.
Freer says, “We deserve transparency, truth. We already have techno fixes for all that ails humanity and our world. Disclosure and contact will resolve all the rest. We move into a paradigm of cooperation, past competition. Time to break the Godspell, reveal the truth behind our creation and the foundations of our religions and political systems. We need full disclosure. We are already being contacted, and disclosures are coming from within, from Experiencers and Contactees who bravely come forth and are reporting their contact.”
MANIFESTO FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE 21ST CENTURY
This era of global transition will result in the redesign of the fundamentals of human activity. People and organizations that look for new ways to deal with unprecedented events will be better prepared to survive and prosper. To be part of that group, you must be willing to unleash yourself from the past and be willing to take risks. You must objectively search for novel tools and perspectives. John Petersen
The Status Quo: Totem and Taboos and You …. and I
Our planet, this agonizingly beautiful little planet, is on hold. Seeking relief and release, in a perverse ecology we recycle outmoded, primitive paradigms, shuffling our feathers-and-molasses confusion between hands. In a time when we are required to deal with the politics of non-overlapping alien realities, we are not able to resolve the separations caused by our overlapping intra-species realities. It has rendered us theologically inane, philosophically naive, scientifically cramped, socially isolated, ecologically damaged, politically challenged, and intellectually bewildered.
It is clearly evident, after thousands of years of trial and disastrous errors, that the relief and release from the racially adolescent immaturity we seek as individuals and as a planetary species will not come from yet another econopolitical experiment. Yet another U.N.-negotiated conflict resolution, religious ecumenical conference, new-age vision, academic philosophy, imposition of theocracy, new constitutional political format, or even a new twist on the MAD scenario, or war to end all wars.
The purpose of this paper is to point out an overarching new paradigm that redefines and, thereby, resolves and supercedes the most fundamental cause of the divisions and conflicts between us and illuminates the now and future trajectory of the new planetary human.
A very fundamental, critical question, therefore: Is it even possible to arrive at an overarching new planetary paradigm so comprehensive and robust that it corrects, subsumes, completes, and outmodes all previous partial paradigms, explains all our previous explanations, with the scope and power to unify and pacify the planet? Unequivocally, yes. We are not incapable of getting off “maybe”. We are blocked only by primitive, antique legacies, and the way to expunge them from the fabric of our cultures is now available to us.
How adolescent a species are we?
We are accustomed to analyzing, evaluating, and reacting to significant positive or negative events in the public and private sectors in terms of political, military, economic, scientific, psychological, sociological, or religious factors and ramifications. We do this in the context of a primitive economic, competitive mammalian politic based on territory and the defense of limited survival resources when national boundaries have been rendered meaningless and free energy sources are already available. The least evolved among us, in a perversion of the word “conservative, preserve their wealth, built on a limited energy supply, by deliberately suppressing developments that would make it limitless. As a most recent example, if confined to this context of mammalian politics, we will surely see the “end of the west” — the “wild”, Paleolithic, west at least — and the rise of the European Union in its turn within the dreary cycles of competitive mammalian economics. Then the “rise” of China, perhaps.
Politically, we have created governments peopled primarily by the cynically devolved, many sincere, perhaps, but myopic, in a time when sincerity alone is tragically inadequate. We are still working through systems of representation by strangers when direct, instantaneous input from the entire population is quite possible. Representation, due to antiquated polling and analytical methods, therefore produces mediocre politicians from the middle of the demographic bell curve, where the most votes lie. Domestically, we are a dead poet’s society, paralyzed and waiting, perennially, for the future we have probably already terminated at the stake, in the courtroom, the boardroom, the lab, the dean’s office, the classroom, for violating a taboo….
Ideologically, philosophically, the four criterion bases which we generally use to determine the truth or falsity, beneficence or harmfulness, morality or immorality of information, theology, philosophy, science and “new age” values, rattle around in a criteria vacuum with little overlap and major conflicts because each tends to define a human being and the meaning of human existence in a pretty different way. Among some humans, there is a slinking cynicism, an often unspoken, viral attitude in human society that holds the view that it is impossible to get out of the criteria vacuum, to initialize a common ground; impossible to get past the communicatory barriers of turf and custom, belief and taboo. When talking about humans, we are largely ineffectual because we are Babel-factored, literally talking past each other about different entities.
Technologically, we are eager and close to creating artificial intelligence and consciousness, yet we cannot agree on the nature of our own consciousness.
“A people without history is not redeemed from time.” T. S. Eliot
How primitively adolescent are we? Most fundamentally and amazingly, we do not have a consensual, planetary, generic definition of what a human being is. We disagree about how we really came into existence and what the nature of our developmental process is. We disagree as to the facts, interpretation, and understanding of our species’ history. We have treated the sociobiological event of our beginning as a species as if we could never be sure if it ever really occurred. We have not resolved nor integrated our genesis and our history as a species, and, therefore, are at a loss to understand our real nature and future trajectory. That we do not see this as a profound puzzle is further proof of our species’ primitive naiveté.
These problems translate into issues related to our children and their education. Currently, we matriculate our young, these amazing, parallel- processing, relativistic, quantum-jumping, multi-dimensional consciousnesses, semi-illiterate and naive for fear of them questioning our shambling senilities. In a time when we need to stretch our historical sense to allow for the visitation of our planet by alien species from before our origins, we teach them drum-and-trumpet mammalian history, fleshed out with desiccated, parochial, political platitudes. We teach our own children, privately, generally the same platitudes and clichés we were taught, and brand them with the same religious, scientific, and intellectual taboos we were tattooed with as children, and expect that they will somehow be ready to do better than we and perhaps even step into stellar society. Whether we deny it or not, our children show all the signs of being prepared; they are underwhelmed and overqualified. We feel it. Nevertheless, we do not teach philosophy to our minors, even though they are capable of calculus. We do not allow a teacher in the public school system to teach our children anything important because we do not agree about what to teach them, and because we do not agree about who and what we are. We do not educate our children in the management, refinement, and evolution of their personal spectrums of consciousness because we disagree on what that spectrum includes. And the children are literally our future, we in the future.
The current status quo, therefore, at its most fundamental stratum, is simply a continuation of the primitive theo-political conflicts we have known for the past three thousand years. The major obstacles that are most fundamentally influencing and hindering our planetary understanding and progress are cultural legacies, cultural lock-ins that are with us as the deepest dyes in the tapestries of our cultures, locked in legacies that influence our thinking, our science, our logic, and our concepts of ourselves. We are too close to them, or think that they do not affect us, or that they have been dealt with in the scientific or academic world long ago, or that we can ignore them. We deal, furthermore, with all these problems in a Paleolithic manner from the isolated towers of Cartesian-Newtonian oligarchies.
It has been said that the world’s most complex mechanism comes without an owner’s manual. We have many different and conflicting definitions of what a human is and several conflicting “owner’s manuals” by which a human is supposed to operate. The word “owner” is the key: there are two major “owner’s manuals” in the form of the Bible and the Koran, two in the form of The Book of Changes (The I Ching) and the Book of the Tao. The I Ching and the Book of the Tao are instruction manuals in which the “owner” is understood as the human consulting them. In the case of the Bible and the Koran, the “owners” are not the humans but the deities associated with the manuals. This relationship of “owner” to subject, deity to servant or slave, is understood by the vast majority as “religion”. We hardly question this concept. Those who do question it have often been killed by those who do not. Those of one slave-code religion have often killed those of another slave-code religion over whose owner is the only real Owner, or which code is the correct one. Ultimately, these slave-code definitions determine our cultures and their legacies and traditions, and are the most basic cause of the separations, divisions, conflicts, and wars between humans.
A Self-Indictment
Part 1, obviously, constitutes a very broad, serious, and daunting self-indictment. I posit a caveat: When I name names and institutions, critically or otherwise, I intend them as part of us, as a self-indictment: it is simply we doing these things to ourselves. Let us be easy on ourselves, however, since we are the only game like us on the planet, the only example we can work with, the inadequate conceptual boxes we inhabit are of our making, but also ours out of which to break. If these negatives were all there were, then the fears of those in future shock would be vindicated. If I had no suggestions, solutions, answers, or resolutions to offer, I would not have written this paper. So the second half of this paper respectfully offers an overview and paradigm that can take us, from the perspective of a deepened knowledge of our species and ourselves, to a new level of racial maturity and a degree of freedom previously unavailable. The new synthesis subsumes partial glimpses of a new politic, humanistic new world order, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or Western mysticism, a third culture, spiritualized psychology, all knowledge united in a grand consilience, or cerebral turning points. We now have the keys to integrate our past, present, and future through the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor for achieving planetary unity.
The Primary Key to Unlocking the Locked-in Legacies
“What is emerging now is a sense that something else — neither mechanistic (Darwin) nor theistic (the Bible) — is going on. But mainstream science will have none of this ambiguity, and reactively tars all non-Darwinian notions with the broad brush of “biblical superstition.” The net result has become a sort of silly high drama in which one flavor of pseudoscience attempts to do battle with another.” John Anthony West
While the evolutionists and the creationists have been battling it out through dramatic episodes of the Scopes soaps, another explanatory paradigm has been developing exponentially, which subsumes, corrects, and makes obsolete, specifically relative to the human species, both of those rather primitive paradigms. While the scientific imperialists and the religious dogmatists have thought that they owned the discussion by proprietarily boxing the argument and defining the binary options, the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin, has advanced a robust and coherent paradigm of our genesis and unique history that, if true, —– and I am convinced that it is after working critically with it for 28 years —– is profound, comprehensive, and fundamental enough to enable us to rewrite the entire history of our beginnings and the planet astronomically, evolutionarily, paleontologically, archaeologically and, literally, redefine ourselves as humans. Sitchin’s thesis illuminates that ancient conflict with Nobel prize quality research, renders the, by now, Monty Pythonesque arguments outmoded, subsumes and corrects creationism, redefines Darwinism as well as its latter day detractions. He has been able to do this because he reads Sumerian as well as the Semitic languages, including ancient and Modern Hebrew, and is steeped in the history. He has had the advantage of access to the accumulated scholarship and archaeological material from the Middle East rediscovered only in the last one hundred and fifty years.
Genesis Revisited: The Sitchin Paradigm
Zecharia Sitchin, one of two hundred Sumerian scholars on the planet who can read a cuneiform clay tablet like you and I can read a newspaper, has demonstrated that the Anunnaki/Nefilim (Sumerian/Hebrew: those who came down [from the heavens] ), the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient civilizations from the tenth planet in our solar system, Nibiru, colonized Earth 432,000 years ago and created the human species 200,000 years ago, by genetically crossing their genes with Homo Erectus. Corroboration comes from evidence for Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory, the Infrared search by the IRAS satellite in ‘83-’84; genetically from the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve”; anthropologically from the “out of Africa” data placing our genesis in Central Africa 200,000 years; enigmatic ooparts and close to two million pieces of artifact and documentation recovered directly from the ancient civilizations. Our modern science has provided a means of identifying advanced science in the ancient past, previously thought of as fantastic even for us. Advances in scientific discoveries in genetics, mitochondrial DNA research, space and planetary science, archaeology, paleontology, anthropology, linguistics, and even metallurgical physics have enabled Sitchin to demystify the Anunnaki’s advanced technologies and to identify and explain ooparts. We have progressed from being their slave animals to a limited partnership and, since they phased off Earth, are now phasing out of a 3000-year traumatic transition to racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component.
Central to the history of the Anunnaki’s occupation of the planet was the interaction between two brothers, Enlil and Enki. Enki was their chief scientist, responsible with his sister Ninhursag, their chief medical officer, for the genetic creation of our species. Enki, obviously, was sympathetic towards humans and promoted our interests. Enlil, eventually known as Jehovah/YHWH, of the Old Testament, maintained the position that humans were to remain slaves, totally subservient to the Anunnaki and him especially.
The Traumatic Transition
The Anunnaki phased off this planet at the latest around 1250 B.C. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we humans have been going through a very traumatic transition to racial independence. Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who knew and knows what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return, or when they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals learned under the Anunnaki, and sometimes disagreement and strife broke out between them. Religious ritual is the transmutation of palace servant duties. The serving of favorite roasted meats on the Anunnaki table became the offering of “burnt offerings” on the table, now become an “altar”; the transportation of the Anunnaki local ruler on a dais became a procession of statues; the Anunnaki palaces became “temples”, etc. The Anunnaki were, clearly and unambiguously, known to the humans who were in contact with them as imperfect, flesh-and-blood humanoids (taller and huskier than we are, male and female, the males bearded). We look like they look because we are half Anunnaki. It was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on, conveniently mythologized. Breaking the godspell has seen us go through the stages of abandonment to dissociation, transmutation, religion, rebellion, and now to recovery. We have been looking to the sky where they went for some three thousand years, caught in cargo cult religions. We are ready to step out of racial adolescence.
Ramifications and Resolutions
The “occult” is time-release packages of advanced technological information entrusted to us in “crash courses” in civilization, often lost through time, now being recovered through the clues and recognition afforded by our own science. Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, artifacts, and “out of place” in time are remnants of lost technology and knowledge. Transcendental experience is redefined in terms of the dimensional expansion of consciousness and perception. We are rapidly evolving to habitual four-dimensional consciousness. Transcendence is conscious metamorphic dimensional exploration, participatory expansion at the leading edge of our special-case evolution. The totems and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can get off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap and complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic enlightenment.
Mythology is our greatest myth. We can move beyond the interpretation of the gods as myth, Jungian archetypes, and schizophrenic hallucinations. History as hallucination and “myth-information, after two hundred years of explanatory failure, although still hiding behind tenure in the university and between the glossy pages of new age magazines, is a dead issue.
Why is the Sitchin paradigm so pivotal? It is the meta-paradigm that affords the potential to remove the resultant, stultifying, locked-in legacies that have kept up separate and enervated for millennia. The new paradigm is so encompassing and penetrating that it is a unique meta-wild card: it redefines every cardinal element of human existence that we think we have understood, including a redefinition of our evolution, all our cultures, our religions, and of our very selves.
Those who talk of a singularity, a shearing drop to extreme novelty and fundamental revolutionary change at some near point in our future that is so profound that it will change human nature, do not have to look any further than the Sitchin paradigm. It is there for the acceptance, and it will rewrite the entirety of our history and redefine human nature. After a century and a half of examination and attempted explanation —- and suppression —- of the historical, archaeological, anthropological, and astronomical evidence accumulated, no other explanatory paradigm comes close to the totally coherent, robust, and logical Sitchin thesis. Can and will it be improved or corrected? Certainly.
Just within the time of the writing of this paper, there has been a report of the discovery, by satellite scan, of a city, two miles by five miles in area, under thirty feet of water in the ocean twenty-five miles off the northwest coast of India. Preliminary carbon dating of dredged materials from the site indicates an age of 9,000 years, placing it earlier than Sumer. The histories of India (declared a myth by the British because they were older than the Empire) speak in detail about civilizations and humans from the very remote past, and mention this city by name.
What appears to be a city has been reported off the coast of Cuba, at an astounding 2100 feet below the surface, discovered by professional treasure-wreck hunters using sophisticated equipment.
The Takenouchi documents and artifacts, ancient treasures of the Japanese Emperor, guarded for 2500 years by the family of the highest Shinto priest caste, speak of an alien civilization that came here from space and founded the human race.
All these facts and histories need to be studied thoroughly and integrated with the histories and data from the entire planet. We have much work to do. The planetary benefits will be enormous. Besides the obvious general advantage of working from a consensual understanding and definition of what a generic human is, we can eliminate the characterization of the perennial conflicts as between “progress and piety” or between creationism and evolution, or between science and faith. The new paradigm finally and conclusively resolves the creation-evolutionary conflict, specifically concerning our unique genesis. If the new paradigm is substantially correct then the box is illusory, the creationists are only half wrong and the evolutionists are only half right: there was a creation but it took place in a genetic laboratory; there is a human evolutionary process but it was interrupted by the Anunnaki inserting their genes into the Homo Erectus gene code, a very pragmatic, non-Darwinian kind of interference. We were created, and we are evolving, but both in unique ways.
In short, the entire set of world views, theistic, theo-political, cultural, philosophical, and scientific that purport to explain our genesis, history, and development as a species, are about to be replaced as we finally recover from racial amnesia. The revolution is inevitable. It will probably take a century to fully accomplish socially because of the sweepingly profound nature of the resulting change, the natural resistance of the established institutions, and the need to reeducate and transition without disorientation. The new worldview is gradually taking hold, cannot be ignored, and is waiting in the wings. It is only a matter of time. A unique and vital characteristic is that it addresses, explains, and redefines the root source of all the world’s ancient religions daily, so that no particular religion can claim privileged status. Religion, as we know it, will be understood in the context of our unique history.
The significance and ramifications of this tremendous body of work, correlated with findings from all other disciplines, as they bear on our present and future, have been my primary focus since 1976, when I began work on Breaking the Godspell, the reaction to which has been predictable and certainly not dull.
There is no better example of the Galileo effect (we will not look through your telescope because we know what you say you see can’t be so) in the academic and scientific arenas than the reaction to the Sitchin paradigm. Campus, scientific, and theological imperialism and the fields of anthropology, archaeology, and astronomy, particularly, have tried all the usual unprofessional, unscholarly, shunning, chest thumping, fang baring, proprietary turf posturing and ad hominem attacks through teeth clenched in tenure tetanus, but the thesis becomes more and more robust as new evidence comes in continually from archaeology, anthropology, astronomy, genetics and other disciplines. If Darwin’s thesis was a blockbuster, Sitchin’s thesis is a hydrogen bomb. We may have been able to afford to dally with Darwin and defer to religion for as long as we have, but the rapid changes in modern times will force us to consider Sitchin’s thesis seriously and intensely on a much shorter basis.
Still Dallying with Darwin
Of course, most scientists and sophisticated scholars consider themselves enlightened because they espouse some form of Darwinian evolutionary theory as the party line, although there are serious arguments even within the scientific arena about the full validity of the Darwinian thesis. Generally, philosophers and scientists apologize if they think they are even possibly sounding like creationists, spend most of their energy in either promulgating some version of Darwinian evolution or attacking what they judge to be its too radical application, get entangled in arguments about whether Darwinian evolution can be invoked to explain human creativity, even aesthetics, and generally put down any other explanation out of hand.
The general thesis of the evolutionist, therefore, reads like this: the acceptance of evolution as the mechanism by which we came about causes us to understand that we are a collection of biological molecules, interacting with each other as in a mechanism, according to well defined laws and rules derived from physics and chemistry —- although not all known or understood by humans as yet. Defining consciousness within this biological model is still a pivotal problem: some say it is simply an epiphenomenon, an effect of the operation of all the parts of the brain working in consort, some say it is the subjective self-perception of herself or himself by the individual, some say it must be based in some “new stuff”, some new physics or chemistry that we don’t yet understand.
Across the general population, however, we do not even agree on whether we are evolving, what the process really is if, indeed, we are evolving, from what source and how we began, and in what direction and on what trajectory, whatever that process is, we are headed. We do not agree, even more fundamentally, as to what criteria to use to judge these matters. We are not discussing the same entity. Creationists, obviously, do not think of humans as having evolved in the past or as evolving in the present. If we disagree that we are evolving, can evolve, or whether any evolution of a species or individual must be by mindless Darwinian mechanisms, or whether there are effective methodologies for expediting conscious self-evolution, we will remain at a standstill. It is, however, pretty ironic that even most who hold some evolutionary view of humankind evolving to human status in the past do not seem to think in terms of humans evolving in the present, much less to have a well-defined conceptualization of what that process might be.
Charles Darwin published his arguments for evolution in 1859, 143 years ago. Schliemann opened the buried Pandora’s box of our real archaeological history in 1873, one hundred and twenty-four years ago. Sitchin, having gained the advantage of discoveries in archaeology, astronomy, space travel, genetics, and linguistics as elucidating and explanatory tools, published first book in 1976, already over a quarter century ago. Using this rough chronology as a guide, we might anticipate, even with some exponential acceleration, that the initial general recognition and acceptance of the Sitchin paradigm will not occur for perhaps some fifty years. We really can’t afford, however, to see Kuhn’s thesis that scientific revolutions take place only by the old guard dying off rather than by an acceptance through careful study, critique, and proving out, borne out once again.
Bicameral Genetics As Sociobiology 1A
In searching for a word to clearly distinguish between the various Darwinian-type theories of evolution usually applied to all species, including ours, and our unique evolution as revealed by our history, science, and genetics, I have found it convenient to invent the word “Real evolution. Clearly, we are evolving, but in an accelerated, unique way, having come into existence through a genetic engineering project. That we have adapted, loosely in a Darwinian sense, over time is also true, but the fact that we realize we can control and manipulate our real evolutionary progress and direction goes far beyond the concept of natural selection through random genetic mutations.
Consider the facts of our unique genetics and differences from other anthropoids or humanoids. Current investigation says our genetics are about 98 percent the same as a chimp’s. Regardless, that two, perhaps only one percent, obviously makes a vast difference. We have 46 chromosomes; primates have 48. The fusion of the second and third chromosomes in primates remains a mystery. Even today, the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor species for us; Homo Erectus is currently being promoted. We were contemporaneous with Neanderthals or even preceded them. We showed up too suddenly in the fossil record. We present with very many startling, noticeable differences from primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species, are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages; small flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone density; our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management are entirely different. Human females do not have an estrus cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to say the very least. It becomes pretty apparent why we (as a product of a melding of two racial gene codes, where pragmatic purposes conditioned quality control) have some four thousand genetic defects and counting, rather than none to a handful, as all other species do, in light of the complexity of the merging. Homo erectus, our half ancestor, took a million years to go from rough flaked stone tools to smooth ones. You could hardly notice any change. We have come from square one to going to Mars in only some 200,000 years. If the Sitchin paradigm is correct, all these facts are explained easily. If we ignore this body of information as we read out and work with the human genome, we handicap ourselves unnecessarily and deprive ourselves of valuable clues and understanding. Darwinian principles may generally apply to hominid species before us, but they clearly do not apply to our unique synthetic genesis and subsequent development except as a minor theme in our climatic and incidental regional adaptations.
If the Anunnaki were interested only in engineering what clearly amounted to disposable units, then it may reasonably be inferred that the completeness of the engineering would not have to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this author, the basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and defects we present. It has been argued, theoretically, that, although the vast majority of the species on this planet present with only a few typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative complexity of our organism. However, we are not much more genetically complex than even the higher primates, and this argument does not hold.
Sociobiology, as introduced and propounded by E. O. Wilson, is founded on Darwinian evolutionary theory and the “unappealing proposition” that genetic variation and chance alone are the causes of humankind’s existence, implying a complete biological determinism. There is difficulty, however, in accounting for the disconcertingly rapid accelerations apparent in our species’ brief history, in which our cultural and consciousness developments have rapidly outrun the slow genetic mutational and chance factors. It may well be that we are totally determined in our action and thought by our biology, but the very fact that we can recognize that possibility and discuss it begs the question: How, then, are we determined? Wilson’s honesty leads him to acknowledge that we have reached a point at which we can consciously influence the course of our evolution. The new paradigm affords a context and perspective for understanding our species’ precocity in terms of the rapid ascendance of our advanced Anunnaki genetic base. We can return to the subject of man’s ultimate nature with confidence, freedom to radically experiment and explore with understanding and humor. The exact reductionistic science that would honestly insist that we are totally determined by an infinitely regressive loop of ultimately quantum mechanical events is already telling us that we are determined to transcend in an infinitely progressive loop of fractal-like expansions. If we are totally determined, we are clearly determined to choose our own determinism.
The fact that we have modified since our inception in accordance with Darwinian adaptations to general climatic, regional, and cultural vectors becomes a minor theme in the overview of ourselves as the precocious leading edge of a rapidly metamorphosing synthesized species, driven by our bicameral genetic engine. The “unappealing proposition” loses its sting: the truth, regardless of its content, tends to set one free. The new paradigm thoroughly explains the seeming anomalies of acceleration, ooparts, and syncretisms so apparent in the human situation, and offers a definitive explanation of why our species’ “biological evolution is always quickly outrun by cultural change.
A Planetary Focus for the Genome Project and Genetic Research
The Sitchin paradigm provides a comprehensive context for understanding and explaining the enigmatic facts and anthropological anomalies of the Darwinian model of our species’ existence, which we have already amassed. It provides the context and data to bring together the efforts of geneticists and genome projects, often scattered for various reasons, to focus on correcting and perfecting the genetic code, eliminating all disease and handicaps, and providing us with the option of immortality.
Immortality is a pivotal topic for all to consider and learn from across all phases of Anunnaki-human history. We know, directly from the records, that the Anunnaki did not give us the relatively extreme longevity or immortality they possessed by conscious, deliberate decision. It did not fit their purposes: we were invented as slave workers. The records also show, however, that, over time, a handful of humans were granted immortality also by deliberate decision as a reward for being good subordinates in various roles, usually as kings/foremen or for carrying out some critical mission. Another lesson: there may be identifiable gene sequences that control the aging and dying process that are clearly manipulatable, suggesting that we can rectify their possible deliberate suppression.
During the genetic investigations now in process, therefore, it would be valuable for geneticists, at a minimum, to constantly inspect the decipherment results for signs of gene merging, to develop protocols to determine such, if needed, and to follow the clues mentioned herein. By doing so, interpretations and explanations may be facilitated, progress accelerated, and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved. The information gained would, reciprocally, be a significant, pivotal, invaluable spin-off contribution to our species’ evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural genetic history. Understanding our bicameral gene code in the context of the new paradigm will facilitate the elimination of the schizoid puzzles in our collective and individual psyches and the correction and perfecting of our genetics.
Immortality, An Emergent Wild Card
How primitive are we? The view from 2100 says very primitive indeed: we are only beginning to approach the time when all diseases are preventable and curable. We still pollute our environment and cause ourselves disease. We have not overcome aging and death, yet we fear immortality. We get born, no owner’s manual, to often dubiously qualified, puzzled and puzzling parents, subject to a multitude of diseases, struggle to make sense out of what the hell existence on this planet in this universe is all about and how to deal with it, wonder why there are so many conflicting philosophies and institutions claiming cosmic franchising and, often, why the universe seems so unfair and then we die. We are generally conditioned by theocultural traditions to accept these bizarre conditions as “normal” and the will of some god.
If we rethink our situation in terms of our restored history, however, things make a great deal more sense, though there may not be a planetary cure or relief for some of them for now. If we recognize that we are the product of a genetically engineered melding of two quite different gene codes, literally a bicameral species, displaying a decidedly non-Darwinian kind of evolutionary development, just now beginning to step out of racial adolescence, only now beginning to grasp our racial psychology, possessing a gene code that, significantly and disconcertingly, manifests four thousand and counting potential genetic defects, struggling desperately with a short life span and specific mortality, we will know precisely who and what we are. By enabling us to break the godspell, we are freed to collectively work toward planetary goals in genetic science: the correction of defects in our genetic code, the elimination of diseases in all of mankind, and the provision of the option of immortality to all.
In the greatest perspective, perhaps we should recognize from the outset that immortality will be both a new and awesome plateau of human existence offering as yet probably undreamed potential, and yet, without denigrating that potential at all, ultimately just another “trip”, just another step in our meta-evolution, the rapid metamorphosis we have been undergoing since our beginning. Within those extremes, there is the most significant latitude for the inevitable expansion into dimensions that will allow us to become far wiser, individually, through greater experience, greater learning, and the ability to witness the patterns of repetition within extended periodicity. Eliminating the pressure of a short lifespan that influences our choices and cramps our lives will not just give us the practical potential to travel easily between star systems and send the insurance companies into re-edit mode; it will change our perspective and our social interactions, and, indeed, the entirety of human existence, radically.
Beyond Religion and The Old New Age
Imagine, even no religion,
They say I’m a dreamer,
But I’m not the only one.
John Lennon
Over the last 2000 years, we have seen scientific or pseudoscientific doctrines espoused by various religions contradicted or demolished, and the religions have repeatedly, though with significant delay, changed their positions regarding our genesis, history, evolution, and science, modifying their doctrines. But the new paradigm addresses the very root doctrines, positions, claimed divine franchise and authority of all the religions of the world, and will eventually cause the obsolescence of all institutionalized religions springing from our ancient relationship of subservience to the Anunnaki.
Religion, as we know it, is the transmutation of the Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery, and then limited, subservient partnership, the godspell. The concept of God, capital G, has gradually developed through the cosmification of the various Anunnaki rulers, Enlil (Jehovah/YHWH), Enki (Adonai, the Lord), and Allah (El/Nannar/Sin), among others, and has been embellished with the heady concepts of metaphysical speculation. It has lately become a sort of faux ecumenical gloss: the TV news quotes the Koran as saying “There is no God but God” when it should be “There is no god but Allah, a completely different meaning. The god of the Judeo-Roman Christian tradition, Jehovah YHWH, was – quite possibly still is — the flesh and blood Anunnaki individual, Enlil, eventually cosmified into the absolute creator of the universe, ultimately spoken of as infinite love, infinite justice, infinite this or infinite that, through the bishops and the scholastic philosophers and theologians.
The Concept of “God”
The idea of a cosmic, infinite principle “God”, as many of us still take it for granted, is a thoroughly mixed composite concept of the sublimation of the anthropomorphic and imperfect Anunnaki individuals, the “deities” of slave code religions; metaphysical abstractions accumulated over time through the speculations of the revered philosophers from the Greeks onward; the Hellenic influenced, theo-philosophical teachings of the Roman Church scholastic tradition and mystics; flavored with the concepts of theists, deists, agnostics, theosophists and mystics of any number of sects; and thoroughly leavened by the concepts of the consciousness expanding disciplines and metaphysical doctrines of the East, sprinkled with our own individual intellectual and emotional subjective variations and usually still conditioned by the godspell element of subservience. But that cosmified, composite, intellectual abstraction is not the Jehovah/YHWH or Jesus of the Judeo-Christian religions, the Prime Mover of Thomas Aquinas, or the Omega point of De Chardin, the Allah of the Muslim faith, the Brahma of Hinduism, the Buddha, or the Tao or deity of the religion of your choice.
OVERVIEW
Many who do not realize this crucial distinction, do not want to, or are not ready to, take refuge in the Big-G little-g syndrome, a sort of halfway shelter on the way to genetic enlightenment. That position is articulated as, “I see the real historical nature of the ‘gods’, the little ’ g’s, but that does not shake my belief in a Big G. That way, they can still subscribe to the platitudes that the “God of all religions” is beyond individual doctrinal differences and contradictory theologies, “all paths lead to the same God,” and similar inane notions. The new paradigm allows us to sort all these elements out, identify the distinct individual real gods of various religions, place them and ourselves in historical perspective, and recognize the metaphysical conceptualizations of deity, East and West, as products of our own evolving racial psychology.
Yes, the new paradigm means that religion and religions, as we know them, will have to bow out. The godspell phenomenon has two parts: we need to overcome the slave mentality of dependence and subservience, and we need to discard the institutional religions that sprang from and dominated through it, especially the radical fundamentalism, West and East, that is ultimately tearing the race apart. The role of the theologian then becomes the facilitation of planetary reconciliation in the transition to the time beyond religion.
The institutional, slave-code, godspell religions have fixed dogmas which are directly contradicted by the new paradigm. They claim divine franchise by gods who are now radically redefined. They claim absolute authority over the disciplines that produce the information that would demonstrate their true historical nature. The ultimate driving force will most probably be a degree of desperation and desire for peace gradually manifesting in the entire planetary population so strong that it will cause an abandonment of the authoritarian leaders and dogmas of the religions, followed by a younger generation of clerics who will recognize the inevitable and introduce new interpretations and relaxed rules to gradually smooth the phase out and transition, hopefully to humanitarian organizations and peace movements. The signs of transition in some religious organizations toward a charitable and ecological focus may be seen as an almost inchoate beginning of this kind of transformation. It would also be foolish not to expect diehard fundamentalist backlash.
Is this atheism? No, paradoxically, not as such. Not as we have defined atheism previously as the denial of the existence of any kind of god, cosmic or otherwise. It is simply a long-overdue correction of some local, intra-solar-system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective. Garden-variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority of the obviously all-too-humanoid characteristics of whatever sublimated local Anunnaki “god” is still the object of worship (the original meaning of worship was “work for”: AVOD = work). Yes, the subservient godspell religious stage will be surpassed. The resultant freedom, however, will engender and foster greater curiosity about reality and a seeking for ultimate causes far more metaphysically adequate and commensurate with our expanding consciousness far beyond even the search for the Law of Everything. The element of transcendence associated with some religions will, at minimum, be understood as generic consciousness expanding into higher and higher dimensionality.
Neither is this materialistic reductionism, although it does force us to reconsider the notion of the “spiritual”. What is needed is a complete overhaul of all our metaphors and concepts of the “spiritual” because the great majority of them are embedded in our cultural fabric and consciousness as leftovers from Judeo-Roman Catholic theology and second-hand Eastern philosophies. The importance of this overhaul is critical because it involves the concepts of mind, consciousness, intelligence, will, self-awareness, transcendence, dimensionality, and self.
SAPIENS RISING: FROM SUMER TO COSMIC CITIZENSHIP
(9-Article Series)
- Why Sumer Still Terrifies the Establishment
- Neil Freer: Futant Philosopher of the 21st Century
- The Grail Bloodline: From Sumer to the Essenes
- The Anunnaki Hypothesis: Genetic Engineering and Human Origins
- Gods, Lords, and Controllers: How Religion Became a Slave Code
- Real evolution: From Bicameral Mind to Integrated Humanity
- Sapiens Rising: Neil Freer’s Manifesto for a Free Species
- Timothy Leary, Futants, and the Next Human
- From Slave Species to Cosmic Citizenship
Neil Freer (1943–2016)
Futurist, Philosopher, and Architect of “Sapiens Rising”
Neil Freer was an independent philosopher, futurist, and cultural critic whose work explored the intersection of human origins, consciousness evolution, and the future of civilization. Drawing upon the controversial but influential research of Zecharia Sitchin, Freer sought to synthesize ancient Sumerian texts, comparative religion, genetics, and emerging technologies into a coherent framework for understanding humanity’s past and possible future.
Freer is best known for his concept of “Sapiens Rising”, a term he used to describe humanity’s transition from a fragmented, domination-based species toward an integrated, conscious, and self-determining civilization. He argued that myths and religious narratives preserved distorted memories of real encounters between early humans and advanced non-human intelligences—identified in ancient texts as the Anunnaki or Nephilim.
Central to Freer’s work was the claim that modern humanity carries a dual inheritance: a terrestrial lineage rooted in Homo erectus and an enhanced genetic component introduced by technologically advanced visitors. He believed this hybrid origin explained both humanity’s creative brilliance and its recurring self-destructive tendencies.
Freer was also deeply concerned with the role of organized religion and institutional authority in suppressing alternative models of human origins. He viewed fear-based religious systems as cultural remnants of ancient master–slave relationships, perpetuated to maintain social control rather than spiritual growth. In their place, he advocated a post-religious spirituality grounded in personal responsibility, ecological stewardship, and species-level maturity.
Influenced by futurist and psychologist Timothy Leary, Freer embraced the idea of the “futant”—a human capable of consciously participating in their own evolution. He believed that advances in genetics, neuroscience, and space technology made it possible for humanity to transcend inherited limitations and assume ethical responsibility as a planetary and eventually interplanetary species.
Neil Freer passed away on March 25, 2016, in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Though his work remains outside mainstream academia, his ideas continue to circulate among independent researchers, experiencers, and revisionist scholars seeking to reconcile ancient history, modern science, and humanity’s future among the stars.
Beyond The Babel Factor: Human Over-Unity
The new paradigm is the basis, perhaps the only adequate basis, for a profound unification of all humanity. Not some superficial token ecumenicism or social homogenization of peoples and cultures and philosophies, but a unification that frees us to be one species and explains and enhances our diversity of adaptations, cultures, and contributions. The cumulative evidence and restored history have enabled us to grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. All the political, economic, social, scientific, new age, evolutionary variables are only symptomatic; the genetic level is where the profound realization must blossom. The restoration of our generic history and a generic definition of what a human is affords us the advancement that will take the planet off hold.
The Current Grand Moment
This is the endgame of an age, be certain. A new human and a new civilization beyond religion and the old new age are on the horizon. I submit that the most fundamental, profound, overarching, sociological transformation we are going through at this point in our history is the change from the theo-politically controlled and manipulated explanations of our beginnings and history to species independence. We are witnessing the last gasp of religious fundamentalism worldwide. Whether we choose to acknowledge it or not, we are already well into one of “…. those Grand Moments when the whole scale of being is reevaluated” as John Petersen has characterized it. It is within these redefinitions that the resolutions to the problems and obstacles deeply embedded in our species’ and individual psyches are to be found. To paraphrase Dylan Thomas rather crudely, let us not go blind into that daylight. But how do we accomplish the transition from our current planetary standstill to planetary consensus gracefully and quickly? It’s best to recognize from the outset that the revolution required is the meta-wild card, so radical in its implications and ramifications and requirements, that there is no single discipline, no institution, indeed no individual or group who can bring it about alone. It is so planetarily encompassing that stepping outside of this box is almost impossible. The change will have to come from within.
Science, the closest we have come to a common ground, a common criterion, has played and will continue to play a pivotal role in the recognition and acceptance of the new worldview.
Astronomy will demonstrate the existence of the tenth planet unequivocally — the IRAS, Infrared Imaging Satellite, quite obviously discovered it in ‘83-’84 — and, reluctantly, recognize the correspondence of the details gradually accumulated with the ancient data we now possess. The curiosity about the existence of the Anunnaki on Nibiru/Planet X will become overwhelming, and contact through spacecraft and signaling will commence.
Archaeology, over the last 150 years, has made significant contributions to the body of data and will continue to do so. Only recently has the science of genetics been able to refine, sometimes correct, archaeological and anthropological estimates and dating. Because of the intertwining of archaeological and genetic information concerning our unique genesis, genetics has already been, and should continue to be, a significant tool and contributing science to the new paradigm.
The more robust the scientific information becomes, the easier it will be for the religions of the world to accept and incorporate. Nations and cultures will also see the cogency of the information and gradually accept it, becoming more planetary in outlook.
In the name of world unity and peace, governments and contributing entities should increase funding of the scientific searches and research in these disciplines and adopt policies that will release the information, some of it, indeed, withheld at this time, already possessed.
Gardner’s Contribution: Western Culture Revisited
A significant contribution to resolving the conflicts between the religions of Western culture in this regard is the work of Sir Laurence Gardner. Sitchin’s work and the significant discoveries of the Dead Sea Scrolls have enabled Gardner, an English genealogist—historian, to make a recent breakthrough. Gardner has the advantage of 150 years of discovery and translation of Sumerian source material, knowledge of Anunnaki politics and the interaction between Enki and Enlil, and the latest scholarship on the Dead Sea Scrolls and Nag Hammadi documents, through the brilliant work of the Australian theologian Barbara Thiering. Working as a genealogist with data available through privileged access to the private archives of 30 European royal family clients, Gardner has brought to light a robust, well-documented genealogical and genetic history of a special bloodline that traces back to the Anunnaki and Sumeria. This information, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer fearful of the boiling oil of the Inquisition, has always been available. He has identified the Holy Grail as this bloodline of humans, enhanced by Enki with additional Anunnaki genes, intended to be human leader-rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people” traceable all the way back to Sumer. The modern word Grail traces back to graal, san graal, which, etymologically, stems from the Sumerian root words GRA AL, meaning special bloodline. The bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki genes, was initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs (anointed ones), and fostered by the Essene communities, as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jesus was an Essene in the bloodline, as was Mary Magdalene. They were a man and a wife and had children. Jesus was of a liberal persuasion within that tradition.
This strain of Hellenistic, liberal Judaism eventually became known as heterodox Christianity (the word Christian was not coined until almost four hundred years later), and was opposed by the Pauline branch, which eventually allied itself with Rome and became the Roman Church. The orthodox Roman Church perpetuated the slave-code fear and subservience tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted, and brutalized the human-centered strain of the bloodline. The reason why women have constantly been denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on transmission through the women of the line, and any recognition of them would be recognition of the line. This further elucidates our genetic background. It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this vital block of information about the genome because of the preclusive attitude of the “bishops” who still reign in archaeology. We are the product of that Nefilim technology, a mutant species with bicameral genetics, a bicameral mind. We can finally integrate both halves of our nature. Our Homo Erectus component will bring us back to harmony with this planet, making it a nice place to live and a nice place to visit. Our Anunnaki component will teach us how to move off planet gracefully. The word from station DNA is these “gods” wear designer genes.
The New Human
We need to think about what it is like to be a member of a synthesized species undergoing a special case of evolution. In this rapid metamorphosis, we can actually determine our own evolutionary direction when the ramifications of that unthinkable thought are now about to bring about a turning point in our history. It is about the new civilization we are about to create out of the new planetary vision.
Let us postulate that we have broken the godspell, we have arrived at a consensual, planetary, understanding and definition of the generic human as a genetically engineered species now coming out of racial adolescence into species first maturity, the individual cognizant of the ability to control and direct the nature and trajectory of his and her own personal evolution and able and expected to contribute to the collective consciousness and determination of the racial evolutionary trajectory.
The awareness and comprehension of this fundamental, generic racial self-knowledge, which I have called genetic enlightenment. By “genetic enlightenment,” I mean what it is like once you have broken the godspell, the deepest dye in the fabrics of both Eastern and Western culture. Many seemingly enigmatic items are resolved, and there is a great deal to be done. It becomes immediately apparent that we can move beyond both eastern and western metaphors; beyond religion, atheism, the old-new age; beyond Jungian archetypal and mythological interpretation; beyond our strange, dangerous, and contradictory mix of mammalian, turfish, violent theo-political politics and compassionate ideals. We will finally be ready for alien contact, interaction, and matriculation into stellar society. We can reach a planetary unity we have never known before, and a peace so profound it will be almost humorous. How long will it take? Probably as long as we have lived under our Constitution.
The Trajectory of Realevolution
A cardinal result of our confusion about who and what we are causes us to be at a loss as to what the thrust and direction, the trajectory of that evolutionary dynamic, might be. When we collectively recognize the validity of the new paradigm and restore our true history to ourselves, we will gain a critical advantage: we will be positioned to understand not only our unique synthetic nature but also our unique evolutionary trajectory. This will mark a cardinal turning point in our history.
Once the locked-in, slave-code legacies and the conflicts they engender, both species wise and in the individual, are seen for what they really are, it becomes clear that the thrust, the direction, of our Realevolution is toward greater and greater expansion of freedom, compassion, understanding, cooperation, intelligence, consciousness, dimensional perception, conscious personal and species orchestration and control. It raises and enhances the individual’s level of importance, the scope of the individual’s choices, and enlarges the arena of exploration. It points towards immortality and beyond, to transformations of our nature hardly imaginable now. The message is that liberated human nature and existence are open-ended, forward, creative, poetic, rhapsodic, expanding, exciting, and enticing.
The Demographics of Our Real Evolution
The evolutionary demographic profile of the species at any given time tends to be bell-shaped. The segments of the bell curve represent gene pools with different foci and functions. Perhaps two percent of the population, at any given time, will be located at the very leading edge of the curve. These are the futants, those who are genetically programmed to be the evolutionary scouts of future dimensions, scenarios, and potentials. Rather than kill them, jail them, shun them, we had better learn to recognize their function, sort out the valuable parts of their reports of the future, and honor their contribution to the evolutionary progress of our species.
IQ Meets CQ….and EQ?
Genetic enlightenment will afford derivative significant advantages in psychology, sociology, and education.
Once we recognize the nature and direction of our real evolution, we will be positioned to understand the details of its mechanism. The current agenda of the DNA intelligence is to produce neurological systems that can use themselves as an instrument and bodies sophisticated enough to house them. There are several survival functions necessary to protect, preserve, and further that goal and the species. Specific gene pools of individuals accomplish these functions. Individual, personal real evolution recapitulates the real evolution of our species, and this involves the individual moving through different gene pools at various ages and stages. Education is most effectively accomplished in gene pool contexts when the child, adolescent, or adult is evolving through or specializing in a particular gene pool.
IQ, intelligent quotient, is defined in revolutionary terms as an estimate of an entity’s proficiency in receiving, processing, and transmitting information from external and internal sources, testable and measurable against a relative peer scale.
Just as one can test to determine if an entity possesses some degree of intelligence, so one can test to determine if an entity has some degree of consciousness. Just as with intelligence, once determined in an entity, one can devise relative criteria and scales to measure the extent of the spectrum of awarenesses and the degree and focus of each kind of awareness, its integration, and the entity’s conscious use of its input and data. Let us call this the consciousness quotient: CQ.
How primitive are we still? Tests for a consciousness quotient, CQ, do not seem to be a concept our collective consciousness is comfortable with just yet. Not just a test to determine a verifiable state of awareness. Not just a test to see if we can be Turinged by some program or entity. A test of consciousness quotient would determine the entire range of awarenesses of the entity, human or otherwise, and the degree of development and intensity, quality, and focus of each part of that spectrum.
The democratic ideal is twisted about consciousness, as it is with IQ. Yes, all humans are created equal in terms of their human rights, but we don’t all have the same abilities or degrees of ability, intelligence, or consciousness. Somehow, such recognition is seen by some as less than politically correct or as a denigration of specific individuals.
How primitive are we? If the notion of a CQ is touchy, try EQ, an individual’s evolutionary quotient, a relative scale measuring an individual’s evolutionary development and potential. We continually make ad hoc judgments, many times for the sake of our own security and safety, about the relatively evolved or devolved physical, mental, and consciousness characteristics and signals of others, just as we are doing continually about their manifest IQ. A parent, teacher, or psychologist expects a statement like “This person has a higher IQ than that person” to be sophisticated and socially acceptable. If, however, one dares broach the notion of a consciousness quotient, CQ, communicatory flags go up; there is disconcertion, confusion, and even conflict. Advance the concept of an EQ, an evolutionary developmental quotient, and things get really squirrelly. Once we are adjusted to the idea of the individual, from conception on, recapitulating the stages of species evolution, we will begin to take the notions of CQ and EQ as given. We will need them to recognize the developmental stage of a child or adult to determine in which gene pool context he or she should be educated in or contribute to at that point, thereby most effectively promoting and accelerating his or her personal real evolution.
The recognition that the stages of real evolution are stages of conscious evolution will facilitate the resolution of the perennial academic problem involving states of consciousness other than “normal”. At this primitive stage, we cannot even agree on what constitutes the real or “legitimate” elements of the spectrum of human consciousness. If an investigator’s paradigm — or consciousness — does not happen to have the capacity for some perception, sensitivity, or ability, its reality is often denied, a priori, in other humans. It may not even be admitted for testing, or the investigation could turn into an inquisition, with magicians as inquisitors instead of Dominican monks, in the public square of some “learning” channel. We argue about the reality of various kinds of extrasensory perception, non-local communication, transcendental states, and perceivable dimensionalities, and we never seem to be able to reach definitive conclusions — unless, of course, the Pentagon needs remote viewers. Consciousness in, consciousness out. Once we have understood real evolution as essentially a process of consciousness development, the paranormal modalities will be recognized as advanced, evolved functions along the real evolutionary trajectory.
Timothy Leary, Ph.D., the Tesla of psychology, developed an elegant schema to identify the types of consciousness at each stage of real evolution, past, present, and coming. I have included a summary of it as Appendix B. It is a road-and-flight map of real evolution. Note well the simple but profound advice: “The answer to all human problems is to recognize your genetic stage, go to the place where your genetic peers hang out, and in that secure place prepare yourself for the future stages inevitably awaiting you.”
We need institutions and governments that are built intrinsically on and for those characteristics, to support and further the evolution of the species and the individual as a primary function. The structure of constitutions and laws should promote the maximum freedom of expansion and exploration for the individual and the species.
Well, you say, here in the U. S., the Constitution is an advanced and enlightened document, which has solved many of those problems, at least in this country. I submit that the Constitution, certainly advanced and relatively enlightened when it was conceived and put in place, was an ingenious solution, created by deists, for maintaining some semblance of peace between the Colonial religious factions, restraining the religious mayhem always under the surface. However, there is no indication of any anticipation that there would ever be a resolution of those differences, no anticipation of a standard definition and understanding of human nature. The Constitution, as unique and effective as it is as a set of rules of order in a primitive situation, has become a locked-in legacy. It barely continues to balance the powers, long term, and prevent the takeover of the government and imposition of theocracy or fascism.
The extraordinary element remaining is the seed of evolutionary suggestion clearly intended by its authors, as expressed by Jefferson when he said:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as discoveries are made, new truths discovered, and manners and opinions change. With changing circumstances, institutions must also advance to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
A planetarily consensual conception of the generically human will enable us to derive improved forms of constitution and to develop systems of representation of individual input and voting that are far more adequate and accurate than our current systems of representation by strangers. That would be a first step. They will render our current systems outmoded that are modeled, to one degree or another, on the residue of slave-code religious rules. They will be determined democratically by direct input from the entire population and constructed to further and abet the real evolution of the individual and the species. We, in the U.S., need a second Constitution. To that purpose, I have included a proposal in Appendix C. The essence of the proposal is that we now have a tool, through the relatively incredible power of the electronic medium, in the “open source” approach to programming and system development that will afford us a means to move beyond outmoded representative government by the mediocracy to far more intelligent forms by direct input by each citizen.
The current severe crisis of world peace is mainly due to the “my god is better than your god” conflicts, the sad playing out of the same kind of wars in which we were used as pawns by the Anunnaki. The second major factor is economic: competition for limited resources, which is further exacerbated by the corruption of the powerful oppressing the weak. How primitive are we? We need only examine every economic system attempted or implemented to comprehend that, to this point, all forms have been successful only to a limited extent in specific circumstances. Every serious economic and political structuring has proven to have benefits but equally severe limitations and drawbacks due to conflicts over what and who a human individual is and, therefore, what the rights of the individual are relative to other humans and the state; what is considered moral, just; whether there should be winners and losers; who should be taken care of and why; and, to put it in modern academic jargon, who is the “other”. Indeed, the potential for human degeneracy is always extant and partly at cause, but the more fundamental Babel-factoring of our species still hinders us from taking conscious part in our real evolution, which is on schedule regardless. The new paradigm will, eventually, see our political and economic systems as mirroring our rapid, though confused, revolutionary stages and consciously, intelligently, and compassionately developing evolving, dynamic systems commensurate with our now and future trajectory. Artificial intelligence will probably have to be used to rapidly adjust economic systems for the benefit of all.
It’s All Over For The Current Consensual Worldview
Actually, it has been “all over” for some time now. Several works by various authors may be noted as turning-point markers just before the introduction of Sitchin’s thesis.
Joseph Campbell’s master work, The Masks of God, surveyed and elucidated the entire field of mythology. He accepted the fundamental premise that the “gods” were mythological. However, he was compelled to question the basic working premise of mythology that mythology had arisen through the naive proto-“science” of early human minds that attributed human characteristics to the sun, moon, stars, and the phenomena of nature: storms, lightning, winds, etc. He found very signicant the fact that the genealogies of the “gods” were the same in India as they were in the Norse countries —- the names were different because of the difference in languages, but the genealogical relationships were identical —- and had to conclude that something had begun in the “little Sumerian mud garden” and spread to the rest of the world. This was totally contradictory of the working premise of then and current mythology but he let it go at noting its significance. This was a demarcation for the introduction of Sitchin’s radical paradigm.
In 1976, Julian Jaynes of Princeton published The Origin of Consciousness. In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, an erudite study that examined the evolution of human consciousness, covering the classics, mythology, archaeology, religion, and history. He accepted the unquestioned premise that the “gods” were mythological, as did Campbell. He concludes that, because previous to 1250 B.C. humans claimed to talk to the gods, get instructions from them, hear them speak, work for them, all men before that turning point in time must have been hallucinating schizophrenes because, the gods being unreal, mythic, they must have been hearing them in their heads (!!). In retrospect, Jaynes’ work can be seen as the last-ditch effort to make a professional, academic sense of the puzzling history in which the only two choices were that the gods were imaginary, mythic, or real. It took Sitchin to provide the definitive validity of the “real” choice.
Sitchin was also first published in 1976 and has produced some nine volumes since.
In 1996, Samuel P. Huntington published The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Mr. Huntington presents a paradigm of global politics in terms of the interactions between civilizations, a “civilizational” approach, with the intention of providing insight into how to avoid the clashes between civilizations, which he sees as the greatest threat to world peace and, conversely, how “an international order based on civilizations is the surest safeguard against world war”.
The concept of a new world order, in itself, can be an idealistic and benevolent goal, although the perverted notion of such put forth by some devolved politicians has set back constructive progress in that direction considerably. The League of Nations and, currently, the United Nations are certainly steps in the right direction. The imposition of world domination by economic, political, military, or theocratic coercion is a retrograde and primitive attempt doomed to well-deserved failure. The conflicts and wars covering the planet are, in their transparently theo-political base, robot-like attempts to run the Revolutionary videotape in reverse and mark the beginning of a final, very slow denouement of that godspell phenomenon.
To bring it down to the here and now: if America, or any country or culture, is going to be an example for the rest of the world, there is no other choice but for it to set a real evolutionary example and style. It will require thinkers and scholars and innovators and futants from every discipline in every culture and country and religion to assimilate the vast amount of history, information, ooparts, traditions,s and technology which have been rediscovered and recovered over the last one hundred and fifty years from all parts of the world and to transform their religions and cultures accordingly. How long will it take? The view from 2100 (A.D.) sees it as having only begun in the 21st century and not totally completed by 2200.
Consciousness In, Consciousness Out
The new paradigm, elucidating our unique genesis and subsequent unique evolution (at least on this planet: it may happen similarly with synthesized species elsewhere) as, in a very real sense, an artificial intelligence, frees us to conceive the fundamental questions we need to ask ourselves and the answers not only our science but the entire racial pool of experience and knowledge needs to provide about AI. One of the most important contributions our restored history provides relates directly to the novel wild card concept of self-aware artificial consciousness in that it furnishes a wealth of information on the sociobiology of the creation of a synthetic species and the resulting, evolving social relationship between the creators and the created, between the Anunnaki and us.
Specifically, regarding whether Artificial Intelligence can be achieved and how we should go about it, our history is a strong source of a positive answer. Even while here, according to the recovered records of their deeds and interactions, the Anunnaki, besides genetically inventing humans, quite clearly had developed robots and androids, some of the latter so sophisticated that, it is written, it was difficult to tell one from a human or an Anunnaki. We can profit from the Anunnaki’s experience in creating a new species, in developing and using robots and sophisticated androids, and in the awesome invention of a species such as ours.
The realization of our half-alien genetic makeup and our relationship to the Anunnaki stretches our perspective, offering an effective way for us to begin to grasp the topic of alien presence on this planet. It also enables a previously unattainable, unassailable integrity, individually and as a race, which will be essential for entering into direct contact with alien species, either in the future or with those already here on the planet. We shall finally enter stellar society as a mature race which knows who and what it is, what is suitable for it and what is not; with whom or what it could interact, with whom and what it would be dangerous to make contact; with the minimum of preconceptions as to how things should be. Until we know who and what we are we will probably not be allowed into stellar society. Until we break the godspell and stop looking up for Daddy to come back, looking for some solution or salvation from outside, we will be in danger of getting Borged by whoever shows up here. The topic of alien contact is probably the most dramatic of examples of how narrow and primitive our focus is. It is a fact and the gradual insinuation of it into our collective consciousness has progressed in the last fifty years.
A Retrospective View From 2100
The elements that characterize the new civilization are a collective, consensual awareness of our generic humanity as a planetary unity, a recognition of a common, known history from the beginning of the race as a genetically engineered species, a globally common conception of human nature and its evolutionary direction, a multi–dimensional sociobiology capable of reflexive self-analysis, a psychology devoted to fostering the positive evolutionary development of the individual over the entire spectrum of consciousness, a unified scientific field expressed through a profound natural language based on self-referential consciousness, an ecological, non-competitive, ubiquitously helpful economics, an integral systems approach to the management of the material realm, with the primary focus on the transcendental as the essential human process.
With the demise of Godspell religions and the dawning of a generic, planetary definition of human nature, the social context and educational process will undergo a profound revolution. The orientation will not be to a creationist or a Darwinian evolutionary context, but to a generic, planetarily everyday real evolutionary context. We will finally be free to understand our common species predecessors and our bicameral species heritage in perspective. That perspective will afford us the detailed information concerning the stages of developmental real evolution we have passed through to this point. We will be able to understand and utilize the real evolutionary map of those stages as laid out by Leary in the first-of-its-kind schema, and even better ones to follow.
The awareness of the historical stages and trajectory of real evolution will make us conscious of the agenda of DNA, of our genetic coding: survival and ever-increasing conscious control over our own existence. We might say that we are totally determined to determine our own determination. Gene pools (groups throughout the population that are predominantly programmed for specific functions for survival of the species) will be recognized for what they are and valued. Once we are conscious of the nature and purpose of these specialized populations and how they map onto the stages of real evolution, we will see that we may move from one gene pool to another, absorbing the ancient wisdom of each for survival, personal learning, and expansion. Moving from one gene pool to another will be a natural part of an individual’s unique personal evolutionary process. There will be mutual respect and positive recognition among gene pools beyond mere tolerance, and the only rule necessary will be a consensually agreed prohibition on any gene pool doing anything that harms or obstructs the function of another. The gene pool golden rule. It also brings us full circle around to the children, us in the future. I project a realistic evolutionary scenario for the treatment and education of the children of the 21st century, as follows.
A further refinement of the gene pool concept will be its incorporation into the educational process: the stages of the human child’s recapitulatory developmental process will be mapped onto the various gene pools, without assigning hierarchical rankings to them. A child will have the opportunity to experience the best features of the multiple phases of human evolutionary experimentation. The quintessence of the hunter, gatherer, and agricultural cultures presented by those steeped in and expert in the context will put the student in tune with deep genetic roots, survival methods, cooperation, and creativity. The crafts, industrial, mechanical, engineering, construction, and building gene pools; the arts, literary, and musical pools; the military, police, and civil servant gene pools all offer some essence of their orientation to reality as insight into a facet of human nature and ingenuity. The domestic, child-bearing and rearing, cooperative, social, political, and educational pools will certainly all contribute to the recapitulatory phases of a child’s development, each at its proper time.
The children will be encouraged to be their own philosophers from the earliest age, according to their capacity at each stage. They will be encouraged to make their own decisions about reality, to explore and follow their unique evolutionary development, and to respectfully make their exceptional contribution to the ongoing conversation about the ideal trajectory of our collective species’ evolution. Language, reason, and logic will be understood as products of certain stages of our revolutionary perception of three-dimensional reality. They will be taught the nature of reality in the most comprehensive scientific and philosophical context we know, and introduced to the concept of action, which enhances others while enhancing us. They will be enabled to continue the process of personal real evolution on their own. In peace.
What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell, the looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy-to-return, master-slave attitude, the deepest dye in the fabrics of all cultures? In the immediate future, the god games we shall play as our own evolutionary artists are immortality, self-directed, conscious evolution, four-dimensional consciousness, life under a law of everything, practical transcendence, the development of AI as a subordinate species, and surrogate operations. For starters. Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim and withheld from humans, will be transformed from a “religious” afterlife reward to the dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our racial maturation. We will be our own “gods”, our own genetic credentials, play our own god games with an unassailable species identity, enabling us to step confidently into stellar society.
But what of us individually? Once the ancient, subservient godspell is dispelled, we are freed, individually, to go one-on-one with the universe. We will operate as our own “gods”, according to our own genetic credentials, play our own god games according to our own transcendental choices, creating our own confident realities. We will perfect systematic self-supersedence as a conscious evolution art form.
The characteristics that mark the new human are an unassailable personal integrity, relativistic epistemology, profound compassion, robust depth of informational data, understanding of the universe in terms of a whole unified field, broad-spectrum competence, transcendental competition, facility in dimensional shifting, preference for dyadic operation, a profound ability to enjoy, to play the games most enjoyable and satisfying to generic “gods”, an expanded capacity to literally have great fun creating new realities, with the primary focus on the multi-dimensional. And to play those “god” games in the context of relative immortality and, eventually, habitual four-dimensional consciousness.
We have the cumulative data and information at hand to initiate the planetary unification process. Let us make it so for the children.
Synopsis of the Sitchin Paradigm
Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for two hundred years, Sitchin propounds – proves, in the opinion of this author –that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: “those who came down from the heavens”; Old testament Hebrew, Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years ago, colonized the planet, to obtain large quantities of gold. Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions in the mines, and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist, and Ninhursag, their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory results from splicing animal and Homo erectus genes, merged their Anunnaki genes with those of Homo erectus to produce us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species for their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid, we could not procreate. The demand for us as workers became greater and we were genetically manipulated to reproduce.
Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet. Having become a stable genetic stock and developing more precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This was unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council, and it was decided to wipe out the human population through a flood that was predictable when Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet, came through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its periodic 3600-year returns. Some humans were saved by the action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to the humans he had initially genetically created. For thousands of years, we were their slaves, their workers, their servants, and their soldiers in their political battles among themselves. The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their palaces (we retroproject the religious notion of temple on these now), their cities, their mining and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on all the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found in the farthest reaches of the planet.
Around 6000 years ago, they, probably realizing that they were going to phase out of existence, began, gradually, to bring humans to independence. Sumer, a human civilization, was excellent in its “sudden”, mature, and highly advanced character, and was established under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of human populations answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of the people,” was initiated (Gardner). These designated humans were taught technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts, and the ways of advanced civilized society (in schools now called “mystery schools,” but there was no mystery about them). Gardner has brought to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented, genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer gun-shy of the Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one branded “heretical” and murderously persecuted by the Roman Church. There were no Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep in the dark about the fundamental nature of human history and destroy the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops.
What evidence supports the Sitchin thesis?
Astronomical Evidence
“…no concrete problem is going to be solved as long as the experts of astronomy are too supercilious to touch “mythical” ideas — which are firmly believed to be plain nonsense, of course — as long as historians of religion swear to it that stars and planets were smuggled into originally “healthy” fertility cults and naive fairy tales only “very late” — whence these unhealthy subjects should be neglected by principle — and as long as the philologists imagine that familiarity with grammar replaces that scientific knowledge which they lack, and dislike.” Giorgio de Santillana, Ph.D. & Hertha von Dechend, Ph.D. Hamlet’s Mill
A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence, now or in the past, of the tenth planet in our solar system, the home planet of the Anunnaki, with the size, orbit, and characteristics described, as Sitchin has demonstrated, in the Enuma Elish and corroborated by Harrington, former chief of the U.S. Naval Observatory, now deceased.
Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto’s moon, in 1978. The characteristics of Pluto derivable from the nature of Charon demonstrated that there must still be a large planet undiscovered because Pluto could not be the cause of the residuals, the “wobbles” in the orbital paths of Uranus and Neptune, which are clearly identifiable. The IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during ’83 -’84, produced observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the astronomers on the project said that “all that remains is to name it” — from which point the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992, Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with all the information they had at hand, published their findings and opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an “intruder” planet. The search was narrowed to the southern skies, below the ecliptic. Harrington invited Sitchin, having read his book and translations of the Enuma Elish, to a meeting at his office and they correlated the current findings with the ancient records.
The recovered the Enuma Elish, the primary transcultural document from Sumer to forming the basis for Genesis, a history of the formation of our solar system and more, says that, at the time when Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus and Saturn were in place, there was a Uranus sized planet, called Tiamat, in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A large wandering planet called Nibiru was captured into the system by gravitational interactions. As it passed by the outer planets, it caused anomalies in their moons, the tilting of Uranus on its side, and the dislodging of Pluto from its status as a moon of Saturn to its own planetary orbit. Its path bent by the gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites collided with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit through, Nibiru collided with Tiamat, driving the larger part of it into what is now Earth’s orbit to recongeal as Earth, dragging its moon with it to become our Moon with all its anomalies. The shattered debris of Tiamat’s smaller part became the asteroid belt, comets, and meteorites. The gouge of our Pacific basin is a remarkable testimony to the collisional event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year elliptical retrograde (opposite direction to all the other planets) orbit around our sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region between Mars and Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past Pluto at apogee. Harrington acknowledged that his information agreed with all these details and the maps they each had drawn of the orbits were almost indistinguishable. The current probable location of Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was the same.
For the meeting between Harrington and Sitchin at the Naval Observatory, click here for the video interview. Use your BACK button to return to this place.
It is the opinion of this author and others that, in light of the evidence already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10 and 11 and two Voyager space craft, the Infrared Imaging Satellite (IRAS, ‘83-84) and the clear and unequivocal statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin, that the search has already been accomplished, in fact that the planet has already been found — and has been tracked, studied, it’s orbit determined and it’s time of return to the inner solar system calculated. Astronomers are strangely silent and reticent to talk.
We need to force the issue of the tenth planet being in our solar system, not just to demonstrate the validity of the new paradigm but for a very practical reason. The ancient records are very clear. The passage of the tenth planet, Nibiru, once every 3600 years, through the inner solar system affects the Earth, sometimes in catastrophic ways. It is very probably the cause of pole shifts, pole reversals, changes in the precessional movement, perhaps even catastrophic bombardment by asteroid-sized space debris that it may drag along with it. Since it passes through the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter and its orbital path may vary depending on the positions of the other planets when it comes through, it may have been responsible for the devastation of Mars. A rigorous, detailed computer modeling of the solar system, including the tenth planet, needs to be done urgently for our own planetary safety. Remember that the Vatican maintains an astronomical observatory and Msgr. Balducci may have access to information that prompts him to make the amazing statements he has, no doubt as the voice of the Vatican.
Technological Evidence
Ooparts is the term used to describe artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions, and documents that are purportedly out of place in time and have come to light through archaeological excavation or discovery. Almost everyone is familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of stone requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000 ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc. The most recent and quite impressive oopart is the rediscovery of monoatomic gold by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated by the advanced physics community) Hudson’s discovery, correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago. These ooparts, coupled with evidence from many disciplines and historical records, indicate that an advanced civilization existed at the time, possessed high technology, and was indeed the Anunnaki.
Documentary Evidence
The historical documentation of the existence and deeds of the Anunnaki has only gradually become available to us since the early 1800’s. The excavation of the ancient sites of Mesopotamia brought to light the amazingly advanced civilization of Sumer and, with it, thousands of clay tablets containing not only mundane records of commerce, marriages, military actions, and advanced astronomical calculation systems but also the history of the Anunnaki themselves. It is clear from those records that the Sumerians knew these aliens to be real flesh-and-blood. The library of the ruler, Ashurbanipal, at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down, and the clay tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our reading. One of the most impressive recent finds has been a sealed, nine-foot by six-foot room in Sippar holding, neatly arranged on shelves, a set of some 400 elaborate clay tablets containing an unbroken record of the history of those ancient times, a sort of time capsule. The evidence is so overwhelming and robust that, if it weren’t for those with the power to suppress it, it would have been accepted and our worldview changed a century ago, or perhaps sooner.
Genetic Evidence
The recovered records place the Anunnaki laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in east-central Africa, just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the first woman Homo sapiens, and in the same period. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000-year-old gold mines in that area.) The evidence for and description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to going to Mars in only 250,000 years does not correspond to the million-year periodicities of the slow evolutionary development of other species, such as Homo erectus, before us. As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as discussed in part three.
Scientific Objections to the Thesis
How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in earth gravity and atmosphere, very similar to current humans in all ways, have evolved on a planet within our solar system whose orbital apogee takes it into the deep cold of space for much of its orbit?
The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a “radiant” planet. This may be understood as having a high core temperature. Although controversial, there is also an astrophysical view that a large body in an elongated orbit is constantly tending toward a circular orbit, which can generate stresses that could produce substantial heat. That their planet is gradually cooling may be indicated by Sitchin’s interpretation of their colonizing Earth (which contains most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) to obtain large quantities of gold for molecular seeding of their atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding. Pertinent here is Harrington’s confident statement to Sitchin that it is “a lovely, good planet, could be surrounded by gases, probably has an atmosphere, and could support life like ours. The sunlight level there might be quite different from that on Earth. The Anunnaki were often depicted or sculpted with what seem to be sunglasses.
If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different planet from Earth under quite different conditions to which to adapt, why should they have turned out to be so identical to the human species? Sitchin’s answer is based on the collision between the intruder planet Nibiru and the planet Tiamat, from which the Earth’s core formed after being driven into its current orbit. If two or at least one of the colliding planets was sufficiently developed to have evolved basic organic compounds, perhaps even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from amino acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive organisms could account for the evolutionary similarity. Although this author finds it a reasonable, if even trivial, hypothesis that advanced civilizations would be capable of crossing significantly different genomes, perhaps with even radically different bases, the cross-seeding theory can account for the apparent relative ease with which the Anunnaki impinged their genes on those of Homo erectus. The Anunnaki’s skill level 200,000 years ago is indicated well by the recorded fact that, in early trials, they succeeded in crossing animal genes with Homo erectus genes, obtained living hybrids, but never a satisfactory product, which led them to modify Homo erectus genes with their advanced genes.
If our genome is estimated to be 98% to 99% similar to the chimpanzee’s, how could there be a melding of the Homo erectus and Anunnaki genomes, or an impingement of the advanced code on the less advanced one, detectable? The author suggests that this is a central question, probably answerable only by geneticists open-minded enough to tackle it. The resolution of that question should provide rich additional clues in itself.
OVERVIEW
The logo says it all. The image on the left is of a clay tablet, recovered from the Middle East, depicting the celebration of the successful genetic engineering of our species by the alien (the transcultural “gods” known to all ancient civilizations), Anunnaki scientists, Enki and Ninhursag, 200,000 years ago. (Yes, you read it correctly: keep an open mind, you’ll need it on this site.)
The image on the right is the one placed on the Pioneer 10 spacecraft to inform alien species of our existence. We, Sapiens, have been rising, are rising, evolving in a unique, post-Darwinian modality, rapidly, precociously, from square one as a slave species a brief 200,000 years ago to going to the stars, shortly, as our own “gods”, our own half-alien evolutionary artists. We will talk here about stepping out of racial adolescence, restoring our real history and what the ramifications are for the present and the future beyond the slave-code religions, the sublimation of our ancient master-slave relationship to the Anunnaki. The totems and taboos of our racial adolescence dispelled, Prometheus can get off his rock and reach genetic satori; Job can get off his dung heap and complete his EST training; Buddha can open his eyes and reach genetic enlightenment; Jesus the man can disavow sectarian politics and run again for genetic office.
If I am right, if, you will find here a literal rethinking of this planet; a comprehensive, robust, and startling new worldview of who and what we are; the ramifications of the restoration of our true history as a genetically engineered species; a resolution of the creationist-evolutionist conflict; a clear view of the forward trajectory of our species’ real evolution. In short, the focus of this site is on a new view of planetary reality at a fundamental level far more profound than the usual political, religious, historical, and intellectual concepts in which we think—and conflict.
You will find here a vision of the generic human beyond religion, Darwin’s quaint view of evolution, the recycled explanations and failed solutions of millennia past, and the old new age. You will find hope, positive direction, progress, talk of immortality, the new human, and a view from 2100 A.D. of where our species’ realevolution could, should, will take us within the next 100 years. You will find yourself, here, Sapiens, rising, perhaps a bit dazed, now coming out of species adolescence, eager and ready for alien society. The most significant focus is the Universe. The immediate focus is on the children: we must not lose one more generation of our best to our primitive follies.
The more I know, the more I know I don’t know. At any given time you access this site, it will be the best I can conceive, the best I can offer, with respect, and for your judgment. It is a work in progress and, intentionally, will improve continually: please visit from time to time. The information offered here is worthless unless utilized.
The life force coming back up from its winter pause in the Earth here in the high desert is tangible, timeless, unconcerned, and amused. The golden heat from our reliable local solar furnace feels even better on my shoulders than when I was a kid roaming the summer stream banks back East. When I look around, however, from a futant perspective, the entire population of the planet looks as if it’s in a mild agony, most intense in the bodies and minds of the young being sacrificed by the elders in yet another criminal war, but affecting all to some degree from pole to pole. For we are at yet another of those crises, turning points in our short and puzzling species’ history, each one more critically decisive because of the gravity of the immediate threats to our survival that we insist on confronting.
This site is the work of a “think tank” of one — a generalist, futurist, and futant, by genetic proclivity, in one skin. Concomitantly, however, I acknowledge everyone, including the alien “community, witting or unwitting, as collaborators because, as a generic human, I want to know how everything and everyone relate to every other thing and person. In a word, the focus is the universe. That may seem a bit grandiose, but in this age of decadent and, often, funding-dependent specialization, someone had better damn well do it.
As a generalist, I am currently focused on resolving the ancient conflicts, contradictions, questions, and paradoxes of our species’ puzzling and clearly manipulated history — in the context of the universe. The goal: to bring our knowledge to the stage of change marked by the fifth line of Hexagram 57, The Gentle, Penetration, of the venerable I Ching:
Remorse vanishes.
Nothing that does not further.
No beginning, but an end.
Good fortune.
Which change morphs the situation into Hexagram 18, Work on what has been spoiled: the futurist, on the lookout for the “wild cards” that may ambush or afford accelerated advantage, integrates the potential and cautionary signals of cutting edge developments in all disciplines and arenas with the retrieved past to transform what has been spoiled into an overarching, comprehensive, generically human, forward-creative paradigm.
What has been spoiled, wasted, all these millennia, are generation after generation of our young, the lives of countless millions, through the Babel-factored conflicts and hideous wars, more often than not due to nothing more or less than the insane “my god is better than your god” syndrome. True, as a genetically engineered slave species, we should go a little easy on ourselves due to the, perhaps, uniqueness of our “unnatural” situation, but that does not mitigate the immediacy of the danger of the mess we have gotten ourselves into planet-wide. And what is the mess all about?
The perspective of the futant view from 2100 A.D. finds our denial of our beginnings and history, our Babel-factored ignorance of what and who we are, our continuance in cargo cult, godspell, slave-code “religions”, our disconnect with nature, our resignation to death, our ridiculous reaction to the prominent alien presence, our lack of comprehension of our real evolutionary trajectory, embarrassingly primitive. This syndrome is the most fundamental formative factor behind the clash of civilizations, nations, tribes, and individuals.
It’s best to begin to give a futant report from an anchor point in the present, logically, in this case, from within the center of the current crisis. It is difficult, however, because there is no encapsulating the essence of this crisis as political, or economic, or sociological, or scientific, or military, philosophical, or religious: it is inescapably about everything. Its inexorable, ponderous churning, disturbing the bodies and minds of everyone on planet and off, is about entire world views, solar system views and views of the cosmos, human and alien. Personal realities, the strong or tenuous views of self-identity, of individuals, groups, of cultures, religions, nations, and what it fundamentally is to be generically human on this planet, are constantly being probed and challenged, the constant irritation leading to profound unease, disease, and overt conflict.
What is the fundamental, core problem? The entire planet, all its cultures, religions, politics, and sociology, including the definition of “human,” requires, indeed demands, radical rethinking, including the institutions and authorities to which we have always looked for truth and validation.
What has brought the planet to this point? By 2000, we in the West had accumulated more than sufficient evidence and data to restore the true history of our amazing beginnings and precocious development to ourselves, and found ourselves to have been far deeper in denial, indeed close to species amnesia, about those vital facts than we in the East. The gradually accumulated, overwhelming archaeological and historical information and data from the past, elucidated by the science of the present, give clear, overwhelming evidence of an entirely new, comprehensive, overarching worldview that corrects, subsumes, and replaces the old. This new paradigm is attributed to the Nobel-quality work of the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin.
The Key to Planetary Unity
The key fact that is the cause of the revolution in interpretation and understanding is that the transcultural gods (the Anunnaki [Sumerian: those who came down from the heavens; Hebrew: Anakeim, Nefilim; Egyptian: Neter, the “Watchers”) known to all the ancient civilizations, as Sitchin has conclusively demonstrated, were not mythological, but real flesh and blood humanoids. They were, most probably still are, an alien civilization who colonized this planet 432,000 years ago coming from their home planet, the tenth, Planet X, Nibiru, in our own solar system. They came here for gold, eventually created us by genetically crossing their genes with those of Homo Erectus around 200,000 years ago as a slave race for their mining operations. That profound reinterpretation of our beginnings and subsequent development changes everything. Literally.
Corroboration comes from evidence for the existence in our solar system of Planet X/Nibiru from the Naval Observatory, probably found by the IRAS search in ’83-’94; the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve”; the “out of Africa” data placing our genesis in Central Africa 250,000 years.
The ramifications and consequences I explored and laid out in 1987 in Breaking the Godspell are astounding, startling, and powerful. The word from station DNA is these “gods” wear designer genes.
We are a genetically engineered, mutant species with bicameral genetics, a bicameral mind, moving through a rapid, non-Darwinian development, now coming out of species adolescence into an independent maturity and identity. We have progressed from being their slave animals to a limited partnership and are now phasing out of a 3000-year traumatic transition to racial independence, a rapid metamorphic process, under the imperative of our advanced Nefilim genetic component.
Religion, as we know it worldwide, is the residual sublimation and transmutation of the ancient master-slave relationship, the godspell, expressed in the slave-code commandments still echoing down the ages in our cargo-cult rituals of subservient worship (work-ship). It is manifest that Jehovah/YHWH, Adonai, the Lord, and Allah, El, were all Anunnaki. The concept of “God” as a stern male disciplinarian doling out horrendous physical punishments, as well as the cosmified metaphysical edition is no longer adequate and almost embarrassing. Those who still swear by the Bible, in any of its myriad versions, as the revealed word of their “God” have to ignore or deny the apparent fact that the Old Testament was a skewed and forged theo-political rewrite of a far more ancient document, the Enuma Elish, dating from at least Sumeria, which was not theological at all.
Transcendental experience is redefined as dimensional expansion and participation at the leading edge of our species and individual metamorphic self-exploration. The “occult” is time-release packages of advanced technological information entrusted to us in “crash courses” in civilization. Ooparts, high-tech tools, toys, and artifacts, “out of place” in time, are remnants of lost technology and knowledge and clues to recovering our true history. The new synthesis subsumes partial glimpses of a new politic, new world order, enlightened eco-economics, re-hashed Eastern or Western mysticism, a third culture, spiritualized psychology, or cerebral turning points.
This is the only worldview that is comprehensive and robust enough to explain and correct all our previous explanations of the fundamental question: Who are we, and where did we really come from? It is the only paradigm that is coherent and comprehensive enough to provide a planetarily consensual context by which to unify all humans, achieve world order and peace, and free us, as a species, to matriculate into stellar society. We now have the keys to integrate our past into the concept of generic humanity, the critical factor for planetary unity. We have had at hand for an embarrassingly long time, more than enough evidence, information, and capabilities to literally rethink this Planet. We are long overdue, to the point of species endangerment, to get on with it.
What to do after genetic enlightenment has broken the godspell, the looking-to-the-sky-for-daddy to return, master-slave attitude, the deepest dye in the fabrics of all cultures? Physical immortality, possessed by the Nefilim and withheld from humans, will be transformed from a “religious” afterlife reward to the dominant characteristic of the dawning phase of our racial maturation. We will be our own “gods”, our own genetic credentials, play our own god-games with an unassailable racial identity, enabling us to step confidently into stellar society. I explored these dimensions as a practicing immortal in God Games: What Do You Do Forever?
It is the children who are the prime concern here. The view from 2100 says clearly that Sapiens is indeed rising. These futant experiential intelligence briefings, the product of best effort, are offered respectfully and cautiously to the end that Sapiens, having retrieved the common genealogy and history, caught the direction of the trajectory of freedom, will grasp a sense of species identity and planetary unity. We work toward the time when, having achieved friendly separation from the ancient parents, come out of dazed species adolescence, Sapiens will finally break into laughter at the absurdity of godspell separation and, looking around, see that the children are, for the first time, with great relief, also sharing the laughter. We all need to work on what has been spoiled for their sake and ours. I invite you to join in the process. In order to intelligently work on what has been spoiled in the past, it is best to understand those effects in the present.
This crisis has been building for three thousand years. It has peaked now, in hindsight inevitably and predictably, through the confluence of data and information in every element of human thought and experience and psychology at the deepest levels of our being, an inexorable upwelling of our real evolution. The most psychotic and degenerate manifestation of this crisis is the primitive and recurrent “my god is better than your god” syndrome that has generated wars, crusades, jihads without end, and is clearly operational in the current international situation. In the context of the new paradigm, this is clearly and simply the playing out of the ancient Babel-factored situation.
What is retarding the situation is the godspell mentality, the Babel-factoring of religions, the established patterns and cultures and power structures, the tendency still to be subservient to authority, to look to the outside for answers and “help”. The situation is further complicated by the fact that the very criteria bases, religion, philosophy, science, and the new age vision, that we have looked to for verification of the latest, are themselves up for reinterpretation and transformation. There is little doubt in my mind that the recognition and acceptance of this new world view, as prominent and robust as it is for so many already, may take a hundred years although, for those who have broken the godspell, the crises, problems, conflicts, questions, all have had answers and been solved potentially, and some, actually, for a long time. In a word: it’s already all over.
From the most personal perspective, just about everything I’ve published on this site, as advanced or “far out” depending on the reader’s orientation as it may seem, is ancient, not to make a bad pun. What we usually call “news”, about wars and rumors of wars, the fluctuations of the stock market, political elections, scientific advances, etc., is, literally and figuratively, against the backdrop of the new worldview, ancient history. Until we restore our real history as generic humans and throw off the Babel-factor influences that keep us separate and at odds, there will always be the underlying potential for yet another theo-political conflict, war, jihad, crusade, ethnic cleansing, tribal clash, oppression of minority, religious persecution, economic or territorial aggression, or broad-scale civilizational conflict. Conversely, new discoveries in ancient history and archaeological finds are significant news because they afford us vital information to fill in the details of our restored, amazing past. New scientific discoveries that enable us to understand the Anunnaki’s advanced science are also critical: astronomy, genetics, and physics have contributed as much as archaeology.
Because of the immensity of the revolution in thought and behavior, which is clearly required, literally rethinking the planet, it at first almost boggles the mind to envision in what way it can be and will be brought about. I submit, however, that it is the gradual recognition of the alien presence ( the UFO phenomenon in popular parlance) on and around the planet that is the primary factor already facilitating the implementation of the new planetary paradigm. Just as archaeology has restored our real history, astronomy has revealed how and from where an alien civilization could come here and initiate that history, genetics has revealed the science by which they began it, anthropology has facilitated our understanding of our unique and precocious development, the alien presence compels humankind to adjust to a stellar perspective and solar system travel becomes almost trivial, our sophisticated roller skates on Mars rather boring. As Ronald Reagan pointed out in five primary addresses, including one at the U.N., any perceived threat from the “outside” would bring all the nations of the world together, and our differences would all seem petty. As I have argued in the white paper, The Alien Question, it is significant that both the alien presence in general and our half-alien history are equally suppressed because both threaten the position and power of the political and religious elites. The revelation and acknowledgment of either diminishes the authority and control of both. China, Belgium, Spain, Chile, Uruguay, and now Mexico have officially acknowledged the alien presence; the United States has not—publicly and officially. Paradoxically, the nation that considers itself the most “advanced” country in the world has seemingly begun, after only 200 years, to lose its forward-looking, pioneering vision. When Cortez arrived in Mexico, they mistook him for the “god” who said he would return. It is rather apparent that they only made a mistake. Mexico may become the teacher of the world when the Anunnaki, most likely Enki, returns as promised and recorded in the Codexes when we are grown up enough to again make contact.
This paper is copyrighted by Neil Freer, but it may be freely downloaded, by the author’s permission granted here, translated, printed, copied, quoted, distributed in any appropriate media, provided only that it not be altered in any way in text or intent, and the author is properly credited.
You can, with the formula in CAPS below, keep the actual spiritual experiences you had within any religious institution yet free yourself from the institution’s intolerances.
Remember, if it is your experience, when you felt ecstatic connection with everyone, everything, and the divine in a church, synagogue, mosque, or temple run by an organized, hierarchical religion. Remember the beauty of the locale, the feeling of oneness with people leading and participating in religious ritual and song in the house of worship. Focus on the actual, internal experience you have as you feel the wonder of oneness with all.
If you wish to free yourself from the intellectual dogma, money-raising, and pressure to conform to the religion’s social expectations, do what the cues CAPITALIZED below suggest.
ENVISION THE CHURCH, SYNAGOGUE, MOSQUE, OR TEMPLE IN WHICH YOU HAD SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES. IMMERSE YOURSELF AGAIN IN THE SOUNDS, SMELLS, AND EMOTIONS YOU HAVE IN THE PLACE. HEAR AND SEE THE MUSIC, SONGS, SERMONS. RE-EXPERIENCE YOUR SPIRITUAL FEELINGS THEN.
IMAGINE YOU WALK OUT OF THE BUILDING. TAKE WITH YOU THE SPIRITUAL FEELING YOU HAD IN THE HOUSE OF WORSHIP. IF YOU CONNECTED WITH A GUIDE OR SPIRITUAL ARCHETYPE, IMAGINE THAT GUIDE ACCOMPANIES YOU AS YOU WALK OUT.
IN YOUR MIND, BURN THE BUILDING, AND WITH IT, BURN AWAY THE DOGMA, EXPECTATIONS, AND TITHING PRESSURE.
IF YOU LEFT THE CHURCH OR TEMPLE WITH A GUIDE (Jesus, for example), ASK THE GUIDE YOU TOOK WITH YOU IF HE OR SHE’S BEST FOR YOU NOW OR WHETHER SHE OR HE SHOULD TAKE YOU TO ANOTHER GUIDE (say Kwan Yin or Buddha).
IF THERE’S A BETTER GUIDE FOR YOU RIGHT NOW, LET THE GUIDE WITH WHOM YOU ACCESSED YOUR SPIRITUALITY IN THE HOUSE OF WORSHIP PUT YOUR HAND IN THE HAND OF YOUR NEW SPIRITUAL GUIDE.
LET THE NEW GUIDE ACCESS YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS AND RESPOND TO YOUR DEEPEST CONCERNS WITH
*ADVICE,
*A VISION TO GUIDE YOU,
*SUGGESTION OF A PHYSICAL OBJECT TO CONTEMPLATE AND
*A TALISMAN TO CARRY TO REMIND YOU OF YOUR CONNECTION WITH HER OR HIM.
TIMOTHY LEARY GOT IT RIGHT – Latent Anunnaki Genes’ll Free Us from the Matrix
“He’s inside” –Moody Blues
“Homo Sapiens is on the threshold of discovering that expanding intelligence is the goal of the trip, not in external materials but inside the time envelope of the body. That power resides not in the muscles and muscle-surrogate machines, but in the brain. The evolutionary blueprint is in the genetic [latent Anunnaki genes in our genome] scriptures; that Higher Intelligence is to be found in the galaxy.” –Timothy Leary, quoted in Freer, Neil, Sapiens Rising.
“300,000 years ago, “the Anunnaki [astronaut-goldminers from the planet Nibiru] jumped the gun on [Earth’s] evolution and, using genetic engineering, upgraded a hominid, Homo erectus, to an intelligent, tool-handling Homo sapiens. to be their serf. It happened in the Great Rift Valley of southeast Africa, just north of the gold-mining region.
“The wild hominid of the Abzu [Africa] had DNA similar enough to the Anunnaki’s that just a little genetic mixing produced a Being that, according to Sumerians and the Bible, was akin to the `gods’ both inwardly and outwardly except for their longevity. All life on Earth, from birds to fish, flora to algae, and down to bacteria and viruses, all have the very same DNA, the four nucleic acid letters from which all genes and genomes are made. The DNA of the Anunnaki was the same as the DNA of all life on Nibiru. The DNA on Earth and the DNA on Nibiru were the same.”
Our genome, with fewer than 30,000 genes, contains 223 genes that lack predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree. These 223 genes were found to be completely missing in the whole range of the vertebrate phase of evolution. These genes involve physiological and cerebral functions to humans.”
[Sitchin, Z., 2010, There Were Giants Upon the Earth, pages 153 -162]
xxxxxx
*ANUNNAKI EVOLUTION OF THE GODS *
by Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. (Anthropology, UCLA) & Janet Kira Lessin (CEO, Aquarian Radio)
amazon.com/Anunnaki-Gods-Dr-Sasha-Lessin/dp/1479372218
(Preview)
Long-lived (hundreds of thousands of years) extraterrestrial Homo sapiens Goliaths from the planet Nibiru mined gold on Earth 400,000 years ago. 300,000 years ago they created Earth-adapted, short-lived mine slaves—that’s us–from their genome. We called them “Anunnaki,” People-From-The-Sky or Serpent-People. They taught us hierarchy, violence, greed, slavery, and debt. They made us worship them, call them “gods.”
200,000 years ago, Enki, their Chief Scientist, begat a line of Earthlings whom he exalted. In 11,000 [all dates to follow are—before the common era—unless otherwise designated] Enki and his lover Batanash begat Noah. After Noah’s flood, the Anunnaki ruled through Noah’s sons’ descendants.
The Anunnaki ruined their eastern Mediterranean cities with nuclear blasts and fallout storms. Most of the Anunnaki returned to Nibiru by 311 BCE.
But some stayed. They and their descendants (the power elite) rule us to this day.
The Anunnaki taught one-upsmanship. We watched them kill each other to rule; the elite today still kill each other and their followers. Our ancestors plundered, enslaved or killed whomever their master, the dominant Nibiran in their area, told them. We Earthlings still plunder, enslave, and kill whomever our elites tell us.
The Anunnaki loosed plagues, nuclear bombs, and other weapons of mass killing upon us. They forced upon us mutually unintelligible languages and scripts and withheld knowledge. They and their spawn made exclusive, hostile nations and religions to keep us divided. They addicted us to credit institutions to keep us slaving.
The Anunnaki stand feet taller and live millennia longer than we. We killed in their names: Allah (= Sumerian Nannar), Yahweh (Enlil, sometimes Adad) and Inanna (Ishtar)–Nibiran Expedition personnel all. They bred us to slave in mines, armies, businesses, schools, governments, farms, factories, brothels and building projects.
We worshipped and them and the “royal” lines of ever-murderous hybrid rulers and priests–the elite–they begat.
Most of the Anunnaki returned to Nibiru. A few who remained on Earth and the hybrids through whom they still rule give all factions and nations credit and arms and engineer wars among them. The elite run competing religions, each claiming it will bring back the Anunnaki god of its faith and defeat the gods and followers of other faiths.
The ancient scenarios of divide-and-rule, to this very day, make us deplete our resources, pollute our environment, and wage war. The matrix the Anunnaki modeled makes us recklessly exploit our resources and pollute. The elite and their ET controllers see that we never feel our unity as a planet of peace.
Anunnaki and hybrid overseers imprinted their greed, one-upsmanship, and dominator-consciousness on us. They modeled, dictated, and indoctrinated avarice, domination, slavery, competition, hate, and violence.
Yahweh and Allah-Nannar murdered many. These Anunnaki lacked compassion, showed neither love nor divinity.
Other Anunnaki–Enki, Ningishzidda, and Ninmah–love us and continue to work to free us from the mental virus with whichYahweh and Allah have infected us. Enki, Ninmah and Ningishzidda can, when we stop warring, advance our astronomy, medicine, energy, rocket science and survival strategies.
The Anunnaki dictated their worldview to the Earthling scribes of Iraq (then called Sumer). Clay tablets, the gods dictated, say that back on Nibiru, a king and his military ruled. The gods dictated tales of how, 450,000 years ago, they got gold from Earth and how, till 300,000 years ago, when they created us for the mines, they shipped the gold back to Nibiru. Their tales of their stay on Earth before they made our ancestors, as well as what our forefathers directly saw, imprinted us with the values of their hierarchical, male-run, master-slave-enemy mentality. We assumed values of extraction, pollution, monetary monopoly, and obsession with gold.
Millions of years before the Anunnaki got to Earth, other ET terraformers seeded hominoids here. The terraformers introduced advanced hominoids, ancestors of Erectus, Neanderthals, and Bigfoot, to Earth so the Anunnaki could implant Erectus genes into the Homo sapiens genome and thus adapt it to Earth. The Anunnaki created what the terraformers planned for us—they made us Homo sapiens like them, but adapted to Earth [Pye, 2013]. Eighty percent of our DNA is from off-planet [Tellinger, 2011b].
We progressed when the Anunnaki gave us new technologies. Every 3,600 years, they gave us marvelous devices, astronomical and geological information, new crops, new chemistry, and ever-more lethal weapons. Suddenly, our architecture, public projects, weaponry, and military training revved up, and we built new cities, temples, and armies.
Our Sumerian ancestors didn’t imagine gods who made them literate and told them what to write. Rather than make up gods, Sumerians saw, heard, and bred with Anunnaki as very tall, long-lived. Sumerians watched the giants run machines and computers; they saw them fire weapons of mass destruction. They saw Anunnaki with small devices, MEs, overpowering other Anunnaki.
Sumerians saw Anunnaki speak into devices and heard voices respond. The Anunnaki said the voices came from spacecraft beyond sight and the moon, southern Africa, the Andes, and the Indus Valley, as well as from visible rockets, shuttlecraft, orbiting stations, and planes.
In Sumer, then all over this planet, the gods gave our ancestors ever-advanced technologies and models so their half-breeds could rule, relate, mine, store data, compute, write, build, trade and war.
Mesopotamians, Egyptians, Indians, Norse, Chinese, Tibetans, Central and South Americans all spoke of these gods who rode Celestial Chariots, threw thunderbolts, and, when Nibiru neared Earth, gave us crops, herds, devices, medicine, laws, knowledge, and more Nibiran genes.
In 2000, Zecharia Sitchin showed us proof in clay and stone. Rocks and inscribed records, astronomical, geological, geographical, chemical, and biological info Sumerians said gods gave them, info our scientists only got millennia later.
Sitchin solved the mysteries of missing hominid links that were never found since they didn’t exist. He showed how they periodically uplifted our society and its industries. No missing physical links existed since we appeared suddenly, when Enki and his cohorts added Erectus genes to their genome. We got advanced technology when Sumerian “gods” gave it to us.
Sumerians tagged Anunnaki aircraft, submarines, helicopters, spaceships, weapons, and computers with their own words and words the gods taught them. Our ancestors called aircraft and rockets “skyships, “celestial chariots,” and “fire-breathing dragons.” They named helicopters “whirlbirds.” A whale that swallowed Jonah = a submarine; weapons = “brilliances.” We labeled Nibiran medical and scientific achievements “miracles.”
Our ancestors recorded the history, scientific words, and concepts the gods taught them. What the gods called “MEs” we call computer programs. Our cultures added descriptions, metaphors, similes,s and analogies to the words the gods gave us. We can now decode our ancestors’ metaphors for the gods and their technology, rather than dismissing the weapons, vehicles, and personalities of the gods as superstitious myths.
Unless ETs intervene to save us or the weight of Sumerian evidence convinces Muslims, Jews, and Christians to give up their fear gods, their compulsions to obey governmental and religious authorities unquestioningly, their impulse to crush others, and the mental programs with which the genocidal Anunnaki imposed on us to keep us divided and conquered, we’ll keep warring.
We are one family, and we’ve all been duped by the Anunnaki and their halfbreed successor line of murderous manipulators. We must recover our oneness as a species. As we face new ET demands for our allegiance and gold, we can negotiate for life extension, medicine, free energy, space transport and other ET technologies. We and they can support each other and face our common challenges–environmental, social and psychological.
The truth of our genetics frees us from the master-slave, god-devotee, boss-worker, lord-tenant model the ETs imposed on us. We can end physical and economic slavery, hierarchic obsession, derogation of women, gold lust, antagonistic religions and nations the gods and the hybrid elite they created dictated.
Free of short, desperate lives, we’ll create our future. We’ll activate our latent Nibiran genes, better our genome and join galactic civilization.
….
ANUNNAKI & ANCIENT ANTHROPOLOGY EVIDENCE, REFERENCES, TIMELINE & WHO’S WHO
Evidence https://wp.me/p1TVCy-1zg
References http://wp.me/p1TVCy-2cq
Timeline http://wp.me/p1TVCy-1Km
Who’s Who http://wp.me/p1TVCy-1PE
New Stuff www.enkispeaks.com
More on the gods of old who gave us Anunnaki religions
