Henry VIII William Robert Thompson

HENRY VIII, King of England ~ (12th GGF & 14th Great Grand Uncle)

I’m related to Henry VIII through marriage and also possibly through his illegitimate children with Mary Boleyn. I’m still trying to figure this out. Last night (05-28-2021) I discovered Henry is my 14th Great Grand Uncle) on my father’s side. I’m related to him as a cousin on my mother’s side as well. I thought for a while that I was descended from Henry through Mary Boleyn, his mistress. But she married twice after bearing Henry at least one illegitimate child (maybe two).

My 12th great-grandmother is: Lady Anne (Anna Eleanor) Stafford, daughter of Mary Boleyn (Lover of Henry VIII, King of England and husband Anne Boleyn, Mary’s sister) (12th GGM) – 1535–1613

BIRTH MARCH 1535 • Rochford, Essex, England
DEATH 1613 • Bedhampton, Hampshire, England

I also discovered through another branch of my ancestry tree that Mary Boleyn is my 13th GGM. Henry was her lover and she had at least two children with him. Maybe more. So I could possibly have Henry VIII’s DNA running through me, but that’s less likely.

My 13th great-grandmother is Lady Mary (Maria) Boleyn m. Carey (1520-1528), m. Stafford (1534-1543), Lover of Henry VIII (13th GGM) – 1499–1543

BIRTH 1499 • Blickling Hall, Hever Castle, Norfolk, England
DEATH 19 JULY 1543 • Rochford, Essex, England

Here’s how I am descended from Henry by one of his illegitimate children Sir Henry Carey:

Henry VIII’s grandparents were King Edward IV and Queen Elizabeth Woodville (My 14th Maternal Great-Grandparents). They were featured in “The White Queen” series about the War of the Roses. On one branch of my tree, I am their descendent through their second daughter, Cecily.

Their daughter, Elizabeth of York married Henry VII which united the Yorks and Tudors, thus ending the endless War of the Roses. Their son was the notorious Henry VIII.

I also discovered through another branch of my ancestry tree that Mary Boleyn is my 13th GGM. Henry was her lover and she had at least two children with him. Maybe more. So I could possibly have Henry VIII’s DNA running through me, but that’s less likely.

Henry VIII
Portrait of Henry VIII after Hans Holbein the Younger, c. 1537–1547
King of England
Lord/King of Ireland (more…)
Reign22 April 1509 – 28 January 1547
Coronation24 June 1509
PredecessorHenry VII
SuccessorEdward VI
BornHenry Tudor
28 June 1491
Palace of PlacentiaGreenwichKent, England
Died28 January 1547 (aged 55)
Palace of Whitehall, London, England
Burial16 February 1547
St George’s Chapel, Windsor CastleBerkshire
SpousesCatherine of Aragon​​(m. 1509; ann. 1533)​Anne Boleyn​​(m. 1533; ann. 1536)​Jane Seymour​​(m. 1536; d. 1537)​Anne of Cleves​​(m. 1540; ann. 1540)​Catherine Howard​​(m. 1540; d. 1542)​Catherine Parr
​​(m. 1543)​
Among others
Henry, Duke of CornwallMary I of EnglandHenry FitzRoy, Duke of Richmond and Somerset (illegitimate)Elizabeth I of EnglandEdward VI of England
FatherHenry VII of England
MotherElizabeth of York
ReligionChurch of England (1534–1547)Roman Catholicism (1491–1534)

Henry VIII (28 June 1491 – 28 January 1547) was King of England from 1509 until his death in 1547. Henry is best known for his six marriages, and, in particular, his efforts to have his first marriage (to Catherine of Aragon) annulled. His disagreement with Pope Clement VII about such an annulment led Henry to initiate the English Reformation, separating the Church of England from papal authority. He appointed himself Supreme Head of the Church of England and dissolved convents and monasteries, for which he was excommunicated. Henry is also known as “the father of the Royal Navy,” as he invested heavily in the navy, increasing its size from a few to more than 50 ships, and established the Navy Board. [1]

Domestically, Henry is known for his radical changes to the English Constitution, ushering in the theory of the divine right of kings. He also greatly expanded royal power during his reign. He frequently used charges of treason and heresy to quell dissent, and those accused were often executed without a formal trial by means of bills of attainder. He achieved many of his political aims through the work of his chief ministers, some of whom were banished or executed when they fell out of his favor. Thomas WolseyThomas MoreThomas CromwellRichard Rich, and Thomas Cranmer all figured prominently in his administration.

Henry was an extravagant spender, using the proceeds from the dissolution of the monasteries and acts of the Reformation Parliament. He also converted the money that was formerly paid to Rome into royal revenue. Despite the money from these sources, he was continually on the verge of financial ruin due to his personal extravagance, as well as his numerous costly and largely unsuccessful wars, particularly with King Francis I of FranceHoly Roman Emperor Charles V, King James V of Scotland and the Scottish regency under the Earl of Arran and Mary of Guise. At home, he oversaw the legal union of England and Wales with the Laws in Wales Acts 1535 and 1542, and he was the first English monarch to rule as King of Ireland following the Crown of Ireland Act 1542.

Henry’s contemporaries considered him an attractive, educated, and accomplished king. He has been described as “one of the most charismatic rulers to sit on the English throne” and his reign has been described as the “most important” in English history.[2][3] He was an author and composer. As he aged, he became severely overweight and his health suffered. He is frequently characterized in his later life as a lustful, egotistical, paranoid, and tyrannical monarch.[4] He was succeeded by his son Edward VI.



Early years

Illustration from Vaux Passional thought to show Henry (top) mourning his mother, with his sisters, Mary and Margaret, at age 11, 1503

Born on 28 June 1491 at the Palace of Placentia in Greenwich, Kent, Henry Tudor was the third child and second son of Henry VII and Elizabeth of York.[5] Of the young Henry’s six (or seven) siblings, only three – his brother Arthur, Prince of Wales, and sisters Margaret and Mary – survived infancy.[6] He was baptised by Richard Fox, the Bishop of Exeter, at a church of the Observant Franciscans close to the palace.[7] In 1493, at the age of two, Henry was appointed Constable of Dover Castle and Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports. He was subsequently appointed Earl Marshal of England and Lord Lieutenant of Ireland at age three and was made a Knight of the Bath soon after. The day after the ceremony, he was created Duke of York and a month or so later made Warden of the Scottish Marches. In May 1495, he was appointed to the Order of the Garter. The reason for giving such appointments to a small child was to enable his father to retain personal control of lucrative positions and not share them with established families.[7]

Not much is known about Henry’s early life – save for his appointments – because he was not expected to become king,[7] but it is known that he received a first-rate education from leading tutors. He became fluent in Latin and French and learned at least some Italian.[8][9]

In November 1501, Henry played a considerable part in the ceremonies surrounding his brother’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon, the youngest surviving child of King Ferdinand II of Aragon and Queen Isabella I of Castile.[10] As Duke of York, Henry used the arms of his father as king, differenced by a label of three points ermine. He was further honoured, on 9 February 1506, by Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I, who made him a Knight of the Golden Fleece.[11]

In 1502, Arthur died at the age of 15, possibly of sweating sickness,[12] just 20 weeks after his marriage to Catherine.[13] Arthur’s death thrust all his duties upon his younger brother, the 10-year-old Henry. After a little debate, Henry became the new Duke of Cornwall in October 1502, and the new Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester in February 1503.[14] Henry VII gave the boy few responsibilities even after the death of his brother Arthur. Young Henry was strictly supervised and did not appear in public. As a result, he ascended the throne “untrained in the exacting art of kingship”.[15]

Henry VII renewed his efforts to seal a marital alliance between England and Spain, by offering his second son in marriage to Arthur’s widow Catherine.[13] Both Isabella and Henry VII were keen on the idea, which had arisen very shortly after Arthur’s death.[16] On 23 June 1503, a treaty was signed for their marriage, and they were betrothed two days later.[17] A papal dispensation was only needed for the “impediment of public honesty” if the marriage had not been consummated as Catherine and her duenna claimed, but Henry VII and the Spanish ambassador set out instead to obtain a dispensation for “affinity“, which took account of the possibility of consummation.[17] Cohabitation was not possible because Henry was too young.[16] Isabella’s death in 1504, and the ensuing problems of succession in Castile, complicated matters. Her father preferred her to stay in England, but Henry VII’s relations with Ferdinand had deteriorated.[18] Catherine was therefore left in limbo for some time, culminating in Prince Henry’s rejection of the marriage as soon he was able, at the age of 14. Ferdinand’s solution was to make his daughter ambassador, allowing her to stay in England indefinitely. Devout, she began to believe that it was God’s will that she marry the prince despite his opposition.[19]

Early reign

Henry VIII after his coronation (1509; age 18).

Henry VII died on 21 April 1509, and the 17-year-old Henry succeeded him as king. Soon after his father’s burial on 10 May, Henry suddenly declared that he would indeed marry Catherine, leaving unresolved several issues concerning the papal dispensation and a missing part of the marriage portion.[17][20] The new king maintained that it had been his father’s dying wish that he marry Catherine.[19] Whether or not this was true, it was certainly convenient. Emperor Maximilian I had been attempting to marry his granddaughter (and Catherine’s niece) Eleanor to Henry; she had now been jilted.[21] Henry’s wedding to Catherine was kept low-key and was held at the friar’s church in Greenwich on 11 June 1509.[20]

On 23 June 1509, Henry led the now 23-year-old Catherine from the Tower of London to Westminster Abbey for their coronation, which took place the following day.[22] It was a grand affair: the king’s passage was lined with tapestries and laid with fine cloth.[22] Following the ceremony, there was a grand banquet in Westminster Hall.[23] As Catherine wrote to her father, “our time is spent in continuous festival”.[20]

Two days after his coronation, Henry arrested his father’s two most unpopular ministers, Sir Richard Empson and Edmund Dudley. They were charged with high treason and were executed in 1510. Politically motivated executions would remain one of Henry’s primary tactics for dealing with those who stood in his way.[5] Henry also returned some of the money supposedly extorted by the two ministers.[24] By contrast, Henry’s view of the House of York – potential rival claimants for the throne – was more moderate than his father’s had been. Several who had been imprisoned by his father, including the Marquess of Dorset, were pardoned.[25] Others (most notably Edmund de la Pole) went unreconciled; de la Pole was eventually beheaded in 1513, an execution prompted by his brother Richard siding against the king.[26]

Soon after, Catherine conceived, but the child, a girl, was stillborn on 31 January 1510. About four months later, Catherine again became pregnant.[27] On 1 January 1511, New Year’s Day, the child – Henry – was born. After the grief of losing their first child, the couple were pleased to have a boy and festivities were held,[28] including a two-day joust known as the Westminster Tournament. However, the child died seven weeks later.[27] Catherine had two stillborn sons in 1513 and 1515, but gave birth in February 1516 to a girl, Mary. Relations between Henry and Catherine had been strained, but they eased slightly after Mary’s birth.[29]

Although Henry’s marriage to Catherine has since been described as “unusually good”,[30] it is known that Henry took mistresses. It was revealed in 1510 that Henry had been conducting an affair with one of the sisters of Edward Stafford, 3rd Duke of Buckingham, either Elizabeth or Anne Hastings, Countess of Huntingdon.[31] The most significant mistress for about three years, starting in 1516, was Elizabeth Blount.[29] Blount is one of only two completely undisputed mistresses, considered by some to be few for a virile young king.[32][33] Exactly how many Henry had is disputed: David Loades believes Henry had mistresses “only to a very limited extent”,[33] whilst Alison Weir believes there were numerous other affairs.[34] Catherine is not known to have protested. In 1518 she fell pregnant again with another girl, who was also stillborn.[29]

Blount gave birth in June 1519 to Henry’s illegitimate son, Henry FitzRoy.[29] The young boy was made Duke of Richmond in June 1525 in what some thought was one step on the path to his eventual legitimisation.[35] In 1533, FitzRoy married Mary Howard, but died childless three years later.[36] At the time of Richmond’s death in June 1536, Parliament was considering the Second Succession Act, which could have allowed him to become king.[37]

France and the Habsburgs

The meeting of Francis I and Henry VIII at the Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520

In 1510, France, with a fragile alliance with the Holy Roman Empire in the League of Cambrai, was winning a war against Venice. Henry renewed his father’s friendship with Louis XII of France, an issue that divided his council. Certainly, war with the combined might of the two powers would have been exceedingly difficult.[38] Shortly thereafter, however, Henry also signed a pact with Ferdinand. After Pope Julius II created the anti-French Holy League in October 1511,[38] Henry followed Ferdinand’s lead and brought England into the new League. An initial joint Anglo-Spanish attack was planned for the spring to recover Aquitaine for England, the start of making Henry’s dreams of ruling France a reality.[39] The attack, however, following a formal declaration of war in April 1512, was not led by Henry personally[40] and was a considerable failure; Ferdinand used it simply to further his own ends, and it strained the Anglo-Spanish alliance. Nevertheless, the French were pushed out of Italy soon after, and the alliance survived, with both parties keen to win further victories over the French.[40][41] Henry then pulled off a diplomatic coup by convincing the Emperor to join the Holy League.[42] Remarkably, Henry had also secured the promised title of “Most Christian King of France” from Julius and possibly coronation by the Pope himself in Paris, if only Louis could be defeated.[43]Henry with Charles V (right) and Pope Leo X (centre), c. 1520

On 30 June 1513, Henry invaded France, and his troops defeated a French army at the Battle of the Spurs – a relatively minor result, but one which was seized on by the English for propaganda purposes. Soon after, the English took Thérouanne and handed it over to Maximillian; Tournai, a more significant settlement, followed.[44] Henry had led the army personally, complete with a large entourage.[45] His absence from the country, however, had prompted his brother-in-law, James IV of Scotland, to invade England at the behest of Louis.[46] Nevertheless, the English army, overseen by Queen Catherine, decisively defeated the Scots at the Battle of Flodden on 9 September 1513.[47] Among the dead was the Scottish king, thus ending Scotland’s brief involvement in the war.[47] These campaigns had given Henry a taste of the military success he so desired. However, despite initial indications, he decided not to pursue a 1514 campaign. He had been supporting Ferdinand and Maximilian financially during the campaign but had received little in return; England’s coffers were now empty.[48] With the replacement of Julius by Pope Leo X, who was inclined to negotiate for peace with France, Henry signed his own treaty with Louis: his sister Mary would become Louis’ wife, having previously been pledged to the younger Charles, and peace was secured for eight years, a remarkably long time.[49]

Charles V ascended the thrones of both Spain and the Holy Roman Empire following the deaths of his grandfathers, Ferdinand in 1516 and Maximilian in 1519. Francis I likewise became king of France upon the death of Louis in 1515,[50] leaving three relatively young rulers and an opportunity for a clean slate. The careful diplomacy of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey had resulted in the Treaty of London in 1518, aimed at uniting the kingdoms of western Europe in the wake of a new Ottoman threat, and it seemed that peace might be secured.[51] Henry met Francis I on 7 June 1520 at the Field of the Cloth of Gold near Calais for a fortnight of lavish entertainment. Both hoped for friendly relations in place of the wars of the previous decade. The strong air of competition laid to rest any hopes of a renewal of the Treaty of London, however, and conflict was inevitable.[51] Henry had more in common with Charles, whom he met once before and once after Francis. Charles brought the Empire into war with France in 1521; Henry offered to mediate, but little was achieved and by the end of the year Henry had aligned England with Charles. He still clung to his previous aim of restoring English lands in France but also sought to secure an alliance with Burgundy, then part of Charles’ realm, and the continued support of Charles.[52] A small English attack in the north of France made up little ground. Charles defeated and captured Francis at Pavia and could dictate peace, but he believed he owed Henry nothing. Sensing this, Henry decided to take England out of the war before his ally, signing the Treaty of the More on 30 August 1525.[53]


Main article: Wives of Henry VIII

Annulment from Catherine

Catherine of Aragon, Henry’s first queen (early 18th century copy of lost original; depicted c. 1525, at about age 40).Henry (c. 1531; about age 40).

During his marriage to Catherine of Aragon, Henry conducted an affair with Mary Boleyn, Catherine’s lady-in-waiting. There has been speculation that Mary’s two children, Henry Carey and Catherine Carey, were fathered by Henry, but this has never been proved, and the King never acknowledged them as he did in the case of Henry FitzRoy.[54] In 1525, as Henry grew more impatient with Catherine’s inability to produce the male heir he desired,[55][56] he became enamoured of Boleyn’s sister, Anne Boleyn, then a charismatic young woman of 25 in the Queen’s entourage.[57] Anne, however, resisted his attempts to seduce her, and refused to become his mistress as her sister had.[58][nb 1] It was in this context that Henry considered his three options for finding a dynastic successor and hence resolving what came to be described at court as the King’s “great matter”. These options were legitimising Henry FitzRoy, which would need the involvement of the pope and would be open to challenge; marrying off Mary as soon as possible and hoping for a grandson to inherit directly, but Mary was considered unlikely to conceive before Henry’s death, or somehow rejecting Catherine and marrying someone else of child-bearing age. Probably seeing the possibility of marrying Anne, the third was ultimately the most attractive possibility to the 34-year-old Henry,[60] and it soon became the King’s absorbing desire to annul his marriage to the now 40-year-old Catherine.[61] It was a decision that would lead Henry to reject papal authority and initiate the English Reformation.[citation needed]

Henry’s precise motivations and intentions over the coming years are not widely agreed on.[62] Henry himself, at least in the early part of his reign, was a devout and well-informed Catholic to the extent that his 1521 publication Assertio Septem Sacramentorum (“Defence of the Seven Sacraments”) earned him the title of Fidei Defensor (Defender of the Faith) from Pope Leo X.[63] The work represented a staunch defence of papal supremacy, albeit one couched in somewhat contingent terms.[63] It is not clear exactly when Henry changed his mind on the issue as he grew more intent on a second marriage. Certainly, by 1527, he had convinced himself that Catherine had produced no male heir because their union was “blighted in the eyes of God”.[64] Indeed, in marrying Catherine, his brother’s wife, he had acted contrary to Leviticus 20:21.[nb 2] Henry now believed the Pope had lacked the authority to grant a dispensation from this impediment. It was this argument Henry took to Pope Clement VII in 1527 in the hope of having his marriage to Catherine annulled, forgoing at least one less openly defiant line of attack.[62] In going public, all hope of tempting Catherine to retire to a nunnery or otherwise stay quiet was lost.[65] Henry sent his secretary, William Knight, to appeal directly to the Holy See by way of a deceptively worded draft papal bull. Knight was unsuccessful; the Pope could not be misled so easily.[66]

Other missions concentrated on arranging an ecclesiastical court to meet in England, with a representative from Clement VII. Although Clement agreed to the creation of such a court, he never had any intention of empowering his legate, Lorenzo Campeggio, to decide in Henry’s favour.[66] This bias was perhaps the result of pressure from Emperor Charles V, Catherine’s nephew, but it is not clear how far this influenced either Campeggio or the Pope. After less than two months of hearing evidence, Clement called the case back to Rome in July 1529, from which it was clear that it would never re-emerge.[66] With the chance for an annulment lost, Cardinal Wolsey bore the blame. He was charged with praemunire in October 1529,[67] and his fall from grace was “sudden and total”.[66] Briefly reconciled with Henry (and officially pardoned) in the first half of 1530, he was charged once more in November 1530, this time for treason, but died while awaiting trial.[66][68] After a short period in which Henry took government upon his own shoulders,[69] Sir Thomas More took on the role of Lord Chancellor and chief minister. Intelligent and able, but also a devout Catholic and opponent of the annulment,[70] More initially cooperated with the king’s new policy, denouncing Wolsey in Parliament.[71]

A year later, Catherine was banished from court, and her rooms were given to Anne. Anne was an unusually educated and intellectual woman for her time and was keenly absorbed and engaged with the ideas of the Protestant Reformers, but the extent to which she herself was a committed Protestant is much debated.[59] When Archbishop of Canterbury William Warham died, Anne’s influence and the need to find a trustworthy supporter of the annulment had Thomas Cranmer appointed to the vacant position.[70] This was approved by the Pope, unaware of the King’s nascent plans for the Church.[72]

Henry was married to Catherine for 24 years. Their divorce has been described as a “deeply wounding and isolating” experience for Henry.[3]

Marriage to Anne Boleyn

See also: Henry VIII § ReformationPortrait of Anne Boleyn, Henry’s second queen; a later copy of an original painted c. 1534

In the winter of 1532, Henry met with Francis I at Calais and enlisted the support of the French king for his new marriage.[73] Immediately upon returning to Dover in England, Henry, now 41, and Anne went through a secret wedding service.[74] She soon became pregnant, and there was a second wedding service in London on 25 January 1533. On 23 May 1533, Cranmer, sitting in judgment at a special court convened at Dunstable Priory to rule on the validity of the king’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon, declared the marriage of Henry and Catherine null and void. Five days later, on 28 May 1533, Cranmer declared the marriage of Henry and Anne to be valid.[75] Catherine was formally stripped of her title as queen, becoming instead “princess dowager” as the widow of Arthur. In her place, Anne was crowned queen consort on 1 June 1533.[76] The queen gave birth to a daughter slightly prematurely on 7 September 1533. The child was christened Elizabeth, in honour of Henry’s mother, Elizabeth of York.[77]

Following the marriage, there was a period of consolidation, taking the form of a series of statutes of the Reformation Parliament aimed at finding solutions to any remaining issues, whilst protecting the new reforms from challenge, convincing the public of their legitimacy, and exposing and dealing with opponents.[78] Although the canon law was dealt with at length by Cranmer and others, these acts were advanced by Thomas CromwellThomas Audley and the Duke of Norfolk and indeed by Henry himself.[79] With this process complete, in May 1532 More resigned as Lord Chancellor, leaving Cromwell as Henry’s chief minister.[80] With the Act of Succession 1533, Catherine’s daughter, Mary, was declared illegitimate; Henry’s marriage to Anne was declared legitimate; and Anne’s issue declared to be next in the line of succession.[81] With the Acts of Supremacy in 1534, Parliament also recognised the King’s status as head of the church in England and, together with the Act in Restraint of Appeals in 1532, abolished the right of appeal to Rome.[82] It was only then that Pope Clement took the step of excommunicating Henry and Thomas Cranmer, although the excommunication was not made official until some time later.[nb 3]

The king and queen were not pleased with married life. The royal couple enjoyed periods of calm and affection, but Anne refused to play the submissive role expected of her. The vivacity and opinionated intellect that had made her so attractive as an illicit lover made her too independent for the largely ceremonial role of a royal wife and it made her many enemies. For his part, Henry disliked Anne’s constant irritability and violent temper. After a false pregnancy or miscarriage in 1534, he saw her failure to give him a son as a betrayal. As early as Christmas 1534, Henry was discussing with Cranmer and Cromwell the chances of leaving Anne without having to return to Catherine.[89] Henry is traditionally believed to have had an affair with Margaret (“Madge”) Shelton in 1535, although historian Antonia Fraser argues that Henry in fact had an affair with her sister Mary Shelton.[32]

Opposition to Henry’s religious policies was quickly suppressed in England. A number of dissenting monks, including the first Carthusian Martyrs, were executed and many more pilloried. The most prominent resisters included John Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, and Sir Thomas More, both of whom refused to take the oath to the King.[90] Neither Henry nor Cromwell sought at that stage to have the men executed; rather, they hoped that the two might change their minds and save themselves. Fisher openly rejected Henry as the Supreme Head of the Church, but More was careful to avoid openly breaking the Treasons Act of 1534, which (unlike later acts) did not forbid mere silence. Both men were subsequently convicted of high treason, however – More on the evidence of a single conversation with Richard Rich, the Solicitor General, and both were executed in the summer of 1535.[90]

These suppressions, as well as the Dissolution of the Lesser Monasteries Act of 1536, in turn contributed to more general resistance to Henry’s reforms, most notably in the Pilgrimage of Grace, a large uprising in northern England in October 1536.[91] Some 20,000 to 40,000 rebels were led by Robert Aske, together with parts of the northern nobility.[92] Henry VIII promised the rebels he would pardon them and thanked them for raising the issues. Aske told the rebels they had been successful and they could disperse and go home.[93] Henry saw the rebels as traitors and did not feel obliged to keep his promises to them, so when further violence occurred after Henry’s offer of a pardon he was quick to break his promise of clemency.[94] The leaders, including Aske, were arrested and executed for treason. In total, about 200 rebels were executed, and the disturbances ended.[95]

Execution of Anne Boleyn

Henry c. 1537

On 8 January 1536, news reached the king and the queen that Catherine of Aragon had died. The following day, Henry dressed all in yellow, with a white feather in his bonnet.[96] The queen was pregnant again, and she was aware of the consequences if she failed to give birth to a son. Later that month, the King was unhorsed in a tournament and was badly injured; it seemed for a time that his life was in danger. When news of this accident reached the queen, she was sent into shock and miscarried a male child at about 15 weeks’ gestation, on the day of Catherine’s funeral, 29 January 1536.[97] For most observers, this personal loss was the beginning of the end of this royal marriage.[98]

Although the Boleyn family still held important positions on the Privy Council, Anne had many enemies, including the Duke of Suffolk. Even her own uncle, the Duke of Norfolk, had come to resent her attitude to her power. The Boleyns preferred France over the Emperor as a potential ally, but the King’s favour had swung towards the latter (partly because of Cromwell), damaging the family’s influence.[99] Also opposed to Anne were supporters of reconciliation with Princess Mary (among them the former supporters of Catherine), who had reached maturity. A second annulment was now a real possibility, although it is commonly believed that it was Cromwell’s anti-Boleyn influence that led opponents to look for a way of having her executed.[100][101]

Anne’s downfall came shortly after she had recovered from her final miscarriage. Whether it was primarily the result of allegations of conspiracy, adultery, or witchcraft remains a matter of debate among historians.[59] Early signs of a fall from grace included the King’s new mistress, the 28-year-old Jane Seymour, being moved into new quarters,[102] and Anne’s brother, George Boleyn, being refused the Order of the Garter, which was instead given to Nicholas Carew.[103] Between 30 April and 2 May, five men, including Anne’s brother George, were arrested on charges of treasonable adultery and accused of having sexual relationships with the queen. Anne was also arrested, accused of treasonous adultery and incest. Although the evidence against them was unconvincing, the accused were found guilty and condemned to death. George Boleyn and the other accused men were executed on 17 May 1536.[104] At 8 am on 19 May 1536, Anne was executed on Tower Green.[105]

Marriage to Jane Seymour; domestic and foreign affairs

Jane Seymour (left) became Henry’s third wife, pictured at right with Henry and the young Prince Edward, c. 1545, by an unknown artist. At the time that this was painted, Henry was married to his sixth wife, Catherine Parr.

The day after Anne’s execution the 45-year-old Henry became engaged to Seymour, who had been one of the Queen’s ladies-in-waiting. They were married ten days later[106] at the Palace of WhitehallWhitehallLondon, in the Queen’s closet, by Bishop Gardiner.[107] On 12 October 1537, Jane gave birth to a son, Prince Edward, the future Edward VI.[108] The birth was difficult, and the queen died on 24 October 1537 from an infection and was buried in Windsor.[109] The euphoria that had accompanied Edward’s birth became sorrow, but it was only over time that Henry came to long for his wife. At the time, Henry recovered quickly from the shock.[110] Measures were immediately put in place to find another wife for Henry, which, at the insistence of Cromwell and the Privy Council, were focused on the European continent.[111]

With Charles V distracted by the internal politics of his many kingdoms and also external threats, and Henry and Francis on relatively good terms, domestic and not foreign policy issues had been Henry’s priority in the first half of the 1530s. In 1536, for example, Henry granted his assent to the Laws in Wales Act 1535, which legally annexed Wales, uniting England and Wales into a single nation. This was followed by the Second Succession Act (the Act of Succession 1536), which declared Henry’s children by Jane to be next in the line of succession and declared both Mary and Elizabeth illegitimate, thus excluding them from the throne. The king was also granted the power to further determine the line of succession in his will, should he have no further issue.[112] However, when Charles and Francis made peace in January 1539, Henry became increasingly paranoid, perhaps as a result of receiving a constant list of threats to the kingdom (real or imaginary, minor or serious) supplied by Cromwell in his role as spymaster.[113] Enriched by the dissolution of the monasteries, Henry used some of his financial reserves to build a series of coastal defences and set some aside for use in the event of a Franco-German invasion.[114]

Marriage to Anne of Cleves

Portrait of Anne of Cleves by Hans Holbein the Younger, 1539

Having considered the matter, Cromwell suggested Anne, the 25-year-old sister of the Duke of Cleves, who was seen as an important ally in case of a Roman Catholic attack on England, for the duke fell between Lutheranism and Catholicism.[115] Hans Holbein the Younger was dispatched to Cleves to paint a portrait of Anne for the king.[116] Despite speculation that Holbein painted her in an overly flattering light, it is more likely that the portrait was accurate; Holbein remained in favour at court.[117] After seeing Holbein’s portrait, and urged on by the complimentary description of Anne given by his courtiers, the 49-year-old king agreed to wed Anne.[118] However, it was not long before Henry wished to annul the marriage so he could marry another.[119][120] Anne did not argue, and confirmed that the marriage had never been consummated.[121] Anne’s previous betrothal to the Duke of Lorraine‘s son Francis provided further grounds for the annulment.[122] The marriage was subsequently dissolved, and Anne received the title of “The King’s Sister”, two houses and a generous allowance.[121] It was soon clear that Henry had fallen for the 17-year-old Catherine Howard, the Duke of Norfolk’s niece, the politics of which worried Cromwell, for Norfolk was a political opponent.[123]

Shortly after, the religious reformers (and protégés of Cromwell) Robert BarnesWilliam Jerome and Thomas Garret were burned as heretics.[121] Cromwell, meanwhile, fell out of favour although it is unclear exactly why, for there is little evidence of differences in domestic or foreign policy. Despite his role, he was never formally accused of being responsible for Henry’s failed marriage.[124] Cromwell was now surrounded by enemies at court, with Norfolk also able to draw on his niece’s position.[123] Cromwell was charged with treason, selling export licences, granting passports, and drawing up commissions without permission, and may also have been blamed for the failure of the foreign policy that accompanied the attempted marriage to Anne.[125][126] He was subsequently attainted and beheaded.[124]

Marriage to Catherine Howard

Miniature Portrait of Catherine Howard, Henry’s fifth wife, by Hans Holbein the Younger, 1540

On 28 July 1540 (the same day Cromwell was executed), Henry married the young Catherine Howard, a first cousin and lady-in-waiting of Anne Boleyn.[127] He was absolutely delighted with his new queen and awarded her the lands of Cromwell and a vast array of jewellery.[128] Soon after the marriage, however, Queen Catherine had an affair with the courtier Thomas Culpeper. She also employed Francis Dereham, who had previously been informally engaged to her and had an affair with her prior to her marriage, as her secretary. The Privy Council was informed of her affair with Dereham whilst Henry was away; Thomas Cranmer was dispatched to investigate, and he brought evidence of Queen Catherine’s previous affair with Dereham to the king’s notice.[129] Though Henry originally refused to believe the allegations, Dereham confessed. It took another meeting of the council, however, before Henry believed the accusations against Dereham and went into a rage, blaming the council before consoling himself in hunting.[130] When questioned, the queen could have admitted a prior contract to marry Dereham, which would have made her subsequent marriage to Henry invalid, but she instead claimed that Dereham had forced her to enter into an adulterous relationship. Dereham, meanwhile, exposed Queen Catherine’s relationship with Culpeper. Culpeper and Dereham were both executed, and Catherine too was beheaded on 13 February 1542.[131]

Marriage to Catherine Parr

Catherine Parr, Henry’s sixth and last wife

Henry married his last wife, the wealthy widow Catherine Parr, in July 1543.[132] A reformer at heart, she argued with Henry over religion. Henry remained committed to an idiosyncratic mixture of Catholicism and Protestantism; the reactionary mood that had gained ground after Cromwell’s fall had neither eliminated his Protestant streak nor been overcome by it.[133] Parr helped reconcile Henry with his daughters, Mary and Elizabeth.[134] In 1543, the Third Succession Act put them back in the line of succession after Edward. The same act allowed Henry to determine further succession to the throne in his will.[135]

Shrines destroyed and monasteries dissolved

Main article: Dissolution of the Monasteries

In 1538, the chief minister Thomas Cromwell pursued an extensive campaign against what the government termed “idolatry” practised under the old religion, culminating in September with the dismantling of the shrine of St. Thomas Becket at Canterbury. As a consequence, the king was excommunicated by Pope Paul III on 17 December of the same year.[87] In 1540, Henry sanctioned the complete destruction of shrines to saints. In 1542, England’s remaining monasteries were all dissolved, and their property transferred to the Crown. Abbots and priors lost their seats in the House of Lords; only archbishops and bishops remained. Consequently, the Lords Spiritual—as members of the clergy with seats in the House of Lords were known—were for the first time outnumbered by the Lords Temporal.

Second invasion of France and the “Rough Wooing” of Scotland

Main article: Rough WooingHenry in 1540, by Hans Holbein the Younger

The 1539 alliance between Francis and Charles had soured, eventually degenerating into renewed war. With Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn dead, relations between Charles and Henry improved considerably, and Henry concluded a secret alliance with the Emperor and decided to enter the Italian War in favour of his new ally. An invasion of France was planned for 1543.[136] In preparation for it, Henry moved to eliminate the potential threat of Scotland under the youthful James V. The Scots were defeated at Battle of Solway Moss on 24 November 1542,[137] and James died on 15 December. Henry now hoped to unite the crowns of England and Scotland by marrying his son Edward to James’ successor, Mary. The Scottish Regent Lord Arran agreed to the marriage in the Treaty of Greenwich on 1 July 1543, but it was rejected by the Parliament of Scotland on 11 December. The result was eight years of war between England and Scotland, a campaign later dubbed “the Rough Wooing“. Despite several peace treaties, unrest continued in Scotland until Henry’s death.[138][139][140]

Despite the early success with Scotland, Henry hesitated to invade France, annoying Charles. Henry finally went to France in June 1544 with a two-pronged attack. One force under Norfolk ineffectively besieged Montreuil. The other, under Suffolk, laid siege to Boulogne. Henry later took personal command, and Boulogne fell on 18 September 1544.[141][138] However, Henry had refused Charles’ request to march against Paris. Charles’ own campaign fizzled, and he made peace with France that same day.[139] Henry was left alone against France, unable to make peace. Francis attempted to invade England in the summer of 1545 but reached only the Isle of Wight before being repulsed in the Battle of the Solent. Financially exhausted, France and England signed the Treaty of Camp on 7 June 1546. Henry secured Boulogne for eight years. The city was then to be returned to France for 2 million crowns (£750,000). Henry needed the money; the 1544 campaign had cost £650,000, and England was once again bankrupt.[139]

Physical decline and death

Coffins of King Henry VIII (centre, damaged), Queen Jane (right), King Charles I with a child of Queen Anne (left), vault under the choir, St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle, marked by a stone slab in the floor. 1888 sketch by Alfred Young Nutt, Surveyor to the Dean and Canons

Late in life, Henry became obese, with a waist measurement of 54 inches (140 cm), and had to be moved about with the help of mechanical devices. He was covered with painful, pus-filled boils and possibly suffered from gout. His obesity and other medical problems can be traced to the jousting accident in 1536 in which he suffered a leg wound. The accident reopened and aggravated an injury he had sustained years earlier, to the extent that his doctors found it difficult to treat. The chronic wound festered for the remainder of his life and became ulcerated, preventing him from maintaining the level of physical activity he had previously enjoyed. The jousting accident is also believed to have caused Henry’s mood swings, which may have had a dramatic effect on his personality and temperament.[142][143]

The theory that Henry suffered from syphilis has been dismissed by most historians.[144][145] Historian Susan Maclean Kybett ascribes his demise to scurvy, which is caused by insufficient vitamin C most often due to a lack of fresh fruits and vegetables in one’s diet.[146] Alternatively, his wives’ pattern of pregnancies and his mental deterioration have led some to suggest that he may have been Kell positive and suffered from McLeod syndrome.[143][147] According to another study, Henry’s history and body morphology may have been the result of traumatic brain injury after his 1536 jousting accident, which in turn led to a neuroendocrine cause of his obesity. This analysis identifies growth hormone deficiency (GHD) as the reason for his increased adiposity but also significant behavioural changes noted in his later years, including his multiple marriages.[148]

Henry’s obesity hastened his death at the age of 55, on 28 January 1547 in the Palace of Whitehall, on what would have been his father’s 90th birthday. The tomb he had planned (with components taken from the tomb intended for Cardinal Wolsey) was only partly constructed and was never completed. (The sarcophagus and its base were later removed and used for Lord Nelson‘s tomb in the crypt of St. Paul’s Cathedral.)[149] Henry was interred in a vault at St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle, next to Jane Seymour.[150] Over 100 years later, King Charles I (1625–1649) was buried in the same vault.[151]

Wives, mistresses, and children

See also: Wives of Henry VIIIChildren of Henry VIII, and Mistresses of Henry VIII

English historian and House of Tudor expert David Starkey describes Henry VIII as a husband:

What is extraordinary is that Henry was usually a very good husband. And he liked women—that’s why he married so many of them! He was very tender to them, we know that he addressed them as “sweetheart.” He was a good lover, he was very generous: the wives were given huge settlements of land and jewels—they were loaded with jewels. He was immensely considerate when they were pregnant. But, once he had fallen out of love… he just cut them off. He just withdrew. He abandoned them. They didn’t even know he’d left them.[3]

By Catherine of Aragon (married Palace of Placentia 11 June 1509; annulled 23 May 1533)
Unnamed daughter31 January 1510stillborn
Henry, Duke of Cornwall1 January 151122 February 1511died aged almost two months
Unnamed son17 September 1513died shortly after birth
Unnamed sonNovember 1514[152]died shortly after birth
Queen Mary I18 February 151617 November 1558married Philip II of Spain in 1554; no issue
Unnamed daughter10 November 1518stillborn in the 8th month of pregnancy[153] or lived at least one week
By Elizabeth Blount (mistress; bore the only illegitimate child Henry VIII acknowledged as his son)
Henry FitzRoy, 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset15 June 151923 July 1536illegitimate; acknowledged by Henry VIII in 1525; no issue
By Anne Boleyn (married Westminster Abbey 25 January 1533; annulled 17 May 1536) beheaded on 19 May 1536
Queen Elizabeth I7 September 153324 March 1603never married; no issue
Unnamed sonChristmas, 1534miscarriage or false pregnancy[154]
Unnamed son1535Miscarried son[155]
Unnamed son29 January 1536miscarriage of a child, believed male, in the fourth month of pregnancy[156][157]
By Jane Seymour (married Palace of Whitehall 30 May 1536) died 24 October 1537
King Edward VI12 October 15376 July 1553died unmarried, age 15; no issue
By Anne of Cleves (married Palace of Placentia 6 January 1540; annulled 9 July 1540)
no issue
By Catherine Howard (married Oatlands Palace 28 July 1540; annulled 23 November 1541) beheaded on 13 February 1542
no issue
By Catherine Parr (married Hampton Court Palace 12 July 1543; Henry VIII died 28 January 1547)
no issue


See also: Third Succession Act

Upon Henry’s death, he was succeeded by his son Edward VI. Since Edward was then only nine years old, he could not rule directly. Instead, Henry’s will designated 16 executors to serve on a council of regency until Edward reached 18. The executors chose Edward Seymour, 1st Earl of Hertford, Jane Seymour’s elder brother, to be Lord Protector of the Realm. If Edward died childless, the throne was to pass to Mary, Henry VIII’s daughter by Catherine of Aragon, and her heirs. If Mary’s issue failed, the crown was to go to Elizabeth, Henry’s daughter by Anne Boleyn, and her heirs. Finally, if Elizabeth’s line became extinct, the crown was to be inherited by the descendants of Henry VIII’s deceased younger sister, Mary, the Greys. The descendants of Henry’s sister Margaret—the Stuarts, rulers of Scotland—were thereby excluded from the succession.[158] This provision ultimately failed when James VI of Scotland became King of England in 1603.

Public image

Musical score of “Pastime with Good Company“, c. 1513, composed by Henry

Henry cultivated the image of a Renaissance man, and his court was a centre of scholarly and artistic innovation and glamorous excess, epitomised by the Field of the Cloth of Gold. He scouted the country for choirboys, taking some directly from Wolsey’s choir, and introduced Renaissance music into court. Musicians included Benedict de Opitiis, Richard SampsonAmbrose Lupo, and Venetian organist Dionisio Memo,[159] and Henry himself kept a considerable collection of instruments. He was skilled on the lute and played the organ, and was a talented player of the virginals.[159] He could also sightread music and sing well.[159] He was an accomplished musician, author, and poet; his best-known piece of music is “Pastime with Good Company” (“The Kynges Ballade”), and he is reputed to have written “Greensleeves” but probably did not.[160]

Henry was an avid gambler and dice player, and excelled at sports, especially jousting, hunting, and real tennis. He was also known for his strong defence of conventional Christian piety.[6] He was involved in the construction and improvement of several significant buildings, including Nonsuch PalaceKing’s College Chapel, Cambridge, and Westminster Abbey in London. Many of the existing buildings which he improved were properties confiscated from Wolsey, such as Christ Church, OxfordHampton Court Palace, the Palace of Whitehall, and Trinity College, Cambridge.

Henry was an intellectual, the first English king with a modern humanist education. He read and wrote English, French, and Latin, and owned a large library. He annotated many books and published one of his own, and he had numerous pamphlets and lectures prepared to support the reformation of the church. Richard Sampson’s Oratio (1534), for example, was an argument for absolute obedience to the monarchy and claimed that the English church had always been independent of Rome.[161] At the popular level, theatre and minstrel troupes funded by the crown travelled around the land to promote the new religious practices; the pope and Catholic priests and monks were mocked as foreign devils, while the glorious king was hailed as a brave and heroic defender of the true faith.[162] Henry worked hard to present an image of unchallengeable authority and irresistible power.[163]Catherine of Aragon watching Henry jousting in her honour after giving birth to a son

Henry was a large, well-built athlete, over 6 feet [1.8 m] tall, strong, and broad in proportion. His athletic activities were more than pastimes; they were political devices that served multiple goals, enhancing his image, impressing foreign emissaries and rulers, and conveying his ability to suppress any rebellion. He arranged a jousting tournament at Greenwich in 1517 where he wore gilded armour and gilded horse trappings, and outfits of velvet, satin, and cloth of gold with pearls and jewels. It suitably impressed foreign ambassadors, one of whom wrote home that “the wealth and civilisation of the world are here, and those who call the English barbarians appear to me to render themselves such”.[164] Henry finally retired from jousting in 1536 after a heavy fall from his horse left him unconscious for two hours, but he continued to sponsor two lavish tournaments a year. He then started gaining weight and lost the trim, athletic figure that had made him so handsome, and his courtiers began dressing in heavily padded clothes to emulate and flatter him. His health rapidly declined near the end of his reign.[165][166][167]


The power of Tudor monarchs, including Henry, was ‘whole’ and ‘entire’, ruling, as they claimed, by the grace of God alone.[168] The crown could also rely on the exclusive use of those functions that constituted the royal prerogative. These included acts of diplomacy (including royal marriages), declarations of war, management of the coinage, the issue of royal pardons and the power to summon and dissolve parliament as and when required.[169] Nevertheless, as evident during Henry’s break with Rome, the monarch stayed within established limits, whether legal or financial, that forced him to work closely with both the nobility and parliament (representing the gentry).[169]Cardinal Thomas Wolsey

In practice, Tudor monarchs used patronage to maintain a royal court that included formal institutions such as the Privy Council as well as more informal advisers and confidants.[170] Both the rise and fall of court nobles could be swift: Henry did undoubtedly execute at will, burning or beheading two of his wives, 20 peers, four leading public servants, six close attendants and friends, one cardinal (John Fisher) and numerous abbots.[163] Among those who were in favour at any given point in Henry’s reign, one could usually be identified as a chief minister,[170] though one of the enduring debates in the historiography of the period has been the extent to which those chief ministers controlled Henry rather than vice versa.[171] In particular, historian G. R. Elton has argued that one such minister, Thomas Cromwell, led a “Tudor revolution in government” independently of the king, whom Elton presented as an opportunistic, essentially lazy participant in the nitty-gritty of politics. Where Henry did intervene personally in the running of the country, Elton argued, he mostly did so to its detriment.[172] The prominence and influence of faction in Henry’s court is similarly discussed in the context of at least five episodes of Henry’s reign, including the downfall of Anne Boleyn.[173]

From 1514 to 1529, Thomas Wolsey (1473–1530), a cardinal of the established Church, oversaw domestic and foreign policy for the king from his position as Lord Chancellor.[174] Wolsey centralised the national government and extended the jurisdiction of the conciliar courts, particularly the Star Chamber. The Star Chamber’s overall structure remained unchanged, but Wolsey used it to provide much-needed reform of the criminal law. The power of the court itself did not outlive Wolsey, however, since no serious administrative reform was undertaken and its role eventually devolved to the localities.[175] Wolsey helped fill the gap left by Henry’s declining participation in government (particularly in comparison to his father) but did so mostly by imposing himself in the king’s place.[176] His use of these courts to pursue personal grievances, and particularly to treat delinquents as mere examples of a whole class worthy of punishment, angered the rich, who were annoyed as well by his enormous wealth and ostentatious living.[177] Following Wolsey’s downfall, Henry took full control of his government, although at court numerous complex factions continued to try to ruin and destroy each other.[178]Thomas Cromwell in 1532 or 1533

Thomas Cromwell (c. 1485–1540) also came to define Henry’s government. Returning to England from the continent in 1514 or 1515, Cromwell soon entered Wolsey’s service. He turned to law, also picking up a good knowledge of the Bible, and was admitted to Gray’s Inn in 1524. He became Wolsey’s “man of all work”.[179] Driven in part by his religious beliefs, Cromwell attempted to reform the body politic of the English government through discussion and consent, and through the vehicle of continuity, not outward change.[180] Many saw him as the man they wanted to bring about their shared aims, including Thomas Audley. By 1531, Cromwell and his associates were already responsible for the drafting of much legislation.[180] Cromwell’s first office was that of the master of the king’s jewels in 1532, from which he began to invigorate the government finances.[181] By that point, Cromwell’s power as an efficient administrator, in a Council full of politicians, exceeded what Wolsey had achieved.[182]

Cromwell did much work through his many offices to remove the tasks of government from the Royal Household (and ideologically from the personal body of the King) and into a public state.[182] But he did so in a haphazard fashion that left several remnants, not least because he needed to retain Henry’s support, his own power, and the possibility of actually achieving the plan he set out.[183] Cromwell made the various income streams Henry VII put in place more formal and assigned largely autonomous bodies for their administration.[184] The role of the King’s Council was transferred to a reformed Privy Council, much smaller and more efficient than its predecessor.[185] A difference emerged between the king’s financial health and the country’s, although Cromwell’s fall undermined much of his bureaucracy, which required him to keep order among the many new bodies and prevent profligate spending that strained relations as well as finances.[186] Cromwell’s reforms ground to a halt in 1539, the initiative lost, and he failed to secure the passage of an enabling act, the Proclamation by the Crown Act 1539.[187] He was executed on 28 July 1540.[188]


Gold crown of Henry VIII, minted c. 1544–1547. The reverse depicts the quartered arms of England and France.

Henry inherited a vast fortune and a prosperous economy from his father, who had been frugal. This fortune is estimated at £1,250,000 (the equivalent of £375 million today).[189] By comparison, Henry’s reign was a near disaster financially. He augmented the royal treasury by seizing church lands, but his heavy spending and long periods of mismanagement damaged the economy.[190]

Henry spent much of his wealth on maintaining his court and household, including many of the building works he undertook on royal palaces. He hung 2,000 tapestries in his palaces; by comparison, James V of Scotland hung just 200.[191] Henry took pride in showing off his collection of weapons, which included exotic archery equipment, 2,250 pieces of land ordnance and 6,500 handguns.[192] Tudor monarchs had to fund all government expenses out of their own income. This income came from the Crown lands that Henry owned as well as from customs duties like tonnage and poundage, granted by parliament to the king for life. During Henry’s reign the revenues of the Crown remained constant (around £100,000),[193] but were eroded by inflation and rising prices brought about by war. Indeed, war and Henry’s dynastic ambitions in Europe exhausted the surplus he had inherited from his father by the mid-1520s.

Henry VII had not involved Parliament in his affairs very much, but Henry VIII had to turn to Parliament during his reign for money, in particular for grants of subsidies to fund his wars. The dissolution of the monasteries provided a means to replenish the treasury, and as a result, the Crown took possession of monastic lands worth £120,000 (£36 million) a year.[194] The Crown had profited by a small amount in 1526 when Wolsey put England onto a gold, rather than silver, standard, and had debased the currency slightly. Cromwell debased the currency more significantly, starting in Ireland in 1540. The English pound halved in value against the Flemish pound between 1540 and 1551 as a result. The nominal profit made was significant, helping to bring income and expenditure together, but it had a catastrophic effect on the country’s economy. In part, it helped to bring about a period of very high inflation from 1544 onwards.[195]


Main article: English ReformationKing Henry VIII sitting with his feet upon Pope Clement VI, 1641

Henry is generally credited with initiating the English Reformation—the process of transforming England from a Catholic country to a Protestant one—though his progress at the elite and mass levels is disputed,[196] and the precise narrative not widely agreed upon.[62] Certainly, in 1527, Henry, until then an observant and well-informed Catholic, appealed to the Pope for an annulment of his marriage to Catherine.[62] No annulment was immediately forthcoming, since the papacy was now under the control of Charles V, Catherine’ s nephew.[197] The traditional narrative gives this refusal as the trigger for Henry’s rejection of papal supremacy, which he had previously defended. Yet as E. L. Woodward put it, Henry’s determination to divorce Catherine was the occasion rather than the cause of the English Reformation so that “neither too much nor too little must be made of this divorce”.[198] Historian A. F. Pollard has argued that even if Henry had not needed an annulment, he might have come to reject papal control over the governance of England purely for political reasons. Indeed, Henry needed a son to secure the Tudor Dynasty and avert the risk of civil war over disputed succession.[199]

In any case, between 1532 and 1537, Henry instituted a number of statutes that dealt with the relationship between king and pope and hence the structure of the nascent Church of England.[200] These included the Statute in Restraint of Appeals (passed 1533), which extended the charge of praemunire against all who introduced papal bulls into England, potentially exposing them to the death penalty if found guilty.[201] Other acts included the Supplication against the Ordinaries and the Submission of the Clergy, which recognised Royal Supremacy over the church. The Ecclesiastical Appointments Act 1534 required the clergy to elect bishops nominated by the Sovereign. The Act of Supremacy in 1534 declared that the king was “the only Supreme Head on Earth of the Church of England” and the Treasons Act 1534 made it high treason, punishable by death, to refuse the Oath of Supremacy acknowledging the king as such. Similarly, following the passage of the Act of Succession 1533, all adults in the kingdom were required to acknowledge the Act’s provisions (declaring Henry’s marriage to Anne legitimate and his marriage to Catherine illegitimate) by oath;[202] those who refused were subject to imprisonment for life, and any publisher or printer of any literature alleging that the marriage to Anne was invalid subject to the death penalty.[203] Finally, the Peter’s Pence Act was passed, and it reiterated that England had “no superior under God, but only your Grace” and that Henry’s “imperial crown” had been diminished by “the unreasonable and uncharitable usurpations and exactions” of the Pope.[204] The king had much support from the Church under Cranmer.[205]A 16th-century depiction of the Parliament of King Henry VIII

To Cromwell’s annoyance, Henry insisted on parliamentary time to discuss questions of faith, which he achieved through the Duke of Norfolk. This led to the passing of the Act of Six Articles, whereby six major questions were all answered by asserting the religious orthodoxy, thus restraining the reform movement in England.[120] It was followed by the beginnings of a reformed liturgy and of the Book of Common Prayer, which would take until 1549 to complete.[206] But this victory for religious conservatives did not convert into much change in personnel, and Cranmer remained in his position.[207] Overall, the rest of Henry’s reign saw a subtle movement away from religious orthodoxy, helped in part by the deaths of prominent figures from before the break with Rome, especially the executions of Thomas More and John Fisher in 1535 for refusing to renounce papal authority. Henry established a new political theology of obedience to the crown that continued for the next decade. It reflected Martin Luther‘s new interpretation of the fourth commandment (“Honour thy father and mother”), brought to England by William Tyndale. The founding of royal authority on the Ten Commandments was another important shift: reformers within the Church used the Commandments’ emphasis on faith and the word of God, while conservatives emphasised the need for dedication to God and doing good. The reformers’ efforts lay behind the publication of the Great Bible in 1539 in English.[208] Protestant Reformers still faced persecution, particularly over objections to Henry’s annulment. Many fled abroad, including the influential Tyndale,[209] who was eventually executed and his body burned at Henry’s behest.

When taxes once payable to Rome were transferred to the Crown, Cromwell saw the need to assess the taxable value of the Church’s extensive holdings as they stood in 1535. The result was an extensive compendium, the Valor Ecclesiasticus.[210] In September 1535, Cromwell commissioned a more general visitation of religious institutions, to be undertaken by four appointee visitors. The visitation focussed almost exclusively on the country’s religious houses, with largely negative conclusions.[211] In addition to reporting back to Cromwell, the visitors made the lives of the monks more difficult by enforcing strict behavioural standards. The result was to encourage self-dissolution.[212] In any case, the evidence Cromwell gathered led swiftly to the beginning of the state-enforced dissolution of the monasteries, with all religious houses worth less than £200 vested by statute in the crown in January 1536.[213] After a short pause, surviving religious houses were transferred one by one to the Crown and new owners, and the dissolution confirmed by a further statute in 1539. By January 1540 no such houses remained; 800 had been dissolved. The process had been efficient, with minimal resistance, and brought the crown some £90,000 a year.[214] The extent to which the dissolution of all houses was planned from the start is debated by historians; there is some evidence that major houses were originally intended only to be reformed.[215] Cromwell’s actions transferred a fifth of England’s landed wealth to new hands. The programme was designed primarily to create a landed gentry beholden to the crown, which would use the lands much more efficiently.[216] Although little opposition to the supremacy could be found in England’s religious houses, they had links to the international church and were an obstacle to further religious reform.[217]

Response to the reforms was mixed. The religious houses had been the only support of the impoverished,[218] and the reforms alienated much of the populace outside London, helping to provoke the great northern rising of 1536–37, known as the Pilgrimage of Grace.[219] Elsewhere the changes were accepted and welcomed, and those who clung to Catholic rites kept quiet or moved in secrecy. They reemerged during the reign of Henry’s daughter Mary (1553–58).


Henry’s Italian-made suit of armour, c. 1544. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Apart from permanent garrisons at Berwick, Calais, and Carlisle, England’s standing army numbered only a few hundred men. This was increased only slightly by Henry.[220] Henry’s invasion force of 1513, some 30,000 men, was composed of billmen and longbowmen, at a time when the other European nations were moving to hand guns and pikemen. But the difference in capability was at this stage not significant, and Henry’s forces had new armour and weaponry. They were also supported by battlefield artillery and the war wagon,[221] relatively new innovations, and several large and expensive siege guns.[222] The invasion force of 1544 was similarly well-equipped and organised, although command on the battlefield was laid with the dukes of Suffolk and Norfolk, which in the latter case produced disastrous results at Montreuil.[138]

Henry’s break with Rome incurred the threat of a large-scale French or Spanish invasion.[86] To guard against this, in 1538 he began to build a chain of expensive, state-of-the-art defences along Britain’s southern and eastern coasts, from Kent to Cornwall, largely built of material gained from the demolition of the monasteries.[223] These were known as Henry VIII’s Device Forts. He also strengthened existing coastal defence fortresses such as Dover Castle and, at Dover, Moat Bulwark and Archcliffe Fort, which he visited for a few months to supervise.[86] Wolsey had many years before conducted the censuses required for an overhaul of the system of militia, but no reform resulted.[224] In 1538–39, Cromwell overhauled the shire musters, but his work mainly served to demonstrate how inadequate they were in organisation.[86] The building works, including that at Berwick, along with the reform of the militias and musters, were eventually finished under Queen Mary.[225]Depiction of Henry embarking at Dover, c. 1520

Henry is traditionally cited as one of the founders of the Royal Navy.[226] Technologically, Henry invested in large cannon for his warships, an idea that had taken hold in other countries, to replace the smaller serpentines in use.[226] He also flirted with designing ships personally. His contribution to larger vessels, if any, is unknown, but it is believed that he influenced the design of rowbarges and similar galleys.[227] Henry was also responsible for the creation of a permanent navy, with the supporting anchorages and dockyards.[226] Tactically, Henry’s reign saw the Navy move away from boarding tactics to employ gunnery instead.[228] The Tudor navy was enlarged up to 50 ships (the Mary Rose among them), and Henry was responsible for the establishment of the “council for marine causes” to oversee the maintenance and operation of the Navy, becoming the basis for the later Admiralty.[229]


The division of Ireland in 1450

At the beginning of Henry’s reign, Ireland was effectively divided into three zones: the Pale, where English rule was unchallenged; Leinster and Munster, the so-called “obedient land” of Anglo-Irish peers; and the Gaelic Connaught and Ulster, with merely nominal English rule.[230] Until 1513, Henry continued the policy of his father, to allow Irish lords to rule in the king’s name and accept steep divisions between the communities.[231] However, upon the death of the 8th Earl of Kildare, governor of Ireland, fractious Irish politics combined with a more ambitious Henry to cause trouble. When Thomas Butler, 7th Earl of Ormond died, Henry recognised one successor for Ormond’s English, Welsh and Scottish lands, whilst in Ireland another took control. Kildare’s successor, the 9th Earl, was replaced as Lord Lieutenant of Ireland by The Earl of Surrey in 1520.[232] Surrey’s ambitious aims were costly but ineffective; English rule became trapped between winning the Irish lords over with diplomacy, as favoured by Henry and Wolsey, and a sweeping military occupation as proposed by Surrey.[233] Surrey was recalled in 1521, with Piers Butler – one of the claimants to the Earldom of Ormond – appointed in his place. Butler proved unable to control opposition, including that of Kildare. Kildare was appointed chief governor in 1524, resuming his dispute with Butler, which had before been in a lull. Meanwhile, the Earl of Desmond, an Anglo-Irish peer, had turned his support to Richard de la Pole as pretender to the English throne; when in 1528 Kildare failed to take suitable actions against him, Kildare was once again removed from his post.[234]

The Desmond situation was resolved on his death in 1529, which was followed by a period of uncertainty. This was effectively ended with the appointment of Henry FitzRoy, Duke of Richmond and the king’s son, as lord lieutenant. Richmond had never before visited Ireland, his appointment a break with past policy.[235][236] For a time it looked as if peace might be restored with the return of Kildare to Ireland to manage the tribes, but the effect was limited and the Irish parliament soon rendered ineffective.[237] Ireland began to receive the attention of Cromwell, who had supporters of Ormond and Desmond promoted. Kildare, on the other hand, was summoned to London; after some hesitation, he departed for London in 1534, where he would face charges of treason.[237] His son, Thomas, Lord Offaly was more forthright, denouncing the king and leading a “Catholic crusade” against the king, who was by this time mired in marital problems. Offaly had the Archbishop of Dublin murdered and besieged Dublin. Offaly led a mixture of Pale gentry and Irish tribes, although he failed to secure the support of Lord Darcy, a sympathiser, or Charles V. What was effectively a civil war was ended with the intervention of 2,000 English troops – a large army by Irish standards – and the execution of Offaly (his father was already dead) and his uncles.[238][239]

Although the Offaly revolt was followed by a determination to rule Ireland more closely, Henry was wary of drawn-out conflict with the tribes, and a royal commission recommended that the only relationship with the tribes was to be promises of peace, their land protected from English expansion. The man to lead this effort was Sir Antony St Leger, as Lord Deputy of Ireland, who would remain into the post past Henry’s death.[240] Until the break with Rome, it was widely believed that Ireland was a Papal possession granted as a mere fiefdom to the English king, so in 1541 Henry asserted England’s claim to the Kingdom of Ireland free from the Papal overlordship. This change did, however, also allow a policy of peaceful reconciliation and expansion: the Lords of Ireland would grant their lands to the King, before being returned as fiefdoms. The incentive to comply with Henry’s request was an accompanying barony, and thus a right to sit in the Irish House of Lords, which was to run in parallel with England’s.[241] The Irish law of the tribes did not suit such an arrangement, because the chieftain did not have the required rights; this made progress tortuous, and the plan was abandoned in 1543, not to be replaced.[242]


The complexities and sheer scale of Henry’s legacy ensured that, in the words of Betteridge and Freeman, “throughout the centuries, Henry has been praised and reviled, but he has never been ignored”.[171] Historian J.D. Mackie sums up Henry’s personality and its impact on his achievements and popularity:

The respect, nay even the popularity, which he had from his people was not unmerited….He kept the development of England in line with some of the most vigorous, though not the noblest forces of the day. His high courage – highest when things went ill – his commanding intellect, his appreciation of fact, and his instinct for rule carried his country through a perilous time of change, and his very arrogance saved his people from the wars which afflicted other lands. Dimly remembering the wars of the Roses, vaguely informed as to the slaughters and sufferings in Europe, the people of England knew that in Henry they had a great king.[243]

A particular focus of modern historiography has been the extent to which the events of Henry’s life (including his marriages, foreign policy and religious changes) were the result of his own initiative and, if they were, whether they were the result of opportunism or of a principled undertaking by Henry.[171] The traditional interpretation of those events was provided by historian A.F. Pollard, who in 1902 presented his own, largely positive, view of the king, lauding him, “as the king and statesman who, whatever his personal failings, led England down the road to parliamentary democracy and empire”.[171] Pollard’s interpretation remained the dominant interpretation of Henry’s life until the publication of the doctoral thesis of G. R. Elton in 1953.

Elton’s book on The Tudor Revolution in Government, maintained Pollard’s positive interpretation of the Henrician period as a whole, but reinterpreted Henry himself as a follower rather than a leader. For Elton, it was Cromwell and not Henry who undertook the changes in government – Henry was shrewd but lacked the vision to follow a complex plan through.[171] Henry was little more, in other words, than an “ego-centric monstrosity” whose reign “owed its successes and virtues to better and greater men about him; most of its horrors and failures sprang more directly from [the king]”.[244]

Although the central tenets of Elton’s thesis have since been questioned, it has consistently provided the starting point for much later work, including that of J. J. Scarisbrick, his student. Scarisbrick largely kept Elton’s regard for Cromwell’s abilities but returned agency to Henry, who Scarisbrick considered to have ultimately directed and shaped policy.[171] For Scarisbrick, Henry was a formidable, captivating man who “wore regality with a splendid conviction”.[245] The effect of endowing Henry with this ability, however, was largely negative in Scarisbrick’s eyes: to Scarisbrick, the Henrician period was one of upheaval and destruction and those in charge worthy of blame more than praise.[171] Even among more recent biographers, including David LoadesDavid Starkey and John Guy, there has ultimately been little consensus on the extent to which Henry was responsible for the changes he oversaw or the assessment of those he did bring about.[171]

This lack of clarity about Henry’s control over events has contributed to the variation in the qualities ascribed to him: religious conservative or dangerous radical; lover of beauty or brutal destroyer of priceless artefacts; friend and patron or betrayer of those around him; chivalry incarnate or ruthless chauvinist.[171] One traditional approach, favoured by Starkey and others, is to divide Henry’s reign into two halves, the first Henry being dominated by positive qualities (politically inclusive, pious, athletic but also intellectual) who presided over a period of stability and calm, and the latter a “hulking tyrant” who presided over a period of dramatic, sometimes whimsical, change.[170][246] Other writers have tried to merge Henry’s disparate personality into a single whole; Lacey Baldwin Smith, for example, considered him an egotistical borderline neurotic given to great fits of temper and deep and dangerous suspicions, with a mechanical and conventional, but deeply held piety, and having at best a mediocre intellect.[247]

Style and arms

Henry’s armorial during his early reign (left) and later reign (right)

Many changes were made to the royal style during his reign. Henry originally used the style “Henry the Eighth, by the Grace of God, King of EnglandFrance and Lord of Ireland“. In 1521, pursuant to a grant from Pope Leo X rewarding Henry for his Defence of the Seven Sacraments, the royal style became “Henry the Eighth, by the Grace of God, King of England and France, Defender of the Faith and Lord of Ireland”. Following Henry’s excommunication, Pope Paul III rescinded the grant of the title “Defender of the Faith”, but an Act of Parliament (35 Hen 8 c 3) declared that it remained valid; and it continues in royal usage to the present day, as evidenced by the letters FID DEF or F.D. on all British coinage. Henry’s motto was “Coeur Loyal” (“true heart”), and he had this embroidered on his clothes in the form of a heart symbol and with the word “loyal”. His emblem was the Tudor rose and the Beaufort portcullis. As king, Henry’s arms were the same as those used by his predecessors since Henry IVQuarterly, Azure three fleurs-de-lys Or (for France) and Gules three lions passant guardant in pale Or (for England).

In 1535, Henry added the “supremacy phrase” to the royal style, which became “Henry the Eighth, by the Grace of God, King of England and France, Defender of the Faith, Lord of Ireland and of the Church of England in Earth Supreme Head”. In 1536, the phrase “of the Church of England” changed to “of the Church of England and also of Ireland“. In 1541, Henry had the Irish Parliament change the title “Lord of Ireland” to “King of Ireland” with the Crown of Ireland Act 1542, after being advised that many Irish people regarded the Pope as the true head of their country, with the Lord acting as a mere representative. The reason the Irish regarded the Pope as their overlord was that Ireland had originally been given to King Henry II of England by Pope Adrian IV in the 12th century as a feudal territory under papal overlordship. The meeting of the Irish Parliament that proclaimed Henry VIII as King of Ireland was the first meeting attended by the Gaelic Irish chieftains as well as the Anglo-Irish aristocrats. The style “Henry the Eighth, by the Grace of God, King of England, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith and of the Church of England and also of Ireland in Earth Supreme Head” remained in use until the end of Henry’s reign.


showAncestors of Henry VIII[248]

See also

Grene growith the holy (0:31)MENU0:00A Christmas carol attributed to Henry VIII
Problems playing this file? See media help.


  1. ^ For arguments in favour of the contrasting view – i.e. that Henry himself initiated the period of abstinence, potentially after a brief affair – see Bernard, G. W. (2010). Anne Boleyn: Fatal Attractions. Yale University Press..[59]
  2. ^ “And if a man shall take his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing: he hath uncovered his brother’s nakedness; they shall be childless.”
  3. ^ On 11 July 1533 Pope Clement VII ‘pronounced sentence against the King, declaring him excommunicated unless he put away the woman he had taken to wife, and took back his Queen during the whole of October next.’[83] Clement died on 25 September 1534. On 30 August 1535 the new pope, Paul III, drew up a bull of excommunication which began ‘Eius qui immobilis’.[84][85] G. R. Elton puts the date the bull was made official as November 1538.[86] On 17 December 1538 Pope Paul III issued a further bull which began ‘Cum redemptor noster’, renewing the execution of the bull of 30 August 1535, which had been suspended in hope of his amendment.[87][88] Both bulls are printed by Bishop Burnet, History of the Reformation of the Church of England, 1865 edition, Volume 4, P 318ff and in Bullarum, diplomatum et privilegiorum sanctorum Romanorum pontificum Taurinensis (1857) Volume VI, Page 195


  1. ^ J.J. Scarisbrick, Henry VIII (1968) pp. 500–1.
  2. ^ Guy 2000, p. 41.
  3. Jump up to:a b c “The Six Wives of Henry VIII. About the Series. Behind the Scenes | PBS”www.thirteen.org. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
  4. ^ Ives 2006, pp. 28–36; Montefiore 2008, p. 129
  5. Jump up to:a b Crofton 2006, p. 128
  6. Jump up to:a b Crofton 2006, p. 129
  7. Jump up to:a b c Scarisbrick 1997, p. 3
  8. ^ Churchill 1966, p. 24
  9. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 14–15
  10. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 4
  11. ^ Gibbs, Vicary, ed. (1912). The Complete Peerage, Volume III. St Catherine’s Press. p. 443.Under Duke of Cornwall, which was his title when he succeeded his brother as Prince of Wales.
  12. ^ Maloney 2015, p. 96
  13. Jump up to:a b Crofton 2006, p. 126
  14. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 4–5
  15. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 6
  16. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, p. 22
  17. Jump up to:a b c Scarisbrick 1997, p. 8
  18. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 22–23.
  19. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, p. 23
  20. Jump up to:a b c Loades 2009, p. 24
  21. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 12
  22. Jump up to:a b Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 18–19
  23. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 19
  24. ^ Hall 1904, p. 17
  25. ^ Starkey 2008, pp. 304–306
  26. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 31–32
  27. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, p. 26
  28. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 18
  29. Jump up to:a b c d Loades 2009, pp. 48–49
  30. ^ Elton 1977, p. 103
  31. ^ Hart 2009, p. 27
  32. Jump up to:a b Fraser 1994, p. 220
  33. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, pp. 47–48
  34. ^ Weir 1991, pp. 122–3
  35. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 98, 104
  36. ^ Elton 1977, p. 255
  37. ^ Elton 1977, p. 255, 271
  38. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, p. 27
  39. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 27–28
  40. Jump up to:a b Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 28–31
  41. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 30–32
  42. ^ Loades 2009, p. 62
  43. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 33–34
  44. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 62–63
  45. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 35–36
  46. ^ Guicciardini 1968, p. 280
  47. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, p. 63
  48. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 65–66
  49. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 66–67
  50. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 67–68
  51. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, pp. 68–69
  52. ^ Loades 2009, p. 69
  53. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 70–71
  54. ^ Cruz & Suzuki 2009, p. 132
  55. ^ Smith 1971, p. 70
  56. ^ Crofton 2006, p. 51
  57. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 154
  58. ^ Weir 2002, p. 160
  59. Jump up to:a b c Gunn, Steven. “Anne Boleyn: Fatal Attractions (review)”. Reviews in History. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  60. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 88–89
  61. ^ Brigden 2000, p. 114
  62. Jump up to:a b c d Elton 1977, pp. 103–107
  63. Jump up to:a b Elton 1977, pp. 75–76
  64. ^ Phillips, Roderick (1991). Untying the Knot: A Short History of Divorce. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521423700.
  65. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 91–92
  66. Jump up to:a b c d e Elton 1977, pp. 109–111
  67. ^ Lockyer, Roger (22 May 2014). Tudor and Stuart Britain: 1485–1714. Routledge. p. 46. ISBN 978-1-317-86882-8. Retrieved 13 July 2014. The King had no further use for Wolsey, who had failed to procure the annulment of his marriage, and he summoned Parliament in order that an act of attainder should be passed against the cardinal. The act was not needed, however, for Wolsey had also been commanded to appear before the common-law judges and answer the charge that by publishing his bulls of appointment as papal legate he had infringed the Statute of Praemunire.
  68. ^ Haigh 1993, p. 92f
  69. ^ Elton 1977, p. 116
  70. Jump up to:a b Losch, Richard R. (1 May 2002). The Many Faces of Faith: A Guide to World Religions and Christian Traditions. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 106. ISBN 978-0-8028-0521-8Henry decided to turn to the archbishop of Canterbury for the annulment, but Wolsey, recognizing that it was too late, opposed this move. Henry discharged him and appointed his friend Sir Thomas More as chancellor, confident that More would support him. More refused to make any statement for or against the annulment. When pressed to do so he resigned as the chancellor and retired to private life. He had such a reputation for integrity that his endorsement would have engendered huge support for the annulment among Parliament and the people, who loved Catherine. More’s silence so angered Henry that he tried to force his hand by having him imprisoned and tried. The perfidy of the king’s secretary, Thomas Cromwell, however, and the perjury of a petty bureaucrat, Richard Rich, brought about More’s conviction and execution for treason in 1535. Meanwhile, a respected Cambridge scholar priest, Tomas Cranmer, supported Henry and sought support for him from the European universities.
  71. ^ Elton 1977, p. 123
  72. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 175–176
  73. ^ Williams 1971, p. 123
  74. ^ Starkey 2003, pp. 462–464
  75. ^ Williams 1971, p. 124
  76. ^ Elton 1977, p. 178
  77. ^ Williams 1971, pp. 128–131
  78. ^ Bernard 2005, pp. 68–71
  79. ^ Bernard 2005, p. 68
  80. ^ Williams 1971, p. 136
  81. ^ Bernard 2005, p. 69
  82. ^ Bernard 2005, pp. 69–71
  83. ^ James Gairdner, ed. (1882). Henry VIII: AppendixLetters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 6: 1533. Institute of Historical Research. Retrieved 9 November 2014.
  84. ^ Churchill 1966, p. 51
  85. ^ James Gairdner, ed. (1886). Henry VIII: August 1535, 26–31Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 9: August–December 1535. Institute of Historical Research. Retrieved 9 November 2014.
  86. Jump up to:a b c d Elton 1977, p. 282
  87. Jump up to:a b Scarisbrick 1997, p. 361
  88. ^ James Gairdner, ed. (1893). Henry VIII: December 1538 16–20Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 13 Part 2: August–December 1538. Institute of Historical Research. Retrieved 9 November 2014.
  89. ^ Williams 1971, p. 138
  90. Jump up to:a b Elton 1977, pp. 192–4
  91. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 262–3
  92. ^ Elton 1977, p. 260
  93. ^ Elton 1977, p. 261
  94. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 261–2
  95. ^ Elton 1977, p. 262
  96. ^ Licence, Amy (2017). “Dark Days”Catherine of Aragon: An Intimate Life of Henry VIII’s True WifeAmberley PublishingISBN 978-1445656700.
  97. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 348
  98. ^ Williams 1971, p. 141
  99. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 250–251
  100. ^ Wilson, Derek (21 June 2012). A Brief History of the English Reformation. Constable & Robinson. p. 92. ISBN 978-1-84901-825-8. Retrieved 13 July 2014. Cromwell, with his usual single-minded (and ruthless) efficiency, organised the interrogation of the accused, their trials and their executions. Cranmer was absolutely shattered by the ‘revelation’ of the queen’s misdeeds. He wrote to the king expressing his difficulty in believing her guilt. But he fell into line and pronounced the annulment of Henry’s second marriage on the grounds of Anne’s pre-contract to another.
  101. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 252–253
  102. ^ Williams 1971, p. 142
  103. ^ Ives 2005, p. 306
  104. ^ Elton 1977, p. 253
  105. ^ Hibbert et al. 2010, p. 60
  106. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 350
  107. ^ Weir 2002, p. 344.
  108. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 353
  109. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 355
  110. ^ Elton 1977, p. 275
  111. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 355–256
  112. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 350–351
  113. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 72–73
  114. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 74–75
  115. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 368–369
  116. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 369–370
  117. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 373–374
  118. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 373–375
  119. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 370
  120. Jump up to:a b Elton 1977, p. 289
  121. Jump up to:a b c Scarisbrick 1997, p. 373
  122. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 372–3
  123. Jump up to:a b Elton 1977, pp. 289–291
  124. Jump up to:a b Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 376–7
  125. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 378–9
  126. ^ Elton 1977, p. 290
  127. ^ Farquhar 2001, p. 75
  128. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 430
  129. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 430–431
  130. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 431–432
  131. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 432–433
  132. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 456
  133. ^ Elton 1977, p. 301
  134. ^ Scarisbrick 1997, p. 457
  135. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 331, 373
  136. ^ Loades 2009, p. 75
  137. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 75–76
  138. Jump up to:a b c Elton 1977, pp. 306–307
  139. Jump up to:a b c Loades 2009, pp. 79–80
  140. ^ Neil Murphy, “Violence, Colonization and Henry VIII’s Conquest of France, 1544–1546.” Past and Present 233#1 (2016): 13–51.
  141. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 76–77
  142. ^ “The jousting accident that turned Henry VIII into a tyrant”The Independent. UK. 18 April 2009. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
  143. Jump up to:a b Sohn, Emily (11 March 2011). “King Henry VIII’s Madness Explained”. discovery.com. Retrieved 25 March2011.
  144. ^ Hays 2010, p. 68
  145. ^ Russell, Gareth (2016). Young and Damned and Fair. p. 130.
  146. ^ “Names in the News: Henry VIII Termed Victim of Scurvy”Los Angeles Times. 30 August 1989.
  147. ^ Whitley & Kramer 2010, p. passim
  148. ^ Ashrafian 2011, p. passim
  149. ^ The Archaeological Journal, Volume 51. 1894. p. 160.
  150. ^ Loades 2009, p. 207
  151. ^ Dean and Canons of Windsor. “Henry VIII’s final resting place” (PDF). Windsor Castle: College of St George. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 May 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  152. ^ According to Sir John Dewhurst in The alleged miscarriages of Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn: 1984, page 52, the Venetian ambassador wrote to his senate in November that “The Queen has been delivered of a stillborn male child of eight months to the very great grief of the whole court”, Holinshed, the chronicler, ” reported that “in November the Queen was delivered of a prince which lived not long after”, and John Stow wrote “in the meantime, to Whit, the month of November, the Q was delivered of a prince which lived not long after”.
  153. ^ Starkey 2003, p. 160
  154. ^ Eustace Chapuys wrote to Charles V on 28 January reporting that Anne was pregnant. A letter from George Taylor to Lady Lisle dated the 27 April 1534 says that “The Queen hath a goodly belly, praying our Lord to send us a prince”. In July, Anne’s brother, Lord Rochford, was sent on a diplomatic mission to France to ask for the postponement of a meeting between Henry VIII and Francis I because of Anne’s condition: “being so far gone with child she could not cross the sea with the King”. Chapuys backs this up in a letter dated 27 July, where he refers to Anne’s pregnancy. We do not know what happened with this pregnancy as there is no evidence of the outcome. Dewhurst writes of how the pregnancy could have resulted in a miscarriage or stillbirth, but there is no evidence to support this, he therefore wonders if it was a case of pseudocyesis, a false pregnancy, caused by the stress that Anne was under – the pressure to provide a son. Chapuys wrote on 27 September 1534 “Since the King began to doubt whether his lady was enceinte or not, he has renewed and increased the love he formerly had for a beautiful damsel of the court”. Muriel St Clair Byrne, editor of the Lisle Letters, believes that this was a false pregnancy too.
  155. ^ The only evidence for a miscarriage in 1535 is a sentence from a letter from Sir William Kingston to Lord Lisle on 24 June 1535 when Kingston says “Her Grace has as fair a belly as I have ever seen”. However, Dewhurst thinks that there is an error in the dating of this letter as the editor of the Lisle Letters states that this letter is actually from 1533 or 1534 because it also refers to Sir Christopher Garneys, a man who died in October 1534.
  156. ^ Starkey 2003, p. 553
  157. ^ Chapuys reported to Charles V on 10 February 1536 that Anne Boleyn had miscarried on the day of Catherine of Aragon’s funeral: “On the day of the interment [of Catherine of Aragon] the concubine [Anne] had an abortion which seemed to be a male child which she had not borne 3 1/2 months”.
  158. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 332–333
  159. Jump up to:a b c Scarisbrick 1997, pp. 15–16
  160. ^ Alison WeirHenry VIII: The King and His Court (New York: Ballantine Books, 2002): 131. ISBN 0-345-43708-X.
  161. ^ Chibi 1997, pp. 543–560
  162. ^ Betteridge 2005, pp. 91–109
  163. Jump up to:a b Hibbert et al. 2010, p. 928
  164. ^ Hutchinson 2012, p. 202
  165. ^ Gunn 1991, pp. 543–560
  166. ^ Williams 2005, pp. 41–59
  167. ^ Lipscomb 2009
  168. ^ Guy 1997, p. 78
  169. Jump up to:a b Morris 1999, p. 2
  170. Jump up to:a b c Morris 1999, pp. 19–21
  171. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Betteridge & Freeman 2012, pp. 1–19
  172. ^ Elton 1977, p. 323
  173. ^ Elton 1977, p. 407
  174. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 48–49
  175. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 60–63
  176. ^ Elton 1977, p. 212
  177. ^ Elton 1977, p. 64
  178. ^ Derek Wilson (2003). In the Lion’s Court: Power, Ambition, and Sudden Death in the Reign of Henry VIII. Macmillan. pp. 257–60. ISBN 978-0-312-30277-1.
  179. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 168–170
  180. Jump up to:a b Elton 1977, p. 172
  181. ^ Elton 1977, p. 174
  182. Jump up to:a b Elton 1977, p. 213
  183. ^ Elton 1977, p. 214
  184. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 214–215
  185. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 216–217
  186. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 215–216
  187. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 284–286
  188. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 289–292
  189. ^ Weir 2002, p. 13
  190. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 215–216, 355–6
  191. ^ Thomas 2005, pp. 79–80 citing Thurley 1993, pp. 222–224
  192. ^ Davies 2005, pp. 11–29
  193. ^ Weir 2002, p. 64
  194. ^ Weir 2002, p. 393
  195. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 312–314
  196. ^ “Competing Narratives: Recent Historiography of the English Reformation under Henry VIII”. 1997. Archived from the original on 15 June 2013. Retrieved 14 April 2013.
  197. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 110–112
  198. ^ Woodward, Llewellyn (1965). A History Of England. London: Methuen & Co Ltd. p. 73.
  199. ^ Pollard 1905, pp. 230–238
  200. ^ Bernard 2005, p. missing
  201. ^ Bernard 2005, p. 71
  202. ^ Elton 1977, p. 185
  203. ^ Bernard 2005, pp. 70–71
  204. ^ Lehmberg 1970, p. missing
  205. ^ Bernard 2005, p. 195
  206. ^ Elton 1977, p. 291
  207. ^ Elton 1977, p. 297
  208. ^ Rex 1996, pp. 863–894
  209. ^ Elton 1977, p. 3177
  210. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 232–233
  211. ^ Elton 1977, p. 233
  212. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 233–234
  213. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 234–235
  214. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 235–236
  215. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 236–237
  216. ^ Stöber 2007, p. 190
  217. ^ Elton 1977, p. 238
  218. ^ Meyer 2010, pp. 254–256
  219. ^ Meyer 2010, pp. 269–272
  220. ^ Elton 1977, p. 32
  221. ^ Arnold 2001, p. 82
  222. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 32–33
  223. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 183, 281–283
  224. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 87–88
  225. ^ Elton 1977, p. 391
  226. Jump up to:a b c Loades 2009, p. 82
  227. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 82–83
  228. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 83–84
  229. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 84–85
  230. ^ Loades 2009, p. 180
  231. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 181–182
  232. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 183–184
  233. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 181–185
  234. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 185–186
  235. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 186–187
  236. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 206–207
  237. Jump up to:a b Loades 2009, p. 187
  238. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 187–189
  239. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 207–208
  240. ^ Loades 2009, p. 191
  241. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 191–192
  242. ^ Loades 2009, pp. 194–195
  243. ^ J.D. Mackie (1952). The Earlier Tudors, 1485–1558. pp. 44–43. ISBN 9780198217060.
  244. ^ Elton 1977, pp. 23,332
  245. ^ Scarisbrick 1968, p. 17
  246. ^ Starkey 2008, pp. 3–4
  247. ^ Smith 1971, p. passim
  248. ^ Weir, Alison (2008). “The Tudors”. Britain’s Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy. London: Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-09-953973-5.


Further reading


  • Ashley, Mike (2002). British Kings & Queens. Running Press. ISBN 0-7867-1104-3.
  • Bowle, John (1964). Henry VIII: a Study of Power in Action. Little, Brown and Company.
  • Erickson, Carolly (1984). Mistress Anne: the Exceptional Life of Anne Boleyn.
  • Cressy, David (1982). “Spectacle and Power: Apollo and Solomon at the Court of Henry VIII”. History Today32 (Oct): 16–22. ISSN 0018-2753.
  • Gardner, James (1903). “Henry VIII”Cambridge Modern History2.
  • Graves, Michael (2003). Henry VIII. Pearson Longman.
  • Ives, E. W (2004). “Henry VIII (1491–1547)”. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press.
  • Rex, Richard (1993). Henry VIII and the English Reformation.
  • Ridley, Jasper (1985). Henry VIII.
  • Starkey, David (2002). The Reign of Henry VIII: Personalities and Politics. Random House. ISBN 978-0-09-944510-4.
  • Starkey, David; Doran, Susan (2009). Henry VIII: Man and Monarch. British Library Publishing Division. ISBN 978-0-7123-5025-9.
  • Tytler, Patrick Fraser (1837). “Life of King Henry the Eighth”. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd. Retrieved 17 August 2008.
  • Wilkinson, Josephine (2009). Mary Boleyn: the True Story of Henry VIII’s Favourite Mistress (2 ed.). Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-0-300-07158-0.
  • Weir, Alison (1996). The Children of Henry VIII.
  • Wooding, Lucy. Henry VIII (2nd ed. 2015), scholarly biography

Scholarly studies


  • Coleman, Christoper; Starkey, David, eds. (1986). Revolution Reassessed: Revision in the History of Tudor Government and Administration.
  • Fox, Alistair; Guy, John, eds. (1986). Reassessing the Henrician Age: Humanism, Politics and Reform 1500–1550.
  • Head, David M. (1997). “‘If a Lion Knew His Own Strength’: the Image of Henry VIII and His Historians”. International Social Science Review72 (3–4): 94–109. ISSN 0278-2308.
  • Marshall, Peter (2009). “(Re)defining the English Reformation” (PDF). Journal of British Studies48 (3): 564–85. doi:10.1086/600128.
  • O’Day, Rosemary. The debate on the English Reformation (2nd ed. 2015). excerpt
  • O’Day, Rosemary, ed. The Routledge Companion to the Tudor Age (2010)
  • Rankin, Mark, Christopher Highley, and John N. King, eds. Henry VIII and his afterlives: literature, politics, and art (Cambridge UP, 2009).

Primary sources

  • Williams, C. M. A. H. English Historical Documents, 1485–1558 (1996)
  • Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII (36 volumes, 1862–1908). 
    most volumes are online here
    • Vol. 1. 1509–1514 and Index.- Vol. 2., pt. 1. 1515–1516.- Vol. 2., pt. 2. 1517–1518.- Vol. 3, pt. 1–2. 1519–1523.- Vol. 4. Introduction and Appendix, 1524–1530.- Vol. 4, pt. 1. 1524–1526.- Vol. 4, pt. 2. 1526–1528.- Vol. 4, pt. 3. 1529–1530, with a general index.- Vol. 5. 1531–1532.- Vol. 6. 1533.- Vol. 7. 1534.- Vol. 8. 1535, Jan.-July.- Vol. 9. 1535, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 10. 1536, Jan.-July.- Vol. 11. 1536, July–Dec.- Vol. 12, pt. 1. 1537, Jan.-May.- Vol. 12, pt. 2. 1537, June–Dec.- Vol. 13, pt. 1. 1538, Jan.-July.- Vol. 13, pt. 2. 1538, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 14, pt [i.e. pt.]. 1. 1539, Jan.-July.- Vol. 14, pt. 2. 1539, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 15. 1540, Jan.-Aug.- Vol. 16. 1540, Sept.- 1541, Dec.- Vol. 17. 1542.- Vol. 18, pt. 1 1543, Jan.-July.- Vol. 18, pt. 2. 1543, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 19, pt. 1. 1544, Jan.-July.- Vol. 19, pt. 2. 1544, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 20, pt. 1. 1545, Jan.-July.- Vol. 20, pt. 2. 1545, Aug.-Dec.- Vol. 21, pt. 1. 1546, Jan.-Aug.- Vol. 21, pt. 2. 1546, Sept.-1547, Jan.- Addenda: Vol. 1, pt. 1. 1509–1537 and undated. Nos. 1–1293.- Addenda: Vol. 1, pt. 2. 1538–1547 and undated. Nos. 1294-end and index
  • Nicolas, Nicholas Harris, ed., The Privy Purse Expences of Henry VIII, 1529–1532, Pickering, London (1827)
  • Martin Luther to Henry VIII, 1 September 1525
  • Henry VIII to Martin Luther. August 1526
  • Henry VIII to Frederic, John, and George, Dukes of Saxony. 20 January 1523 re: Luther.

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Henry VIII
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Henry VIII of England.
Henry VIIIHouse of TudorBorn: 28 June 1491 Died: 28 January 1547
Regnal titles
Preceded by
Henry VII
Lord of Ireland
Crown of Ireland Act 1542
King of England
Succeeded by
Edward VI
VacantTitle last held byRuaidrí Ua ConchobairKing of Ireland
Political offices
Preceded by
Sir William Scott
Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports
Succeeded by
Sir Edward Poyning
Preceded by
The Marquess of Berkeley
Earl Marshal
Succeeded by
The Duke of Norfolk
Peerage of England
VacantTitle last held byArthurPrince of Wales
VacantTitle next held byEdward
Preceded by
Duke of Cornwall
VacantTitle next held byHenry
CommunionsAnglican CommunionAnglican realignmentContinuing Anglican movementCatholic Anglican ordinariates
HistoryHistory of Christianity in Britain Celtic ChristianityAnglo-Saxon ChristianityÆthelberhtEdwinOffaAugustine of CanterburyPaulinusHygeberhtBedeMedieval architectureHenry VIIIEnglish ReformationCranmerDissolution of MonasteriesChurch of EnglandChurch of IrelandApostolic successionEdward VIElizabeth IParkerHookerJames IKing James VersionCharles ILaudCaroline DivinesNonjuring schismOxford MovementAnglo-CatholicismModern Church
TheologyTrinity FatherSonHoly SpiritThirty-nine ArticlesLambeth QuadrilateralSacramentsEucharistMarySaints
Liturgy and worshipBook of Common PrayerMorning / Evening PrayerLiturgical yearBiblical canonBooks of HomiliesHigh / Low / Broad church
Related topicsConverts to AnglicanismHeraldryMinistryMonasticismMusicAnglican prayer beadsAnglicanism of the AmericasAnglican OrdinariateAnglican UseFree Church of EnglandReformed Episcopal Church
 Christianity portal
hidevteEnglishScottish and British monarchs
Monarchs of England until 1603Monarchs of Scotland until 1603Alfred the GreatEdward the ElderÆlfweardÆthelstanEdmund IEadredEadwigEdgar the PeacefulEdward the MartyrÆthelred the UnreadySweynEdmund IronsideCnutHarold IHarthacnutEdward the ConfessorHarold GodwinsonEdgar ÆthelingWilliam IWilliam IIHenry IStephenMatildaHenry IIHenry the Young KingRichard IJohnHenry IIIEdward IEdward IIEdward IIIRichard IIHenry IVHenry VHenry VIEdward IVEdward VRichard IIIHenry VIIHenry VIIIEdward VIJaneMary I and PhilipElizabeth IKenneth I MacAlpinDonald IConstantine IÁedGiricEochaidDonald IIConstantine IIMalcolm IIndulfDubCuilénAmlaíbKenneth IIConstantine IIIKenneth IIIMalcolm IIDuncan IMacbethLulachMalcolm IIIDonald IIIDuncan IIDonald IIIEdgarAlexander IDavid IMalcolm IVWilliam IAlexander IIAlexander IIIMargaret of NorwayJohn BalliolRobert IDavid IIEdward BalliolRobert IIRobert IIIJames IJames IIJames IIIJames IVJames VMary IJames VI
Monarchs of England and Scotland after the Union of the Crowns from 1603James VI and ICharles ICharles IIJames II and VIIWilliam III and II and Mary IIAnne
British monarchs after the Acts of Union 1707AnneGeorge IGeorge IIGeorge IIIGeorge IVWilliam IVVictoriaEdward VIIGeorge VEdward VIIIGeorge VIElizabeth II
Debatable or disputed rulers are in italics.
hidevteDukes of Cornwall
Edward (1337–1376)Richard (1376–1377)Henry (1399–1413)Henry (1421–1422)Edward (1453–1471)Richard (1460; disputed)Edward (1470–1483)Edward (1483–1484)Arthur (1486–1502)Henry (1502–1509)Henry (1511)Edward (1537–1547)Henry Frederick (1603–1612)Charles (1612–1625)Charles (1630–1649)James (1688–1701/2)George (1714–1727)Frederick (1727–1751)George (1762–1820)Albert Edward (1841–1901)George (1901–1910)Edward (1910–1936)Charles (1952–present)
Cornwall Portal
hidevteDukes of York
Edmund of Langley (1385–1402)Edward of Norwich (1402–1415)Richard Plantagenet (1415–1460)Edward of York (1460–1461)Richard of Shrewsbury (1474–1483)Henry (1494–1509)Charles (1605–1625)James (1633/1644–1685)Ernest Augustus (1716–1728)Edward (1760–1767)Frederick (1784–1827)George (1892–1910)Albert (1920–1936)Andrew (1986–present)
italics denote Dukes of York and Albany
Authority control BIBSYS4094636BNEXX999823BNFcb11988809r (data)BPN27688824CANTICa11012195CiNiiDA02175843GND118548204ICCUITICCUSBLV131963ISNI0000 0001 2258 6127LCCNn79113093LNB000047642MBA78b3e75a-e409-4018-92f8-2ad8b9afede9NDL00620812NKCjn20000700820NLA35187905NLG156134NLI000062154NSK000074103NTA070457999PLWABN9810681103705606RERO02-A000079627RKD490218SELIBR207833SNACw6x66rjtSUDOC027303608TePapa33012Trove857339ULAN500205051VcBA495/75086VIAF172419710WorldCat Identitieslccn-n79113093


Children of Henry VIII

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to navigationJump to search

Henry VIII of England had several children. The best known children are the three legitimate offspring who survived infancy and would succeed him as monarchs of England successively, Edward VIMary I and Elizabeth I.

His first two wivesCatherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn, had several pregnancies that ended in stillbirthmiscarriage, or death in infancy. Henry acknowledged one illegitimate child, Henry FitzRoy, as his own, but is suspected to have fathered several illegitimate children by different mistresses.[1] The number and identity of these is a matter of historical debate.[citation needed]

There are many theories about whether Henry VIII had fertility difficulties.[2] His last three wives, Anne of ClevesCatherine Howard and Catherine Parr are not known to have conceived by him, although Parr conceived in her next marriage.[3]

None of Henry’s acknowledged children (legitimate or otherwise) had children of their own, leaving him with no direct descendants after the death of Elizabeth in 1603.


Legitimate children

By Catherine of Aragon (married Palace of Placentia 11 June 1509; upheld by Catholic Church, annulled in the Anglican Church 23 May 1533); died 7 January 1536.
Unnamed daughter31 January 1510stillborn
Henry, Duke of Cornwall1 January 151122 February 1511He died aged almost two months
Unnamed son17 September 1513He either was stillborn or died shortly after birth[4]
Unnamed son8 January 1515stillborn
Queen Mary I18 February 151617 November 1558She married Philip II of Spain in 1554 with no issue
Unnamed daughter10 November 1518stillbirth in the 8th month of pregnancy[5] or lived at least one week
By Anne Boleyn (married Westminster Abbey 25 January 1533; annulled 17 May 1536) beheaded on 19 May 1536
Queen Elizabeth I7 September 153324 March 1603never married; no issue
Unnamed sonChristmas, 1534miscarriage or false pregnancy[6][a]
Unnamed son29 January 1536miscarriage of a child, believed male, in the fourth month of pregnancy[8][9]
By Jane Seymour (married Palace of Whitehall 30 May 1536) died 24 October 1537
King Edward VI12 October 15376 July 1553unmarried; no issue

Illegitimate children

Henry VIII of England had one acknowledged illegitimate child, as well as several others who are suspected to be his, by his mistresses.

He acknowledged Henry Fitzroy (15 June 1519 – 23 July 1536), the son of his mistress Elizabeth Blount, and granted him a dukedom; married Mary FitzRoy, Duchess of Richmond and Somerset. No issue.

Others suspected of being his include:

Fictional portrayals

See also


  1. ^ Another pregnancy or false pregnancy is thought by some to have happened the next year. But this is likely caused by a misdating of a letter.[7]


  1. ^ Hart, Kelly (1 June 2009). The Mistresses of Henry VIII (First ed.). The History Press. ISBN 978-0-7524-4835-0.
  2. ^ Whitley, Catrina Banks; Kramer, Kyra (2010). “A New Explanation for the Reproductive Woes and Midlife Decline of Henry Viii”. The Historical Journal53 (4): 827–848. doi:10.1017/S0018246X10000452.
  3. ^ “Catherine Parr: Children”The Six Wives of Henry VIIIPBS. Retrieved 11 October 2008.
  4. ^ The Pregnancies of Anne Boleyn and Catherine of Aragon in: theanneboleynfiles.com [retrieved 17 April 2016].
  5. ^ Starkey 2003, p. 160
  6. ^ Eustace Chapuys wrote to Charles V on 28 January reporting that Anne was pregnant. A letter from George Taylor to Lady Lisle dated 27 April 1534 says that “The Queen hath a goodly belly, praying our Lord to send us a prince”. In July, Anne’s brother, Lord Rochford, was sent on a diplomatic mission to France to ask for the postponement of a meeting between Henry VIII and Francis I because of Anne’s condition: “being so far gone with child she could not cross the sea with the King”. Chapuys backs this up in a letter dated 27 July, where he refers to Anne’s pregnancy. We do not know what happened with this pregnancy as there is no evidence of the outcome. Dewhurst writes of how the pregnancy could have resulted in a miscarriage or stillbirth, but there is no evidence to support this, he therefore wonders if it was a case of pseudocyesis, a false pregnancy, caused by the stress that Anne was under – the pressure to provide a son. Chapuys wrote on 27 September 1534 “Since the King began to doubt whether his lady was enceinte or not, he has renewed and increased the love he formerly had for a beautiful damsel of the court”. Muriel St Clair Byrne, editor of the Lisle Letters, believes that this was a false pregnancy too.
  7. ^ The only evidence for a miscarriage in 1535 is a sentence from a letter from Sir William Kingston to Lord Lisle on 24 June 1535 when Kingston says “Her Grace has as fair a belly as I have ever seen”. However, Dewhurst thinks that there is an error in the dating of this letter as the editor of the Lisle Letters states that this letter is actually from 1533 or 1534 because it also refers to Sir Christopher Garneys, a man who died in October 1534.
  8. ^ Starkey 2003, p. 553
  9. ^ Chapuys reported to Charles V on 10 February 1536 that Anne Boleyn had miscarried on the day of Catherine of Aragon’s funeral: “On the day of the interment [of Catherine of Aragon] the concubine [Anne] had an abortion which seemed to be a male child which she had not borne 3 1/2 months”.
  10. ^ Hart, Kelly (1 June 2009). The Mistresses of Henry VIII (First ed.). The History Press. ISBN 978-0-7524-4835-0.

Further reading[edit]


You could be forgiven for thinking that Henry VIII had only one child: Queen Elizabeth I of England. Elizabeth is one of the most famous women in British history, her smarts, ruthlessness and heavily made-up face still making her a well-known fixture of films, television shows and books today.

But before Queen Elizabeth there were King Edward VI and Queen Mary I of England, her younger brother and older sister. And the three monarchs were only Henry VIII’s legitimate children who survived beyond a few weeks. The Tudor king also had one illegitimate child who he acknowledged, Henry Fitzroy, and is suspected of having fathered several other illegitimate children too.

Mary Tudor

Henry VIII’s oldest daughter earned herself the unfortunate nickname “Bloody Mary”.

Mary, the oldest of Henry VIII’s legitimate children, was born to his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, in February 1516. Henry was affectionate towards his daughter but increasingly less so towards her mother who had not born him a male heir.

Henry sought for the marriage to be annulled — a pursuit that ultimately led to the Church of England breaking away from the authority of the Roman Catholic Church which had denied him an annulment. The king finally got his wish in May 1533 when Thomas Cranmer, the first Protestant archbishop of Canterbury, declared Henry’s marriage to Catherine void.

Five days later, Cranmer also declared Henry’s marriage to another woman valid. That woman’s name was Anne Boleyn and, adding insult to injury, she was Catherine’s lady in waiting.

In September of that year, Anne gave birth to Henry’s second legitimate child, Elizabeth.

Mary, whose place in the line of succession was replaced by her new half-sister, refused to acknowledge that Anne had superseded her mother as queen or that Elizabeth was a princess. But both girls soon found themselves in similar positions when, in May 1536, Queen Anne was beheaded.

Edward Tudor

Edward was Henry VIII’s only legitimate son.

Henry then married Jane Seymour, regarded by many as the favorite of his six wives and the only one to bear him a son who survived: Edward. Jane gave birth to Edward in October 1537, dying of postnatal complications shortly after.

When Henry died in January 1547 it was Edward who succeeded him, aged just nine. The king was England’s first monarch to be raised Protestant and, despite his young age, he took a great interest in religious matters, overseeing the establishment of Protestantism in the country.

Edward’s reign, which was plagued by economic problems and social unrest, came to an abrupt end in July 1553 when he died following months of illness.

The unmarried king left no children as heirs. In an effort to prevent Mary, a Catholic, from succeeding him and reversing his religious reformation, Edward named his first cousin once removed Lady Jane Grey as his heir. But Jane only lasted nine days as the de facto queen before most of her supporters abandoned her and she was deposed in favor of Mary.

During her five-year reign, Queen Mary gained a reputation for ruthlessness and violence, ordering hundreds of religious dissenters burnt at the stake in her pursuit of the restoration of Roman Catholicism in England. This reputation was so great that her Protestant opponents denounced her “Bloody Mary”, a name by which she is still commonly referred today.

Mary married Prince Philip of Spain in July 1554 but bore no children, ultimately failing in her quest to prevent her Protestant sister, Elizabeth, from becoming her successor. After Mary fell ill and died in November 1558, aged 42, Elizabeth was named queen.

Elizabeth Tudor

Elizabeth, who ruled for nearly 50 years and died in March 1603, was the last monarch of the House of Tudor. Like her brother and sister, she too bore no children. Even more surprisingly for the time, she never married (though stories of her many suitors are well documented).

Elizabeth’s long reign is remembered for many things, not least England’s historic defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, seen as one of the country’s greatest military victories.https://c8d80c686565439b43e00263064ff90d.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

Drama also flourished under the queen’s rule and she successfully reversed her sister’s own reversal of the establishment of Protestantism in England. Indeed, Elizabeth’s legacy is so great that her reign has a name all of its own — the “Elizabethan era”.

Henry Fitzroy – Born 15 June 1519

Henry Fitzroy (illegitimate) 15 June 1519 - 23 July 1536 (Bessie Blount)
Henry Fitzroy (illegitimate) 15 June 1519 – 23 July 1536 (Bessie Blount)

Mother: Elizabeth “Bessie” Blount
24 Apr 1525 (6 years old) – Created Knight of the Garter.
16 Jun of 1525 – Titled, Earl of Nottingham and Duke of Richmond.
May 1525 – Titled Admiral of England, Ireland, and Normandy.
Note: The boy was given the name “Fitzroy” to show that the king acknowledged his bastard son, for the name “Fitzroy” means, “son of the king.”

Thomas Stukley (Stukeley, Stuckley, Stucley) –  Born 1520

Stukeley and Henry VIII (1533)

Mother: Jane Pollard, wife of Sir Hugh Stukley.
Occupation: English mercenary
Died: Battle of Alcazar in 1578.

Elizabeth Tailboys – Born c. April 1520

Elizabeth Tailboys was born c. April 1520 to Elizabeth “Bessie” Blount, wife of Gilbert Tailboys, and half-sister to Henry Fitzroy. Some believe that Elizabeth is also the daughter of Henry VIII since she was supposedly conceived shortly after Bessie gave birth to Henry Fitzroy. Also, Gilbert and Bessie married within weeks of Henry’s birth – Bessie was most likely pregnant when they married. The quick marriage could have been a way for the king to cover up the fact that he fathered another illegitimate child with Bessie.

If Elizabeth had been a boy, would Henry VIII tried to claim the child and name him Fitzroy as well?

“There is also evidence that Henry VIII took an interest in Elizabeth Tailboys, above and beyond that which would be expected of the child of a former mistress. During his northern progress in 1541, for example, Henry spent the night of 13 October at Nocton in Lincolnshire, the home of Elizabeth Tailboys and her first husband, Thomas Wymbish. It was also Henry who provided this wealthy husband for Elizabeth.”

Catherine Carey – c. 1524

Catherine Carey was the daughter of Henry VIII’s mistress, Mary Boleyn. Mary was the sister of Henry’s second wife, Anne Boleyn. In 1520 Mary wedded William Carey. Catherine was born c. 1524, and it is suspected that Henry had continued his affair with Mary after she had married William Carey – we all know, what the king wanted, he got. In the portrait below of Catherine there is an uncanny resemblance to Henry VIII.

  • The husband of Mary (Boleyn) Carey, William Carey received Royal Grants in 1524 and 1526. Those grants are thought to coincide with the birth of Catherine and her brother, Henry Carey. It is believed that Henry VIII was compensating William Carey for the fact that these were not his (William’s) biological children, and that his wife was having an affair with the King of England.
  • When Henry VIII wanted a papal dispensation to marry Anne Boleyn, he is suspected of doing so because he fathered children with her sister, Mary.

Richard Edwardes – Born 25 March 1525

Richard Edwardes/Edwards was born 25 March 1525 to Agnes Blewitt Edwards. Richard was an English poet, playwright and composer – all of which Henry VIII was also known for. Richard Edwardes was made a Gentleman of the Chapel Royal, and became master of the singing boys. He was also rumoured to be an illegitimate son of Henry VIII.

There is not much information regarding his mother or Richard himself, which leads us to believe that he was not an illegitimate child of Henry VIII, or that we need more information.

To see an example of one of his poems – Click <HERE>


Henry Carey – 4 March 1526

Henry Carey was the second child of Henry VIII’s mistress, Mary (Boleyn) Carey, and her husband, William Carey. He was born on 4 March 1526. Some historians have also speculated that he might have been an illegitimate child of Henry VIII.

When William Carey died on 23 June 1528, Anne Boleyn was granted the wardship of her nephew. Why wouldn’t Mary be allowed to raise her own son after the death of her husband? Seems a little strange.

In April 1535, the nine-year-old Henry Carey was apparently living at Syon, Isleworth, Middlesex when he was referred to as the king’s son.

Henry Carey died 23 July 1596 and was buried in St. John the Baptist’s Chapel, Westminster Abbey, at Queen Elizabeth I’s expense. Although Henry Carey was known to be poor, his tomb was the tallest in Westminster Abbey, at thirty-six feet high. It was made of alabaster and marble.


Etherlreda “Audrey” Malte – 1527

Ethelreda Malte was born c. 1527 to Joan Dingley, alias Dobson and her husband, John Malte.

Ehtelreda “Audrey” was an English courtier who was reputed to be an illegitimate daughter of King Henry VIII. She was the wife of poet and writer John Harington.

Reports claim “Audrey” was fathered by Henry VIII, but not much is known about her mother – Joan Dingley/Dobson; under the circumstances, Joan would have been a member of the lesser nobility, not well-connected at court. One theory is she was a laundress, although Henry never openly acknowledged “Audrey”, he did give John Malte land and properties after Malte recognized her as his own daughter.

John Perrot – November 1528

John Perrot was born in November 1528 to Mary Berkeley, the wife of Sir Thomas Perrot.

John Perrot resembled Henry VIII in temperament and physical appearance, and it was believed he was the bastard son of Henry VIII.

His mother had been, briefly, mistress of Henry VIII, and his paternity has been ascribed to the King whom he resembled in physique and coloring.

The main source for this belief was Sir Robert Naunton (husband of Perrot’s granddaughter, Penelope), who had never known Perrot and used second-hand accounts to make his case. The case is weakened by the fact that Perrot was Mary Berkeley’s third child, not her first, and that she and the King are not recorded to have been in the same place at the crucial time. 

Naunton claimed that Sir Owen Hopton, Lieutenant of the Tower of London, overheard Perrot say, “Will the Queen suffer her brother to be offered up as a sacrifice to the envy of his frisking adversaries?”, suggesting that Perrot himself asserted his royal paternity. However, Hopton had been removed from office by the Queen eighteen months prior to Perrot’s imprisonment, so he could not have overheard Perrot make the claim there.”



Henry Fitzroy is the only recognized illegitimate child recognized by Henry VIII.

Henry FitzRoy, 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset (15 June 1519 – 23 July 1536), was the son of King Henry VIII of England and his mistress, Elizabeth Blount, and the only illegitimate offspring whom Henry VIII acknowledged.

Other children who were suspected of being illegitimate offspring of Henry VIII are Catherine Carey, who was the daughter of his mistress, Mary Boleyn. Most historians agree that Catherine was his daughter, hence the timeline of her conception, her “Tudor” red hair, and the fact that Henry VIII took an interest in her education and upbringing. Also, Catherine was a favorite of her cousin, Queen Elizabeth I. I believe Elizabeth I believed Catherine to be her sister rather than her cousin.

Catherine’s mother was Mary Boleyn, a mistress of Henry VIII before he courted and later married her sister, Anne Boleyn. Catherine is believed by some authors to be an illegitimate child of Henry VIII.

Catherine’s brother, Henry Carey is also rumored to be offspring, although he was conceived after Mary Boleyn married and the king tired of her, so it is highly unlikely.

The son of Mary Boleyn, he was a cousin of Elizabeth I. Since his mother was also a mistress to King Henry VIII of England, some historians have speculated that he might have been an illegitimate child of Henry VIII.

John Perrot, Thomas Stucley, Richard Edwardes, and Ethelreda Malte were other “rumored ” illegitimate children; however, there is scant evidence for these.

An interesting fact is that Mary I and Elizabeth I were actually deemed illegitimate by Henry VIII due to succession rights.

Illegitimate children[edit]

Henry VIII of England had one acknowledged illegitimate child, as well as several others who are suspected to be his, by his mistresses.

He acknowledged Henry Fitzroy (15 June 1519 – 23 July 1536), the son of his mistress Elizabeth Blount, and granted him a dukedom; married Mary FitzRoy, Duchess of Richmond and Somerset. No issue.

Others suspected of being his include:

Legitimate children

By Catherine of Aragon (married Palace of Placentia 11 June 1509; upheld by Catholic Church, annulled in the Anglican Church 23 May 1533); died 7 January 1536.
Unnamed daughter31 January 1510stillborn
Henry, Duke of Cornwall1 January 151122 February 1511He died aged almost two months
Unnamed son17 September 1513He either was stillborn or died shortly after birth[4]
Unnamed son8 January 1515stillborn
Queen Mary I18 February 151617 November 1558She married Philip II of Spain in 1554 with no issue
Unnamed daughter10 November 1518stillbirth in the 8th month of pregnancy[5] or lived at least one week
By Anne Boleyn (married Westminster Abbey 25 January 1533; annulled 17 May 1536) beheaded on 19 May 1536
Queen Elizabeth I7 September 153324 March 1603never married; no issue
Unnamed sonChristmas, 1534miscarriage or false pregnancy[6][a]
Unnamed son29 January 1536miscarriage of a child, believed male, in the fourth month of pregnancy[8][9]
By Jane Seymour (married Palace of Whitehall 30 May 1536) died 24 October 1537
King Edward VI12 October 15376 July 1553unmarried; no issue

You may also like...